Homebrew Removing A9LH+Luma influence from emunand?

[HolyHobo]

I just made an clean and unlinked emunand to test applications that could potentially cause a brick and I'm wondering if there is a way to remove the influence from luma cfw so that it basically on stock firmware without the sigpatches. Thank you in advance if you can answer my question!

 

[xtheman]

I know with Corbenik you can boot emunand (or sysnand) with no patches (even without firm protection and sig patches)

 

[HolyHobo]

I know with Corbenik you can boot emunand (or sysnand) with no patches (even without firm protection and sig patches)

Is it installed as a cia like NTR?

 

[invaderyoyo]

Is it installed as a cia like NTR?

Corbenik is another CFW

 

[HolyHobo]

Corbenik is another CFW

NTRCFW has a .cia boot method so i was just curious if corbenik could be too

 

[proflayton123]

Corbenik is essentially an active/updated cakes - [here] (https://gbatemp.net/threads/corbenik-another-cfw-for-advanced-users-with-bytecode-patches.429612/)

 

[MarioMasta64]

Is it installed as a cia like NTR?

corbenik is a cfw

 

[HolyHobo]

corbenik is a cfw

Corbenik is another CFW

NTRCFW has a .cia boot method so i was just curious if corbenik could be too

 

[HyperT]

Or https://gbatemp.net/threads/release-kecleon-patch-for-luma3ds.455090

 

[MarioMasta64]

Or https://gbatemp.net/threads/release-kecleon-patch-for-luma3ds.455090

possibly. (ive seen this thread and i think it has potential)