- Joined
- Sep 13, 2009
- Messages
- 30,767
- Solutions
- 14
- Reaction score
- 67,283
- Trophies
- 8
- Location
- Making a non-binary fuss
- XP
- 35,239
- Country



I hear $500 goes great with ketchup and maybe a little salt.If I had $500 bucks to either spend on this, I would probably just burn the money and enjoy the heat.
Well the case for the $500 here is that on an emulator, your NES games aren't going to look as they would on an actual television from the NES era. Some enthusaists are alright with this, as they figure all they need is the console-side of thigns to be reproduced accurately, but others also feel the displays need to match also, especially considering how many games were developed with boob-tube tellies in mind. As an example, dithering looks like shite on any modern television or display, but on the average display from the late 80s, dithering creates a new color on the display that isn't otherwise available to the NES's palette.I don't get why people still buy old console hardware/clones when a pc/laptop + emulator setup is much more convenient and easier to put together.
I hear $500 goes great with ketchup and maybe a little salt.




This console isn't emulating anything, from what I've read, it actually has original NES chips. Apparently they scavanged some from old systems.
Basically, you're paying 500$ for a new thing that has a part probably older than you. x'D

If you want to see your NES games "like they originally were played" then buy a shitty 20" CRT TV and a NES and then realize how awful it is. Just because it was "muh childhood" doesn't mean it was great, it was just technology at the time was abysmal.
If you're smart you'll just spend $500 on something that can emulate a NES and play it on a TV. Hell, buy a Wii and like 50+ NES games off the Wii Store for that.


$500.00?!
Not on your life!
Maybe, but "not on your life" is a thing, and he used it correctly.Shouldn't it be "Not in your life!"?
