Why? They have no qualms about ripping you off when you buy the same game for the upteenth time!
Why? They have no qualms about ripping you off when you buy the same game for the upteenth time!
A V3 of the "port" has emerged, controls have been refined and the visuals look sharper to me, it still doesn't feel as good as the original though, especially while using the wing cap, and there are still unfixed glitches here and there but it's better than V2 in many ways.
I have v3 if you want itYet no one has ever proven they have ever been unbanned on a switch. Please stop talking out of your ass.
I wonder how many people have "damaged" their system by installing an nsp from a shady place, or have somehow got their data compromised.
I second this
^ above but its an nspAny hints about where this new version could be found? Can it be found in Google? I can't find it anywhere after a while searching for it.
Yet no one has ever proven they have ever been unbanned on a switch. Please stop talking out of your ass.
I wonder how many people have "damaged" their system by installing an nsp from a shady place, or have somehow got their data compromised.
I second this
You're spreading misinformation based on hearsay. Therefore, yes, you are talking out of your ass. Either way, if you just download anything you find on the internet, you're going to have a bad time.I'm not talking out of my ass rude boy, in no way I said this happens, i said its a possibility backed up by Blawar the developer of Incognito, go read the description of Incognito and read the thread where he states what malicious homebrew can steal of your Switch before you acuse me. Even if I am wrong, I don´t mind it at all, stop being a d*ck to other users, thanks.
View attachment 208712
I had it somewhere in my computer i cant remember where I put it plus Im not sure what version it was. i had it on free download manager and now it missing i must have moved it somewhere when it first appear on gbatemp dont need malware thanks
I'm not talking out of my ass rude boy, in no way I said this happens, i said its a possibility backed up by Blawar the developer of Incognito, go read the description of Incognito and read the thread where he states what malicious homebrew can steal of your Switch before you acuse me. Even if I am wrong, I don´t mind it at all, stop being a d*ck to other users, thanks.
The port this was forked off of, is really awesome. I've built the web version (which isn't exciting to play; just exciting to see run in a browser at full speed) and the PC version, which is seeing updates like every few hours. I've built it both in Windows (msys2) and under Ubuntu.There's an awesome open source version that seems to run perfectly fine, you'll have to provide the ROM and compile it yourself though. https://github.com/fgsfdsfgs/sm64pc/tree/switch
I have two switch versions installed, how can I tell which is v1, v2, or v3?
They have different icons, and with one, the file select menu is fills the screen, the other doesn't.
installed via tinfoil, I only saw the game name.interesting no filename number?
I didn't update the readme in the new switch branch because it's still WIP, but the one in oldtesting says how to build it.This switch branch, however, will not build as-is (at least under Ubuntu). Devkitpro rules aren't being used, you have to manually set the path to devkitA64/bin, and library references are messed up. Definitely not something your average gbatemper can simply clone and build.
Cool, thanks! With TARGET_SWITCH=1 and BETTERCAMERA=1, CORRECT?I didn't update the readme in the new switch branch because it's still WIP, but the one in oldtesting says how to build it.
You don't set the variables in the Makefile because everyone has their dka64 install in different paths, so there is a script provided that sets it, in the devkitpro-pkgbuild-helpers pacman package.
Then you just run source $DEVKITPRO/switchvars.sh and it sets all the variables you need, and then you run the Makefile. That's how most of my ports are built.
There are rule files for make included with libnx and stuff, but including them screws up the original Makefile.
Saw a guide for nsp->xci on the tx forums, but I doubt it would work very well in this case. At the moment, nro->nsp just makes a forwarder, and not a normal nsp, like what gets downloaded and installed from the eshop.Can it be converted to xci?