Well, the most recognizable differences would be the way that they dress, and future of some of his teammates!!
In the book, they wear baggy black/dark clothes (if I recall very well, it has been a long time since I've read it)..
When they get into a fight with Billyboy, he had five more friends and there were only four of them, so it was a fight 6 vs. four, while in the movie, there were four of the both groups..and in the book, girl who was about to be raped by Billyboy and his "gang" wasn't older than 10, in the movie she was much more older..
There are many little details like that..
But I would say that movie fallows book pretty closely, movie is a bit more dark and brutal though..
And you're completely true about that Singing in the rain part Trolley!! It gives me goosebumps every time I see it!!
I've moved this to offtopic area, because we're seriously talking about the movie, I don't want no crappy posts in here
Yeah I noticed the age of the girl that Billy Boys gang had in the book, there's no way Kubrick could have got away with that scene with that young of a girl in it! In the book you keep getting reminded that they're all only 14 and 15, in the film they never really mention his age and none of them look 15 in the film. I don't think I could have stomached it if Kubrick kept it THAT faithful.
That Singing In The Rain bit sends shivers down my spine every time I see it. To me that's proper horror! The scene in the book while it's a lot smarter of a scene isn't half as chilling. One touch I loved though was they told you the name of the book he was writing, and it was A Clockwork Orange. I definitely don't think he would have got away releasing the movie if he'd have kept all the violence at the beginning in it. Another difference I found was in the book not all of the violence is senseless, they are actually little criminals at heart but in the film Alex is always on about how it just makes him happy!
I prefer the film version of the scene with his parole officer type guy. He comes across a little sleazy in the book but in the film he's like a full on creepy paedophile.
Toni Plutonij said:
I didn't actually try to correct you, but I have the book here, by my side, so I looked
I was interested..
The main point is, they're too young!!
And yeah, I've read Orwell's 1984 (funny thing, Burgess has written something like an "twist-off" if you get some time, try to read it, it's called 1985!!)..
I also read the Animal Farm, and I really like those books!! I can associate todays world with those stories!! And it's freakin' scary how good people predicted the future, and made psychological profile of the human!
Here, this is my "little collection" DVD and the book!! (I've taken the picture two minutes ago)
That cover is awesome! I think I might hunt it down and swap the official UK one for it, it's just the same as the poster. 1984 is another book I've never read, I'll probably pick that one up soon. I've seen the film but I kind of get the feeling the book will be alot deeper.
Animal Farm is one of my favourite books and films (not that mess of a movie released recently though) of all time. I watched the original cartoon not long ago. Such a dark dark tale but with such a strong moral and philosophy. I've always loved that kind of tale. It makes me sound like a proper old fart but they really don't make stories like these anymore. It's all popcorn stuff.
quim69 said:
QUOTE(TrolleyDave @ Nov 7 2008, 04:41 AM)
Shame it was banned in the UK for so long, a whole generation of UK film watchers missed out.
It was never banned - kubrik pulled it due to a (well founded) fear of idiots copying (or according to wikipedia due to threats to him and his family).
Within weeks of his death the studio had it for sale again. Shows how much they respected him. :|