Emulation Cemu GUI Release v1.0.0

  • Thread starter Thread starter TOSanthony
  • Start date Start date
  • Views Views 69,457
  • Replies Replies 71
  • Likes Likes 12

What do you think about CemuGUI?

  • Good

    Votes: 1 100.0%
  • Bad

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    1
  • Poll closed .
Users should not have to rename their games!!

Any GUI that requires you to do so isn't worth using.

The GUI should be doing the work - NOT the end user!

Post screenshot of your gui with black cover

My gui searches the covers according to the code of the games, it uses the database of gametdb.com.

For covers, it searches in this order of language, us, en, fr, jp the versions cover full HQ
 
Last edited by TOSanthony,
Okay, Prove me wrong then,
I shouldn't have to since you're the one claiming it's infected.

CemuGUI.exe - Clean - Generic heuristics signatures, most likely because it's packed with UPX.
https://malwr.com/analysis/M2EzODM0ZGQ4ODdjNGNhZTk3ZmJiMzAwM2YzOTEzZmI/


Add Games.exe - Clean - Again, more generic heuristics signatures. The fact that this is also written in AutoIt probably attributes to these false positives.
https://malwr.com/analysis/Y2U4NTZkNWJlNDM0NDdkNmJmZWE1MTg2MTA5ZmU4NDc/

Software Update.exe - Clean - See above.
https://malwr.com/analysis/MjQwOTBmNWIxNmQzNGZhNmFiM2M1YWRkOWY0ZWRjMjk/

Now it's your turn to prove it is infected. Also, please stop formatting your posts like you're making an MS Word worksheet for first graders.
 
Last edited by Joom,
I am not the only one that is claiming that it is infected...

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/...d1f5f7f214d4f2c3ede1f6f4/analysis/1499489606/

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

I shouldn't have to since you're the one claiming it's infected.

CemuGUI.exe - Clean - Generic heuristics signatures, most likely because it's packed with UPX.
https://malwr.com/analysis/M2EzODM0ZGQ4ODdjNGNhZTk3ZmJiMzAwM2YzOTEzZmI/


Add Games.exe - Clean - Again, more generic heuristics signatures. The fact that this is also written in AutoIt probably attributes to these false positives.
https://malwr.com/analysis/Y2U4NTZkNWJlNDM0NDdkNmJmZWE1MTg2MTA5ZmU4NDc/

Software Update.exe - Clean - See above.
https://malwr.com/analysis/MjQwOTBmNWIxNmQzNGZhNmFiM2M1YWRkOWY0ZWRjMjk/

Now it's your turn to prove it is infected. Also, please stop formatting your posts like you're making an MS Word worksheet for first graders.

that site does not say anything about those virus and Trojans.
 
I am not the only one that is claiming that it is infected...

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/...d1f5f7f214d4f2c3ede1f6f4/analysis/1499489606/
Never trust VirusTotal. Use Malwr instead.
^

The links I posted also have VT results. Thing is, though, all the results are false positives triggered by catchall heuristics checks. I've already said this once. The fact that it's packed with UPX is the big one. Also, protip: Anti-viruses are snakeoil. Don't trust them and do your own research.

that site does not say anything about those virus and Trojans.

That's because this isn't a virus, you fool.
 
Last edited by Joom,
^

The links I posted also have VT results. Thing is, though, all the results are false positives triggered by catchall heuristics checks. I've already said this once. The fact that it's packed with UPX is the big one. Also, protip: Anti-viruses are snakeoil. Don't trust them and do your own research.



That's because this isn't a virus.

You can trust some of them Malwr is not trustworthy at all.
 
Last edited by Kat.ph.to.so.sx/login,
You can trust some of them
No, you can't. Malware crypters bypass detection. If you solely relied on an AV, you could get a crypted payload binded to something else that went completely under the radar. Someone could be in your system for months and you'd never know it because you relied on an AV instead of doing an actual analysis. In fact, it's really fishy when something scanned on VirusTotal has absolutely no detections. Typically something even legitimate things will have some kind of detection. If something has absolutely none then it'd be a good idea to run it through a a sandbox.
 
Last edited by Joom,
No, you can't. Malware crypters bypass detection. If you solely relied on an AV, you could get a crypted payload binded to something else that went completely under the radar. Someone could be in your system for months and you'd never know it because you relied on an AV instead of doing an actual analysis.

That is why i use a modified version of Kali. for virus scans or Avira rescue iso
 
Last edited by Kat.ph.to.so.sx/login,
Man your GUI is working fine, but it is always changing the CPU to Custom and disables all cores except core3, making games slow as hell! i have already changed the option of Intel HT. Why is that happening???
i Have a core I7 6700k
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum