Do I need to use ImgBurn to burn Wii/GC ISOs?

Discussion in 'Wii - Hacking' started by sofakng, Jul 8, 2007.

Jul 8, 2007
  1. sofakng
    OP

    Newcomer sofakng Advanced Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2007
    Messages:
    75
    Country:
    United States
    Do I need to use ImgBurn to burn Wii/GC ISOs?

    ...or can I use Nero / Alcohol 120%?

    If I MUST use ImgBurn, why? (I'm just curious...)

    Also, does burning the DVD at the slowest speed possible produce a better quality disc?

    Thanks for any help!
     
  2. Samutz

    Member Samutz Wet Tissue Sample

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2004
    Messages:
    1,598
    Location:
    See that hole in your wall?
    Country:
    United States
    I burn mine with Nero, but I get them by dumping them with Wiikey's dvd dumper. So it may be a different case depending on how you get your ISOs because they could be in a different format. You can always try it and see.

    Also, burning at slower speeds doesn't seem to always to be a good thing with the Wii. I started off burning at 2x (as that's what I do with PS2 games), but I started getting DREs constantly. So I started burning at 4x and 6x and got better results. You'll also get better results from better quality media, such as Memorex and Vertabim.
     
  3. aslacker55

    Member aslacker55 I like pie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2006
    Messages:
    631
    Location:
    So Cal
    Country:
    United States
    You do not have to use Imgbrn, it's just that people prefer to use it and that it's free. Nero or Alcohol 120% would be fine to use. Slow burning is not always the best solution, I find that burning at 4x is the best for me. Also I find that using good media is a better solution to making good backups ( I recommend either Taiyo Yuden premium line 8x DVD-R or Verbatim 16x DVD-R).
     
  4. Sick Wario

    Member Sick Wario Club Nintendo

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2006
    Messages:
    1,209
    Location:
    NNID: godrugal
    Country:
    United Arab Emirates
    nero here also. nero seems to burn very well for me, at 16x. letting it check for errors after burning makes it almost 100%. imgburn works well, but i get better and faster results with nero
    burning verb 16x +R with lg H22N and sony DRU800a
     
  5. 754boy

    Banned 754boy :D

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2002
    Messages:
    3,469
    Location:
    Mississippi
    Country:
    United States
    I burn all my stuff at 4x using both Imgburn and Nero. Doesn't really matter wat type DVDR media. I've been using some gold colored Maxells that Walgreen had on sale.
     
  6. Bloodgod

    Member Bloodgod 嵐の王

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2007
    Messages:
    806
    Country:
    United States
    IMGburn I see no reason why I need to open Nero. Plus IMGburn doesn't take alot of comp resources.
     
  7. DEF-

    Member DEF- GBAtemp Regular

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2003
    Messages:
    168
    Location:
    Sweden
    Country:
    Sweden
    IMGBurn is a much better burning application. Takes less system resources, its free and well updated. I usually get better burning results with it too, higher quality burns.
     
  8. jalaneme

    Member jalaneme Female Gamer

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2006
    Messages:
    6,247
    Location:
    London
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    i have both nero and imgburn and i use imgburn for wii & gamecube games because nero won't let me burn at a lower speed with my media type and burner, nero only lets me burn at 8x and imgburn lets me burn at any speed i want.
     
  9. Lazycus

    Member Lazycus Rotten

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2006
    Messages:
    871
    Country:
    United States
    I use Nero for Wii/GC with perfect results. How good is it? It's sofakng good!
     
  10. miikes

    Newcomer miikes Advanced Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2007
    Messages:
    73
    Country:
    Philippines
    actually, depending on your burner and media, you can't burn at slower speeds. with imgburn, even if you set it to 4x or less it can only burn at your burner/media combo's compatible speed.

    In my case, my burner won't burn 16x verbatims at speeds less than 6x (only burns at 6x, 8x,12x and 16x), so even if i set imgburn at 2x it will cheat and burn at 6x instead. just take a look the next time you burn at the data transfer speed as you're burning.

    On topic, I used to have nero for general use and imgburn for isos. but now I've found the wonders of burning studio (Ashampoo) and I've pretty much forgotten about nero (bloated piece of crap now) and imgburn (still have alcohol for virtual drives though). btw, my burner seems to work better at 8x/12x
     
  11. berlinka

    Member berlinka You have sustained a lethal injury.

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2003
    Messages:
    3,147
    Location:
    Harderwijk, Netherlands
    Country:
    Netherlands
    With my Wiikey I started with trying a DVD+R from Maxell I had lying around and burning it with 8x speed in Nero on my little notebook. I haven't had a single failure yet [​IMG] [​IMG] It's all working perfectly!
     
  12. hogg

    Member hogg GBAtemp Regular

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2005
    Messages:
    115
    Location:
    Santa Clarita, CA
    Country:
    United States
    One more vote for imgburn [​IMG]
     
  13. jalaneme

    Member jalaneme Female Gamer

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2006
    Messages:
    6,247
    Location:
    London
    Country:
    United Kingdom

    i'm gonna try that ashampoo program and see how it goes, it seems it doesn't get updated often though, and i'm pretty sure the burning speed is what i have chosen it to do, i will check next time i burn a disc with imgburn.
     
  14. imgod22222

    Member imgod22222 GBAtemp's Original No-faced Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2006
    Messages:
    1,555
    Country:
    United States
    If you use Nero, you have the option of having it check to see if it burned correctly. A very big plus for me.

    As for burning speed, there are two rules:
    1) Burn at the speed your media is rated for
    2) Burn at the slowest speed possible

    Just test with your burner. It varies. I get better results using #1. Lots of other people on the net get better results using method #2.
     
  15. adgloride

    Member adgloride Its A Wii Wario

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2003
    Messages:
    2,261
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    I've burned mine at x4 using Nero. Never had a bad burn yet.
     
  16. captain^k

    Member captain^k GBAtemp Regular

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2003
    Messages:
    124
    Country:
    New Zealand
    Thats what the "Verify" option in almost every single disc writing application does [​IMG]
     
  17. sofakng
    OP

    Newcomer sofakng Advanced Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2007
    Messages:
    75
    Country:
    United States
    Is there any disc quality advantage to using Nero or ImgBurn?

    I would imagine that either program would work exactly the same, no?

    Although, I do really like the simplier look/feel of ImgBurn...
     
  18. jalaneme

    Member jalaneme Female Gamer

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2006
    Messages:
    6,247
    Location:
    London
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    i never use verify it's far too slow i just wanna play the game lol
     
  19. nycwii

    Newcomer nycwii Advanced Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2007
    Messages:
    81
    Country:
    United States
    i use both imgburn and nero. They both give me a variety of options, that i can use at my disposal. if you can i would reccoment to try them both out and then deside which 1 suits ur needs


    goood luck [​IMG]
     
  20. ipeefreeli

    Newcomer ipeefreeli Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2007
    Messages:
    16
    Country:
    Canada
    Burn mine with Nero. IMGBurn has too many buffer underruns for some reason.
     

Share This Page