Homebrew Differences between SaveDataFiler and svdt?

[Real.96]

Can you tell me the differences between this two save game manager? which is best?

 

[Woody8275]

SaveDataFiler requires kernel access and con only be installed on 9.2 and below

 

[Purple_Heart]

in savedatafiler you have to search the games id (complicated if you have many cias installed)
svdt is booted via hbl and if you boot svdt it showes your installed games first (its easier to find the wished game)

 

[Real.96]

SaveDataFiler requires kernel access and con only be installed on 9.2 and below

But using an emuNAND it can't be considered a real difference.

in savedatafiler you have to search the games id (complicated if you have many cias installed)
svdt is booted via hbl and if you boot svdt it showes your installed games first (its easier to find the wished game)

This is really one of the big advantages that i didn't considered.

Is SaveDataFiler still updated? Because i found svdt thread and github page, but i didn't find the SaveDataFiler one.

 

[JJTapia19]

Is SaveDataFiler still updated? Because i found svdt thread and github page, but i didn't find the SaveDataFiler one.

Save data filler is an official nintendo sdk dev app.

 

[Purple_Heart]

savedatafiler is as far i know an app of nintendo which is found only on dev units normally

 

[Real.96]

Uh, ok. Thanks a lot!

 

[suloku]

Main difference is that savedatafiler can access 9.6+ games, the only downside is it doesn't display the names.