The second amendment is obsolete and provide no protection, the government can just drone strike you.
Its like if we gave everyone penicillin today, all the bacteria are immune, just because it worked 300 years ago doesnt mean is still does.
You would have better luck with 3 carfentanyl(a reallllly potent form of heroin, used to sedate elephants) gas canisters, one on each branch of government, theres no way in hell you will win a ground war with the US government.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moscow_theater_hostage_crisis#Evacuation
Well duh, ground operations would be suicide. The war would have to be fought with information and technology first. Gain a bunch of allies, get a billionaire or two onboard. We pretty much live in a cyberpunk world, why wouldn't a rebel group use that to their advantage? Cryptocurrency, hacking, counter-intelligence; it's all there. Now that most likely won't win by itself, but a full-blown war isn't necessary. Just need several coordinated strike teams to break the chain of command. Even if it did come to battling in the streets, the military is spread so thin overseas. The logistics of bringing all 2 million of those troops home at once is mind-boggling. Not to mention how many would either desert or outright rebel, shooting their CO in the back instead of attacking their fellow countrymen. Let's not forget the US is a nation that is fighting two wars against its own citizens and losing both of them. Yes, the government has better military technology than the citizens, but that's an argument against gun control in my eyes. A militia is only effective if it is armed just as well as the actual military. Doesn't matter too much. Anything not obtained legally can be stolen, hijacked, or sabotaged.
And who says when said government becomes tyrannical anyways? It's not like they'll one day just say, "So yep, we're going to be tyrannical now, k thx bye". The second amendment was created in a different time for a different time.
In my eyes, most developed countries, USA included (maybe especially), are either already there or just on the edge. There are so many unelected bodies here with the power to create laws at will, and they are immune from checks and balances. USA has entered into international treaties that directly affect the liberties of its people without any input from them. I'd say the second amendment is more relevant now than it ever has been. Why exactly is it less relevant than the rest of the Bill of Rights? Words have a lot of power to cause harm too, so maybe we should just repeal the first amendment while we're at it. Which state-mandated religion do you want? Christianity or Islam? With the first 2 amendments gone, there's literally nothing stopping that from happening.
I shouldn't have to say this, but a lot of the things I'm writing about are purely hypothetical worst-case scenarios. An armed revolution at this point probably would be met with failure, but I feel the possibility is a good deterrent. But I mean if you're comfortable with things like people going to jail over Facebook posts, then by all means, give up your rights for some false sense of security, but just know that the further you try to push something underground, it eventually becomes more prolific in the long term. Just look at the war on drugs and the war on terror. What have we achieved with those? More drugs and more terror. What have we lost? Tons of liberties and lives.