Ghostbusters 3

  • Thread starter Thread starter Veho
  • Start date Start date
  • Views Views 11,185
  • Replies Replies 57
  • Likes Likes 4
Is there something inherently wrong with Sony Pictures?
Spider Man for example.....:)

Tony Vinciquerra, CEO of Sony Pictures, said his "door is closed" to Spider-Man - so there's no hope that the superhero will re-enter the Marvel Cinematic Universe in the near future.
 
Last edited by Alexander1970,
  • Like
Reactions: AmandaRose
Is there something inherently wrong with Sony Pictures?

IMO because of these:

Blatant and unapologetic product placement
Ghostbusters (2016)
Pixels
Smurfs
Emoji Movie
Sausage Party
Angry Birds movie
Adam Sandler and friends' movies like Paul Blart
Holmes & Watson
and many more

Edit: RLM gif for extra spice (I know most of those pictured aren't Sony)

26d.gif


To their credit, they to do eek out a good movie every now and then such as Into the Spider-Verse, 007s and apparently even Once Upon a Time in Hollywood through Columbia.
 
Last edited by subtextz,
Spider Man for example.....:)
You mean the part where Disney demanded 50% of the earnings of Spiderman's future standalone films, as opposed to the 5% they had agreed to when they made the deal with Sony? It takes two to tango.
 
You mean the part where Disney demanded 50% of the earnings of Spiderman's future standalone films, as opposed to the 5% they had agreed to when they made the deal with Sony? It takes two to tango.

This raises my opinion about Sony Pictures currently unfortunately not really synonymous.:)

What is it, after all, it is not to change.:)
 
  • Like
Reactions: AmandaRose
Why in God´s name is it called Ghostbusters:Legacy in German......
Because it's about a new generation of ghost busters, inheriting/carrying on the original crew's legacy.

legacy

something transmitted by or received from an ancestor or predecessor or from the past

I like that title better than "Afterlife".
 
  • Like
Reactions: AmandaRose
So skip seeing stranger things altogether (as opposed to just series 3) then? Can do.

I find it hard to believe that a discovery so physics, philosophy and such shattering as the existence of ghosts, much less as publicly as happened in the previous films, would be as forgotten as it is made out to be there.

Tentatively optimistic there actually. It is of course a trailer/teaser but had a few hallmarks of nostalgia/bringing it back done right, and largely lacked the warning signs of a cash grab/name recognition type deal. Can't say I will have any interest in the would be sequel to this one (with a name like legacy, the characters there and in general what film doesn't hope to become a franchise these days?) but I would not mind this.
 
Yare yare daze. So, I've never been into the Ghostbusters franchise (I was born during a time when it wasn't relevant), so it doesn't have a whole lot of meaning to me, but I still want it to be good.

I'll probably get roped into seeing it with some family, if it doesn't get canceled.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Julie_Pilgrim
ah wtf now too damn late 93/95 or so would have been the time coincidence im watching the real ghostbusters cartoon while discovering a typing to this post. vhs rips ofcourse. Call it Fake! Call it a Fuck! Call it Crap!

Ant man gets trapped inside the Quantum Realm in the GhostTrap.

@AmandaRose Stranger Things was the best giveaway Series 2 I think? and yeah I recognize the kid.
 
Last edited by CORE,
  • Like
Reactions: AmandaRose
Yeah the trailer reminded me of Stranger things...

I don't think it's going to have the ghostbusters feeling, instead it's gonna have angsty teen post future 90s feeling to it.

I was excited at first, but now not so much haha. I feel that it might be a good movie, but probably not a good ghostbusters movie if that makes sense.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum