Out of all the Intel Core ix Processors which is the fastest (Not including Turbo Boost)
i7 i5 i3 i2??
i7 i5 i3 i2??
lol U really need 2 type proprly U hav a full keybrd.dn_angel000 said:lol U really need 2 take a look at a Best Buy ad or check out their site! lol
dn_angel000 said:The i2 processor is pretty new it came out right around the i3 was released!
First of all, the 1156 socket supports Core i7s too, just not the same models that 1366 supports.Originality said:Core i3 and i5 use SKT1156 and also uses dual channel memory. i3 is equivolent to Core 2 Duo and i5 is equivolent to Core 2 Quad. You can still get Core 2 Duos faster than most of the Core i series, but the new architecture means it's able to handle instructions more efficiently which makes it more suitable to modern computing (especially as more programs/games are being coded to use multi-threading, which is something the Core i series excells at with hyper-threading). Just an example, some of the Core i7s are only ~1.7Ghz, but since they have 4+4 cores, they work very well with multi-threaded applications.
And again, someone doesn't know what the fuck he/she/it is talking about.ultimatex said:and if you combine it with 4-8gb ddr3 main, nvidia ddr3-5 w/ 1gb+memory, you have now a monster PC.
AMD is actually always a step behind Intel, in gaming: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-g...970,2698-7.htmlBerthenk said:And again, someone doesn't know what the fuck he/she/it is talking about.ultimatex said:and if you combine it with 4-8gb ddr3 main, nvidia ddr3-5 w/ 1gb+memory, you have now a monster PC.
That's why I'm with AMD. I don't want a huge performance, I want something cheap that can do what I need without being too expensive.
Doesn't change the fact that Intel is more expensive.raulpica said:AMD is actually always a step behind Intel, in gaming: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-g...970,2698-7.htmlBerthenk said:And again, someone doesn't know what the fuck he/she/it is talking about.ultimatex said:and if you combine it with 4-8gb ddr3 main, nvidia ddr3-5 w/ 1gb+memory, you have now a monster PC.
That's why I'm with AMD. I don't want a huge performance, I want something cheap that can do what I need without being too expensive.
Berthenk said:Doesn't change the fact that Intel is more expensive.raulpica said:AMD is actually always a step behind Intel, in gaming: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-g...970,2698-7.htmlBerthenk said:And again, someone doesn't know what the fuck he/she/it is talking about.ultimatex said:and if you combine it with 4-8gb ddr3 main, nvidia ddr3-5 w/ 1gb+memory, you have now a monster PC.
That's why I'm with AMD. I don't want a huge performance, I want something cheap that can do what I need without being too expensive.