Here used to be a post about Python interpreter, but it was removed due to not being able to be compiled, and violating open-source license.
Last edited by Sono,
Why not Python35 instead? ;0
I was just thinking that having multiple Pythons interpreters would split the community and using the latest one would be better for the future :>Python3 should be working, but it needs additional patches, and since recompiling after an error takes ~20-40minutes, I got bored of it. I'll do it eventually
I was just thinking that having multiple Pythons interpreters would split the community and using the latest one would be better for the future :>
Python3 should be working, but it needs additional patches, and since recompiling after an error takes ~20-40minutes, I got bored of it. I'll do it eventually
Mind if I ask how you're compiling this that takes ~20-40 minutes? A compile of Python 3.5 on an Intel Atom C2750 based machine takes ~5 minutes for me... I'd imagine on a chip that's not intended for super low power usage, it should be even faster...
Are you building in parallel or just a single thread at a time?Intel Celeron on win8 (not 8.1) takes ~20-40mins... On Linux-x86_64 it takes ~15-25mins to build.
Are you building in parallel or just a single core at a time?
If you're using make, just add -j<threadcount> ... General rule of thumb is that you should use ~2x the number of cores for good IO utilization.u wot? How could I build on multiple cores? It's nearly killing the lappy already at almost 100% CPU usage
And source code, I assume?I'll upload the 3dsx and cia in a few minutes