Why?? This statement is not true at all.Never use exFAT on the Switch.
Day one switch owner here with SXOS and 512GB microSD formatted to exFAT. Been using it for awhile without any issues (no corruption no errors).
Why?? This statement is not true at all.Never use exFAT on the Switch.
Finally got some time here and yeah, had no luck here! =Z
I could get the SD working using the Tegra Explorer (for some reason, just by entering on it made the SD recognizable for the "boot.dat" issue but, the problem got into the main games later on
Got some games into the "sxos" folder as usual, and, when accessing it on the Sxos image album menu, it just locks it up, not getting anywhere else from there, forcing me to reset the switch
Maybe it´s a problem with the card´s size (256 GB), don´t know if that´s too big for sxos (which is curious, cause it reads the external drives just fine)
It is.Why?? This statement is not true at all.
Day one switch owner here with SXOS and 512GB microSD formatted to exFAT. Been using it for awhile without any issues (no corruption no errors).
I have a homebrew that patches FF VIII game files to install Polish translation on Switch. In 5/5 cases FAT32 showed no CRC error while exFAT 3 out of 5 (librsync checks CRC of file it saved before continuing and compares them with CRC stored in xdelta diff. If they are not matching, librsync throws error).The problem is that everyone has been stating this as fact for years and no one has ever (correct me if I'm wrong) done any proper controlled experiment for real evidence. It's all anecdotal and spread like gospel because enough people have repeated it that it's believed to be true. I wish someone would just do the research and publish it.