TM2-Megatron said:nando said:just like apple haters.
I'll give Apple credit when they actually release a device that doesn't sacrifice functionality for the sake of aesthetics, or overly crippled hardware that only ends up being more successful than more-capable competing products because Apple is so good at marketing to shallow, image-conscious consumers. I prefer things that actually work, as opposed to it onl being an advertising slogan.
functionality and aesthetics at least when it comes to apple products aren't exclusive of each other. take a good look at the laptops for example. the unibody serves a structural function and the fabrication method lends itself to some beautiful design detail that are also functional, like the little notch that is cut out to lift the screen open. the precision of the manufacturing along with the rigidity of the glass (the glass has a function too) allows the laptop to close more evenly keeping dust out of the computer.
aesthetics are a function or feature in on themselves and before apple, all computer manufacturers ignored that fact.