Gaming Does 8 mB Make a Difference?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 67birdman
  • Start date Start date
  • Views Views 2,288
  • Replies Replies 16

67birdman

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
May 25, 2008
Messages
441
Reaction score
2
Trophies
1
Age
31
Location
Vancouver, BC
XP
246
Country
Canada
Hi everyone,
I have a Toshiba A200 laptop:
2 GB Ram
Intel Core 2 Duo processor, 1.73 Ghz
ATI Video Card 120mb
Windows Vista Home Premium

Sorry about the specs, I don't have them on hand right now.
But anyways, I am using SystemRequirementsLab.com's check to see if you can run a game.
Everything shows up as fine, but for the video card, it says that I have only 120 mB of memory, and it needs 128 mB.
Does 8 mB really make a difference, can I still run these games?
Thanks
 
8MB of video memory probably won't make a difference. Your card can't make use of shared memory?

I'd be more worried about the actual graphical performance requirements of the game rather than video memory. What you might want to do is see the actual minimum required video card model, look up some 3DMark scores or something, and see how that compares to what your laptop can do.

Also, 120MB is weird. Maybe that's already including some shared memory?
 
120mb is very strange for a video card. It should be enough for video memory as the poster above me said.
You never mentioned the exact model name of the ATI card. If you check device manager it should give you the name. Chances are it could be some basic/low end integrated one. Unless it was a very high end laptop.
 
I can probably see that being a laptop in all, also its MB
8MB wont make a difference
 
I don't really know, its some ATI dedicated card, don't remember the name.
Thanks though.
wink.gif
 
I turns out I have an ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400.
Has 1.4 GB of video memory.
Too bad my processors only 1.5 ghz, i missed out on a lot of games
dry.gif
 
67birdman said:
I turns out I have an ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400.
Has 1.4 GB of video memory.
Too bad my processors only 1.5 ghz, i missed out on a lot of games
dry.gif
Really doubt it's 1.4GB of actual vram. It's most likely shared with your RAM.
 
Minox_IX said:
67birdman said:
I turns out I have an ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400.
Has 1.4 GB of video memory.
Too bad my processors only 1.5 ghz, i missed out on a lot of games
dry.gif
Really doubt it's 1.4GB of actual vram. It's most likely shared with your RAM.
Yea, I guess, still, my proccessor sucks
laugh.gif
 
1.5Ghz DOES suck XD
but its ok for playing general games isnt it?
I mean, i have 2 2.1GHz Processors, and a 512MB Graphics card, but mines expensive.

Waht game are you trying to run?
 
outgum said:
1.5Ghz DOES suck XD
but its ok for playing general games isnt it?
I mean, i have 2 2.1GHz Processors, and a 512MB Graphics card, but mines expensive.

Waht game are you trying to run?
LOL, Call of Duty 4..
 
Well the HD2400 is about the speed of a HD3200, so you shouldn't expect much - just low quality on a resolution like 1280*800
 
outgum said:
1.5Ghz DOES suck XD
but its ok for playing general games isnt it?
I mean, i have 2 2.1GHz Processors, and a 512MB Graphics card, but mines expensive.

Waht game are you trying to run?

My iMac: 1 3.06GHz Processor (two core), 4GB of RAM and a 256MB "ATI Radeon HD 4670" Graphics card.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum