Interesting... diffusion's match with mine... 3.2u + starfall
Why it founds the exact same addresses for the first two patches is completely bizarre to me... I may have a look at it tomorrow...
btw, can someone test the rest of the nocopy patches (3,4,5) for ntsc 3.2u
[Nocopy3]
version=289
offset=0x81332A54
value=0x38600001
[Nocopy4]
version=289
offset=0x81337218
value=0x3BE00000
[Nocopy5]
version=289
offset=0x8134AA48
value=0x801D0024
[Nocopy5]
version=289
offset=0x8134AA4C
value=0x5400003C
[Nocopy5]
version=289
offset=0x8134AA50
value=0x901D0024
[Nocopy5]
version=289
offset=0x8134AA54
value=0x48000018
if you want to play with it... here is the source... :
http://www.tepetaklak.com/data/crazymenunocopys.rar
maybe someone spots the mistake
Posts merged
frostyfrosty said:
if thats true, why didnt he implement all of the starfall patches? and only those 4 or 5?
main thing i wanted was the update blocker and the recovery mode. (or are these not needed with this or something?)
I know im askin a good amount of questions, but i just want to get things straight. ^^
It's just a single word patch.. I'm sure you'll be having it soon...