DSi Common Key Bruteforcer
- Thread starter WB3000
- Start date
- Views 60,862
- Replies 370
- Status
well, wasnt that a better way to get the dsi key? rather than bruteforcing?
and the dsi key will just be used to pirate dsiware isnt it? like the wii common key?
and the dsi key will just be used to pirate dsiware isnt it? like the wii common key?
I would rather make a complete fool of myself than miss something important.
Brute force would take a long time even on a PS3 farm of 1024 units so I had a look at key.bin and kkey.bin. The hex range looked familiar to I viewed them as Simplified Chinese. They seemed to make sense. Is there a Japanese speaker who can check to see if I was imagining things ?
Brute force would take a long time even on a PS3 farm of 1024 units so I had a look at key.bin and kkey.bin. The hex range looked familiar to I viewed them as Simplified Chinese. They seemed to make sense. Is there a Japanese speaker who can check to see if I was imagining things ?
It won't work on my computer
?
it says (in dutch) Kan de toepassing niet juist initialiseren (oxc0000135). klik op OK om de toepassing te beëindigen.
translation: unable to errr... (initialise?) the app in the right way. click ok to end it.
dunno?
sorry for my bad english but i do want to help to get the key ^^
it says (in dutch) Kan de toepassing niet juist initialiseren (oxc0000135). klik op OK om de toepassing te beëindigen.
translation: unable to errr... (initialise?) the app in the right way. click ok to end it.
dunno?
sorry for my bad english but i do want to help to get the key ^^
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2007
- Messages
- 30
- Trophies
- 0
- Location
- Carolina, Puerto Rico
- Website
- Visit site
- XP
- 119
- Country
tijntje_7 said:It won't work on my computer?
it says (in dutch) Kan de toepassing niet juist initialiseren (oxc0000135). klik op OK om de toepassing te beëindigen.
translation: unable to errr... (initialise?) the app in the right way. click ok to end it.
dunno?
sorry for my bad english but i do want to help to get the key ^^
Do you have the .NET Framework installed on your PC?
Maybe that is the problem.
Probably not this comp is re-installed and doesn't have anything other than windows XP
Edit: It works now
Edit: It works now
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2008
- Messages
- 26
- Trophies
- 0
- Location
- Between Earth and the moon
- Website
- Visit site
- XP
- 68
- Country
Hey,
first of all, sory for my english
I was on the mood to improve the source code to make it a shared-computing kind project,
but there are some things buging me here..
First of all, its being assumed that nintendo used a 128-bit code, but they fairly could start using 256-bit now !
And almost everyone is using mode that randomizes only non-zero numbers, but there could be some zero byte, at least one..
I know WB3000 may have experience in this and I'm just starting now, maybe I need to learn some other things first...
I made too some calculations that made me quit the ideia!
If the key is 128-bit [16 byte], there is 256^16 possible keys [ 3,4028236692093846346337460743177 * 10 ^ 38 ]
If we could improve the code and make it test, lets say, 500 000 keys p/s [with some work it could be achieved even more because with shared computing we were testing ranges and not random numbers], and assuming 1 000 000 persons will use the program 24/7 you will still need 21880296226912195439 years to finish..
If the key's first bit really is 1, we could divide by 2 because we would need to test only odd keys, but it would need 10940148113456097719 yers yet.. Some other improvements could be made, but you would not live to see the results!
We need to wait and hope someone else could hack the NAND and find the common key..
first of all, sory for my english
I was on the mood to improve the source code to make it a shared-computing kind project,
but there are some things buging me here..
First of all, its being assumed that nintendo used a 128-bit code, but they fairly could start using 256-bit now !
And almost everyone is using mode that randomizes only non-zero numbers, but there could be some zero byte, at least one..
I know WB3000 may have experience in this and I'm just starting now, maybe I need to learn some other things first...
I made too some calculations that made me quit the ideia!
If the key is 128-bit [16 byte], there is 256^16 possible keys [ 3,4028236692093846346337460743177 * 10 ^ 38 ]
If we could improve the code and make it test, lets say, 500 000 keys p/s [with some work it could be achieved even more because with shared computing we were testing ranges and not random numbers], and assuming 1 000 000 persons will use the program 24/7 you will still need 21880296226912195439 years to finish..
If the key's first bit really is 1, we could divide by 2 because we would need to test only odd keys, but it would need 10940148113456097719 yers yet.. Some other improvements could be made, but you would not live to see the results!
We need to wait and hope someone else could hack the NAND and find the common key..
would be helpful if the program will only try keys, what have not been tried before, like many distributed network clients
so maybe a database where all tested combinations will be written is needed, so clients wont test same things over and over again...
so maybe a database where all tested combinations will be written is needed, so clients wont test same things over and over again...
I have left the program running in secure random for 1 day.... can someone please tell me what exactly it does and which option to choose (if I didn't choose the correct option)...
I have a question - surely a bruteforcer needs a decrypted and an encrypted version of what its bruteforcing, otherwise how will it know if it got it right? If that is indeed true, as I suspect it is, where did the decrypted content come from?
Yeah.... what exactly does it do? I have left it running for 2 days and the total keys it displays are: 247399xxx and still growning...
If 100.000 people use decrypt hardware boost they could find it out in 1 year 2 ^8 ^ 16 / 2 / Spead / 60 /60 /24 /365 /people Spead is 1.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000 so 1 year sorry for bad english
- Status
Similar threads
- Sticky
-
Xdqwerty
what are you looking at? - B btjunior
-
Psionic Roshambo
-
-
-
-
-
-
@
Xdqwerty:
@SylverReZ, I dislike the kind of drm where you have to play single player games online all the time bc of some verification bs+1
-
-
-
-
@
Xdqwerty:
@SylverReZ, I also heard one of the Prince of Persia games was so unfinished that it required the "24/7 online" drm so a puzzle could be done and the game could be finished. And that when the Ubisoft servers were closed the (cracked) game was impossible to finish or something like that
-
@
SylverReZ:
@Xdqwerty, That's extra scummy. Ubisoft nowadays ship out incomplete games like Skull and Bones which was being worked on for nearly a decade now.+1 -
-
-
@
Psionic Roshambo:
I like that games can be fixed after the fact, hate that it's being abused via beta tests... And DLC... I was a 7800 owner back in the day and loved Impossible Mission, turns out I couldn't beat it because it was actually impossible lol
-
@
Psionic Roshambo:
I never knew about it at the time but a fixed version was available but you had to mail in your broken copy lol
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
