I have had this argument with many of my mates. Whats better?? PSP or Ds. So i have decieded to put it up on here so you can make the choice.
These two consoles have different benifits. They are 2 totally different consoles that dont work the same. I found this review on PSP and DS. Have a read,
- DS
The good:
The Nintendo DS employs innovative dual-screen and microphone-enabled gameplay without load times on a higher-resolution display than Game Boy Advance SP while remaining backward compatible with older GBA games. The inclusion of Wi-Fi multiplayer capabilities and a touch screen allows for a growing list of original and fun games that you can't play on any other system.
The bad:
Third-party support for the system hasn't matched the originality and ingenuity of Nintendo's games, and multimedia potential remains exclusive to Japan. The system is quite bulky. The much more stylish and comfortable DS Lite is available for the same price.
The bottom line:
While it lacks the multimedia and graphical finesse of the Sony PSP, the feature-packed Nintendo DS is a worthy successor to the Game Boy Advance--but the new and improved DS Lite is available for the same price.
Specifications:
Product Description: Nintendo DS - Handheld game system ; Form Factor: Handheld ; Media Type: Cartridge
-PSP
The good:
The Sony PSP is a slick portable gaming system highlighted by an impressive wide-screen display and PS2-like graphics. It also boasts built-in Wi-Fi, a Web browser, and the ability to play music and videos, as well as to store images.
The bad:
The Sony PSP's multimedia functionality is underwhelming, especially for video, requiring expensive memory cards. The load times on the UMD games can be excessive.
The bottom line:
The Sony PSP elevates portable gaming to the next level, but its multimedia functionality falls short of its full potential.
Specifications:
Product Description: Sony PSP 1001 - Handheld game system ; Form Factor: Handheld ; Media Type: UMD (Universal Media Disc) ;
After Reading that what one is better???
Happy Gaming
These two consoles have different benifits. They are 2 totally different consoles that dont work the same. I found this review on PSP and DS. Have a read,
- DS
The good:
The Nintendo DS employs innovative dual-screen and microphone-enabled gameplay without load times on a higher-resolution display than Game Boy Advance SP while remaining backward compatible with older GBA games. The inclusion of Wi-Fi multiplayer capabilities and a touch screen allows for a growing list of original and fun games that you can't play on any other system.
The bad:
Third-party support for the system hasn't matched the originality and ingenuity of Nintendo's games, and multimedia potential remains exclusive to Japan. The system is quite bulky. The much more stylish and comfortable DS Lite is available for the same price.
The bottom line:
While it lacks the multimedia and graphical finesse of the Sony PSP, the feature-packed Nintendo DS is a worthy successor to the Game Boy Advance--but the new and improved DS Lite is available for the same price.
Specifications:
Product Description: Nintendo DS - Handheld game system ; Form Factor: Handheld ; Media Type: Cartridge
-PSP
The good:
The Sony PSP is a slick portable gaming system highlighted by an impressive wide-screen display and PS2-like graphics. It also boasts built-in Wi-Fi, a Web browser, and the ability to play music and videos, as well as to store images.
The bad:
The Sony PSP's multimedia functionality is underwhelming, especially for video, requiring expensive memory cards. The load times on the UMD games can be excessive.
The bottom line:
The Sony PSP elevates portable gaming to the next level, but its multimedia functionality falls short of its full potential.
Specifications:
Product Description: Sony PSP 1001 - Handheld game system ; Form Factor: Handheld ; Media Type: UMD (Universal Media Disc) ;
After Reading that what one is better???
Happy Gaming











