Borderlands 2 confirmed for Vita.

  • Thread starter Thread starter stinkoman
  • Start date Start date
  • Views Views 3,034
  • Replies Replies 24

stinkoman

Magnificent Bastard
Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2008
Messages
1,227
Reaction score
327
Trophies
1
Location
Hell.
XP
555
Country
United States
V3OGfA9.jpg

It was announced just minutes ago at GamesCom.

Mirror said:
Talking of unwanted hardware, here’s the Vita!

That was a facetious joke, by the way. I love mine (hey - I was playing Killzone Mercenaries on it on the plane on the way over!). And I’ll love it even more when Borderlands 2 comes out.


Source
 
How exactly do first person shooters work on handhelds? I can't imagine even using my Playstation controller for Borderlands 2, but a handheld? That's even worse.


I suppose the touch panel on the back could be used instead of L2/R2 triggers. I don't see how it couldn't work.
 
I have 700+ hrs played on BL2, so i won't be interested in this.

I can't see it selling that well on the Vita, as the gamers who wanted this would already have it on their consoles/PC.
 
How exactly do first person shooters work on handhelds? I can't imagine even using my Playstation controller for Borderlands 2, but a handheld? That's even worse.

From what I played of the Killzone beta, FPS games should work out without sacrificing too much.
 
How exactly do first person shooters work on handhelds? I can't imagine even using my Playstation controller for Borderlands 2, but a handheld? That's even worse.

PSVita has the exact same button layout and analog sticks. The only difference is the lack of L2/R2/L3/R3 which are replaced by the touchscreen/touchpad so it's actually relatively comfortable.

EDIT: Brain Derp.
 
If you can imagine playing one on a PS3 controller, you can imagine playing it on the PSVita which has the exact same button layout and analog sticks. The only difference is the lack of L2/R2/L3/R3 which are replaced by the touchscreen/touchpad.
But I said I can't imagine playing on a PS3 controller. Console FPSes turn me off when I think about playing them without a mouse.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Attila13
Bunch of wieners. I have it on PC and have a ton of hours in it, but will still pick it up for the vita. Portable system > Desktops/Consoles.
 
But I said I can't imagine playing on a PS3 controller. Console FPSes turn me off when I think about playing them without a mouse.
He just said he couldn't.

Sorry, I've misread.

Well, in that case, no layout will really please you. I find it relatively comfortable myself, but nothing beats a mouse. :P
 
Sorry, I've misread.

Well, in that case, no layout will really please you. I find it relatively comfortable myself, but nothing beats a mouse. :P
Yeah, I'm sure I would have still enjoyed Borderlands 2 if it were a console exclusive (or handheld, for that matter), but I've put a bunch of hours into BL2 already (though not 700+ like eyes) so this'll be a pass for me.
 
Eh, it's a game only fun in multiplayer on a portable platform (so not optimal for multiplayer). Meh...

If it has crossplay it might be worth a consideration but otherwise... maybe when it's cheap.
 
Oddworld: Stranger's Wrath (partly FPS) plays quite good on Vita, and hell, I'd love to play Borderlands 2 on it, sounds freaking awesome.
Too bad I have almost 200h played on Steam, and I don't own a Vita myself.
Also, I wonder how a game so focused on Multiplayer will work out on a mobile device.
 
Oddworld: Stranger's Wrath (partly FPS) plays quite good on Vita, and hell, I'd love to play Borderlands 2 on it, sounds freaking awesome.
Too bad I have almost 200h played on Steam, and I don't own a Vita myself.
Also, I wonder how a game so focused on Multiplayer will work out on a mobile device.
While Borderlands 2 would be best played with other people, one could easily play 50+, or 100+ solo, depending on how many characters you play.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lismati

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum