its possible that the new systems are just as hackable as the old but that they now have implemented measures for tracking and information gathering on those who are hacking. after the server hack i would assume that the new systems would also encrypt data and store more data locally on the system itself and not on the server. perhaps they have added new hardware or changed the machine code to address some new functions or features that could not have been implemented in a simple firmware update (after all the firmware updates are continually cracked).
it would be funny to find out that nothing obvious has changed and that the new systems are just honey pots.
-another world
Perhaps, I thought the tracking bit would help if they were running code (or another hacking method) to get into the network, then it can be like the silent alarms in banks, and make whom it may concern aware of it, or better yet, shut them off midway through the code (or other hacking method) and deny them access from that router/IP address. Just an idea though...
QUOTE(Rydian @ Apr 30 2011, 05:32 AM) And a bulletproof vest won't stop a headshot, but that doesn't mean it failed to stop a bullet from penetrating it.
