
I don't think you know how exploits work. the reason arm9loaderhax works is because (I think) someone discovered the 9.6+ kernel9loader doesn't verify the key it uses to decrypt the firmware, and also doesn't verify after decryption. had it verified the key, a9lh would not exist (at least as it is right now). also kernel9loader was introduced with New3DS, so if we were stuck with Old3DS we'd have a very different boot exploit if we even got one.idk why any one thought of a9lh sooner its not that old only like a few mouths what it is basically is its a hax stored on nand allowing you to boot into cfw fast
No, that's exactly what A9LH can do. Brick-protection is kind of its main point, really.

Furries always ruin the fun.I'm tired of this.
Reported post. I'm done with this circlejerking.
sameI'm tired of this.
Reported post. I'm done with this circlejerking.
rxTools was indeed being updated to support arm9loaderhax; unfortunately interest was lost in the project due to other better tools replacing it pretty much (Decrypt9, Luma3DS/CakesFW/etc).eh what happedn to rxtools anyways why don't they update it if they updated it to work with a9lh it would not be bad
not until they release support for it, which will come at a later date. they recently made a post talking about their 9.2 downgrader and thing that helps with the OTP process.what happed to gateway though people wih gateway cards can't use them with a9lh
does that mean nintedo can patch a9lh by patching kernel9loaderI don't think you know how exploits work. the reason arm9loaderhax works is because (I think) someone discovered the 9.6+ kernel9loader doesn't verify the key it uses to decrypt the firmware, and also doesn't verify after decryption. had it verified the key, a9lh would not exist (at least as it is right now). also kernel9loader was introduced with New3DS, so if we were stuck with Old3DS we'd have a very different boot exploit if we even got one.
no not really, kernel9loader is part of the firmware (the thing the bootrom executes). if they patched it, it wouldn't do anything as everyone would still use an older one for arm9loaderhax.does that mean nintedo can patch a9lh by patching kernel9loader
can could patch it by adding keys or some thing so the firmware so it checks to see if its being run legit or a cfw is being usedno not really, kernel9loader is part of the firmware (the thing the bootrom executes). if they patched it, it wouldn't do anything as everyone would still use an older one for arm9loaderhax.
I'm pretty sure they can tell if you are using custom firmware, but are not doing anything about it (yet?). this wouldn't let them overwrite the FIRM partitions though, if this is what you mean(?).can could patch it by adding keys or some thing so the firmware so it checks to see if its being run legit or a cfw is being used
i mean making it so there firmwares won't work with a custom firmware by making it check to see if a cfw is being usedI'm pretty sure they can tell if you are using custom firmware, but are not doing anything about it (yet?). this wouldn't let them overwrite the FIRM partitions though, if this is what you mean(?).
they could try to do that, but much like signatures it will probably be patched out.i mean making it so there firmwares won't work with a custom firmware by making it check to see if a cfw is being used
