Hacking MT has more features than GW, GW behind.

[TVL]

.....im not sure they where trolling.....i think they actually believe this stuff

Me too, but I think they have a more vested interest in it than just being a regular consumer... If not then it's pretty sad.

 

[Snoozy]

the "CPU" is pure bs, they have a FPGA the exact same thing as gateway uses, and their USB update is backwards as gateway can do the exact same thing via the 3ds itself with no need to mess about with pc drivers etc.......look its all good you like your MT card now they have finally copied gateway but your just clutching at straws as to why its "better".......i mean come on you have had months to try figure out "why its better" meanwhile gateway users already had all the stuff that MT only just managed to copy and all you can come up with is "it has a usb port"

yes there is SO much "messing around with pc drivers" to update the firmware !

Why are GW users so embittered? Especially since they "borrowed" multi rom from MT. Is it not the case of the pot calling the kettle black?

 

[gamesquest1]

yes there is SO much "messing around with pc drivers" to update the firmware !

Why are GW users so embittered? Especially since they "borrowed" multi rom from MT. Is it not the case of the pot calling the kettle black?

gateway multi rom is nothing like MT multi........oh wait MT copied that too now, basically you can try justify owning a clone all you like.....and yeah using the drivers is a problem for some, its OS dependent, so people who use mac's cant even update their card without using a different computer or some sort of virtual machine, look each to their own if you like getting features months after everyone else, thats all good, but dont try act like thats a feature

 

[Ericss]

yes there is SO much "messing around with pc drivers" to update the firmware !

Why are GW users so embittered? Especially since they "borrowed" multi rom from MT. Is it not the case of the pot calling the kettle black?

So accurately stating that MT copied GW = being embittered?

And I'm still waiting for you to back up your claim that GW stole multirom from MT.

 

[Snoozy]

So accurately stating that MT copied GW = being embittered?

And I'm still waiting for you to back up your claim that GW stole multirom from MT.

Its nothing more than circumstantial as is the evidence against MT for GW software updates. As I already mentioned. But everyone knows MT brought multirom and a few weeks later GW magically had it.

 

[Timburpton]

Me think MT multirom look more better compare to GW

 

[gamesquest1]

Its nothing more than circumstantial as is the evidence against MT for GW software updates. As I already mentioned. But everyone knows MT brought multirom and a few weeks later GW magically had it.

take it you missed the post about MT sharing a video of the "features coming soon" that blatantly said GW3D in system settings.....gateway multi rom was much better than MT, which is why MT have now copied Gateways multi rom,anyways if you want to believe it sure, be delusional,yeah gateway cloned MT because you know like yeah MT where out first and stuff

at this point i will admit i was wrong, you kinda must be trolling

 

[Snoozy]

take it you missed the post about MT sharing a video of the "features coming soon" that blatantly said GW3D in system settings.....gateway multi rom was much better than MT, which is why MT have now copied Gateways multi rom,anyways if you want to believe it sure, be delusional,yeah gateway cloned MT because you know like yeah MT where out first and stuff

To consider that the MT and GW developers are not examining each others hardware and software is naive, the indication is that GW took multi rom from MT and further refined it. What else can we expect from hackers? MT did not adequately protect multirom and GW stole it. As soon as MT update their emunand GW users cry out they copied them and burst into tears - sigh -

 

[Deleted User]

Yep, it's a troll. Feeding stops now.

 

[Snoozy]

Yep, it's a troll. Feeding stops now.

(yawn)

 

[gamesquest1]

To consider that the MT and GW developers are not examining each others hardware and software is naive, the indication is that GW took multi rom from MT and further refined it. What else can we expect from hackers? MT did not adequately protect multirom and GW stole it. As soon as MT update their emunand GW users cry out they copied them and burst into tears - sigh -

yyyyawn boring ......as i said trolling/shill/delusional, take your pick.

 

[Snoozy]

yyyyawn boring ......as i said trolling/shill/delusional, take your pick.

how is it that MT users that actually put up a defence of MT get jumped on as trolling/shill/delusion by the GW brigade. GW people really seem to have a chip on their shoulder and an axe to grind.

As others have said competition drives development.

 

[Qtis]

Why can't we just get back to the times when everyone improving their product was a good thing? I don't care jack about who makes a product if it works. Some product may get the updates sooner, but if every product gets it, everyone wins. If you happen to own a Gateway, what do you loose if MT card or anyone else has the same features? It's almost like when people started defending the brick code in the Gateway. If you want to find a more consumer hostile approach to protecting your marketshare, I'd like to see an example (hint: breaking the consumer's machine that could be used with your product is not a good business practice).

Now keep it civil as these threads will get locked if that little requirement can't be had.

 

[retrofan_k]

Why can't we just get back to the times when everyone improving their product was a good thing? I don't care jack about who makes a product if it works. Some product may get the updates sooner, but if every product gets it, everyone wins. If you happen to own a Gateway, what do you loose if MT card or anyone else has the same features? It's almost like when people started defending the brick code in the Gateway. If you want to find a more consumer hostile approach to protecting your marketshare, I'd like to see an example (hint: breaking the consumer's machine that could be used with your product is not a good business practice).

Now keep it civil as these threads will get locked if that little requirement can't be had.

It's either jealously or just have nothing to do with their life to want to constantly criticize everything. It's each to their own who wants to own MT or GW card, as it's like everything else i.e buying a GPU card for your PC, as you could go AMD or Nvidia. This is off topic but's its what my point is.

People would say "Nvidia" is better than AMD and vice versa but still do the same job with different features, yet AMD take ages getting drivers pushed out over "Nvidia", so going back to this MT card is better crap means nothing.

 

[ieatpixels]

have some freaking substance in the post.

 

[Deleted User]

MT card is crap. And it's damaging to GW users because GW probably spends more time protecting their "IP" against the likes of MT card than on implementing new features.

That's why it's bad.

> competition drives development.

Except MT is not innovating anything, they are just copying everything from GW

 

[Crass]

Mods are asleep guys! Post pictures of barnacles!

 

[Snoozy]

MT card is crap. And it's damaging to GW users because GW probably spends more time protecting their "IP" against the likes of MT card than on implementing new features.

That's why it's bad.

> competition drives development.

Except MT is not innovating anything, they are just copying everything from GW

MT brought multirom.

Please spew your bile elsewhere, thank you kindly

 

[p1ngpong]

Erm, closed.