Is connecting to unsecured wifi's without permission illegal?

Aijelsop

Question Asker
OP
Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2010
Messages
1,000
Trophies
0
XP
815
Country
United States
I just heard that connection to someones wifi even if it's not secured, is illegal without permission.

Is this true?
 

Originality

Chibi-neko
Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2008
Messages
5,716
Trophies
1
Age
35
Location
London, UK
Website
metalix.deviantart.com
XP
1,904
Country
Permissions are important. It's the difference between borrowing and stealing. It's the difference between advertisement and copyright infringement. It's the difference between sex and [censored].

If you're taking someone's Internet without permission, that's illegal. Whether they chose to use protection or not (I.e. Secured WiFi) is a matter of trust.
 

Aijelsop

Question Asker
OP
Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2010
Messages
1,000
Trophies
0
XP
815
Country
United States
QUOTE said:
But doesnt the 3DS automatically join a wifi connection, if there is one and is not secured?

That's what I thought...

Well, we have our own WiFi, but when I'm out I connect to random WiFi's. (Like, at my grandparents house, I use their neighbors) Not like McDonalds wifi >.
 

Nimbus

sudo /usr/bin make-me-a-coffee --nosugar --cream=1
Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2009
Messages
913
Trophies
0
Age
36
Location
Probably being lazy.
Website
Visit site
XP
311
Country
Well, yes in the sense.

IIRC, In the US at least (I assume similar laws exist in other countries), the minute you put a packet "or in other words, any encapsulated form of data" on someone else's personal network, without their explicit permission, irregardless of whether they have it secured or not, is illegal.

However public wifi if I also recall correctly does not bear this ruling, as it is made publicly available. For example, at my college we have an "Open" network, which has no security for guests (Why the fuck can they not just make a secured version of this network that everyone uses the same passkey on instead, will forever elude me.)

We as students are encouraged, literally to the point of which we feel required to not use this network and use our own secured "Student" network, to which we all have our own logins and passwords (Not WPA keys, not WEP, actual login credentials, and they work with all OS's)

Course anyone who doesn't secure their Wireless network provided that they can/have the ability to/should due to various reasons, but leaves it unencrypted for so called "convenience purposes" is foolish in my eyes and mind. I mean sure if you have an old grandma and she has an unsecured wireless router and she doesn't know how to configure it, that's fine but you really should either A. Show her, or B. Configure it and her devices accordingly.

Linux, Winderz, Mac OSX, iWhatever, most all Operating Systems and various devices that support Wifi can store the connection information for respective routers/access points/whatever, 90% of the time in an encrypted form. Additionally using the "connect automatically" feature in each of said OS allows you to..oh shocker..connect without having to retype the password.

It infuriates me when I see an AP that hasn't been secured and isn't belonging to some coffee shop or whatnot.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    if you keep them well enough fed, it's the same thing
    +1
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    By the power of Florida Man, I have the power!!! *Lifts up meth pipe* Meth Man!!! lol
  • BakerMan @ BakerMan:
    Guys, I just learned my little brother is in the hospital because he had a seizure last night.
  • cearp @ cearp:
    Sorry to hear that BakerMan
    +2
  • BakerMan @ BakerMan:
    Just found out he's doing alright, doing a lot of complaining too, rightfully so. Who wouldn't complain after having a seizure and being hospitalized?
    +1
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    Glad he is OK and complaining is cool :)
    +1
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Yeah been there had that no fun
    +1
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    They'll give him sleep studies eegs and possibly one week hospital stay
    +1
  • BakerMan @ BakerMan:
    I hope it's not a week.
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    It's standard so doctors can get a idea about what's going on
  • BakerMan @ BakerMan:
    understood
  • BakerMan @ BakerMan:
    well, i'm glad he seems to be doing fine, and ig i'm going to start spewing goofy shit again
  • BakerMan @ BakerMan:
    Update: Turns out he's epileptic
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Get a 2nd opinion run mris etc they told me that also
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    Also a food allergy study would be a good idea
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Turns out you can't sprinkle methamphetamine on McDonald's French fries
    +1
  • ZeroT21 @ ZeroT21:
    they wouldn't be called french fries at that point
    +1
  • ZeroT21 @ ZeroT21:
    Probably just meth fries
    +1
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    White fries hold up
    +1
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    @K3Nv2 sure you can
  • BakerMan @ BakerMan:
    why tf do people hate android users? is it the video quality? just because "AnDrOiD = pOoR" bc they don't cost an arm and a leg like iphones do?
  • BakerMan @ BakerMan:
    i won't be turned off by an iphone, but don't pick on me for having an android, that's just how this shit should work
  • ZeroT21 @ ZeroT21:
    Should say more what these kind of android users say bout nokia 3310 users
    ZeroT21 @ ZeroT21: Should say more what these kind of android users say bout nokia 3310 users