My displeasure is that violence against homosexuals gets all the press, but violence against Christians gets disregarded. I shan't deny that homosexuals get hurt and abused, but the amount/type of Christianity-bashing (and general homophobe-bashing) is ridiculous. I mean, if I bought a grape from someone whom I did not know that was a homophobe (and by "homophobe" I mean "anyone who disapproves of homosexuality in any way"), the homofascists (the "pro-gay" versions of the Westboro Drongos) would be all over me, claiming that I wold just LO-O-O-OVE to see a gay write in pain and burn in Hell, just like the Westboro Drongo I am. Eugh. The "gay problem" is not the existence of homosexuals, but the way the homofascists are pushing and exaggerating the issue. (I do not want to bother in trying to please them; try arguing with a Westboro Drongo, and you know how dense is a homofascist.)
Also, whomever says that the Bible teaches Christians to hate homosexuals need to re-read not only the Gospel, but also Jonah's story, as well. (The reason why Jonah ran away from Niniveh was because he WANTED God to judge Niniveh for their sins, despite God's call for repentance.) Also, in Ezekiel, God sys that He has no glory in those who die, but rather repent.
As for whether homosexuality is natural, we need to look as the "homosexuals can not make babies" issue at another angle. To put this my way, homosexuality is not bad because such does not make babies, but the fact that homosexuality does not make babies bring suspicion towards the issue. Plus, are not man and woman designed to complement each other? Had homosexuality been normal, should not homosexuals have a specially designed anatomy for them?
Also, the way that homofascists (not necessarily homosexuals) behave is rather suspicious. They make such noise about their opinion but make loud attempts to silence the other side ("We're here! We're queer! Get used to it!"). They praise Matthew Shepard but denounce Mary Stachowicz. They call homofascism "that thing that Christians scream when we get angry at their throwing poop at us," yet they crush the opposition rather crudely (Remember the Ms. Universe Scandal? What about the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence?). They point at all the suffering that homosexuals have but insist that Christians are in the majority and affluent (even though those in other countries, like North Korea, India, the Middle East, and Indonesia are undergoing REAL suffering and persecution). They may be open to conversation, but, once you start winning the debate (even if such is basic stuff like "Homosexuals consistently get higher disease rates are shorter lifespans" or "Why homosexuality is good but incest is bad?"), they denounce you. They insist that ex-gay ministries are detrimental to a person's health, but they immediately go all over a person who is actually happy with a new non-homosexual life.
The issue is not that people care too little about homosexuals, but that they care for them the wrong way.
...and now I am going to be banned for saying all of this.