Can we say that the elections were conducted properly and were also correctly certified?
In that case, everything is fine.
But if 1/3 (plus a few idiots) vote for Trump and 1/3 don’t,
why is the remaining 1/3—who didn’t vote—ignored?
Wouldn’t it make more sense if all citizens who are eligible to vote were also required to vote, so that the final result isn’t skewed?
When I ask my family where we should go on vacation, everyone is included—no one is left out,that make sense for me.
Somehow, these elections don't strike me as logical or fair overall. Maybe I'm too stupid to understand them, but it seems like stupidity leads to more success in life—just look at Trump, who was elected after all.
I think the election system has significant flaws in its logic and undermines democracy, because real elections shouldn't really exist without the participation of all citizens.
The whole system stinks, but the elected officials love that smell...
If the election results are already rigged from the start because not everyone voted, then it’s also possible that only two citizens in the entire U.S. would vote and the rest wouldn’t.
If there are only two citizens who want to vote for the president and the rest don’t vote at all, then those two citizens would decide who gets elected and who doesn’t.
If one of those citizens is related to the president—or both are—then the whole election is unfair.
Something doesn’t add up here
For me, the little things are the hardest part to understand.
Chaos, on the other hand, is something you don't have to understand—otherwise, people will think you're stupid
