Saw recently that this was fully decrypted. Is that accurate, and if so where does that place the odds of a 7.00 exploit happening in the near future? I'm wondering if it's time for me to buy a 7.00 console?
Allegedly it was decrypted, what is debatable is the way that was done. From what I know, and I could be way wrong, to dump the kernel from memory you need elevated privileges from userland, so this would suggest that at least one individual was able to gain root on 7.00, maybe it's the same single exploit chain hinted for 5.55, maybe there are more than one.Saw recently that this was fully decrypted. Is that accurate, and if so where does that place the odds of a 7.00 exploit happening in the near future?
where are the greats? where is geohotz, the guy that "broke" anything?
You serious? Geohotz in return of Sony dropping the lawsuit opened against him, he pleaded to not touch a Sony gadget ever, so consider him retired, for good.
If he just used the argument, "It's not your code, it's mine." he would've won.
It's actually why Nintendo hasn't filed any lawsuits against those with CFW.
He broke the DMCA, he couldn't win. Not only that he distributed a modified version of a PUP & you need Sony's permission to do that.
Nintendo have filed lawsuits against TX, Nintendo won. You can't access their web site in the UK for example.
With atmosphere it's slightly more complicated because it's not entirely clear if it violates the DMCA or not. I believe gbatemp violates the DMCA with the sweet patches thread (as does anyone that bundles patches like Kosmos or ReiNX).
I thought the dmca protected from copycats if some one wanted to make like play box 4. Why would he need sonys permission for a modified pup when if he becomes legal owner of counsel. It would say in booklet dont modify system, but he could hydrolic press his ps4 and put on youtube
Why would he need sonys permission for a modified pup when if he becomes legal owner of counsel.
Also why Google hasn't intervened in the whole rooted phones gig.
Isn't that because rooting your android phone doesn't enable piracy? There isn't really any DRM in android phones.
It's kinda hard to lock down an operating system that everyone has the source code to.
Like henry ford was the orginal car maker? And each other car after is a different codeIt's not that it doesn't enable piracy, it's more like it's not their code that creates the rooted environment. Can't sue someone if it's not your code being used.
Like henry ford was the orginal car maker? And each other car after is a different code
It's not that it doesn't enable piracy, it's more like it's not their code that creates the rooted environment. Can't sue someone if it's not your code being used.
Not to go more off topic but thats bs. Apple is doing same thing to 3rd party battery repairs where they put a chip on a battery that is nonremovable and just putting a new battery without apple will make the battery error message appear. So apple is forcing 80 dollar or more battery repair since they cant sue the 3rd party repair service. As the saying goes anything thats connected to the internet except it to be hackableYes, you can. I think you need to read up on what the DMCA/EUCD (basically any WIPO country has similar rules) does.
You can break those laws without making any code changes, all you have to do is tell people how to work round DRM and you've broken the law.
Not to go more off topic but thats bs.
A battery replacement is not equivalent to enabling pirated content being played on consoles.
Besides, the US courts have decided that DMCA doesn't prevent jailbreaking phones but does prevent jailbreaking consoles (but weirdly does still cover tablets).
Maybe you should do some basic research?