Yes, while Apple did give the market the kickstart, it's now trying to kill off all other competitors. That's no fun.
Variety is good.
Variety is good.
Oh, why of course! Competition is the motor of progress and I'm all for it! I just think that it has to be healthy competition, and Apple likes to play dirty. They have a horrible habit of "patenting black rectangles" as I call it, and by doing this they really stall proper progress.The iPhone still reinvented the smartphone market. It became more data centric, they added a centralised app store with active developers, they made a touch screen interface that wasn't a complete faff to use. Without the iPhone the smartphone market wouldn't exist as it is now. The fact that it was "obsolete" the day it released didn't matter. It gave the market the kickstart it needed. Maybe without the iPhone Android would've still released but I don't think it would have become as big as it is because it wouldn't have had a giant to compete against.
I agree with you completely. Just trying to nip any and all complete Apple flaming in the bud.Oh, why of course! Competition is the motor of progress and I'm all for it! I just think that it has to be healthy competition, and Apple likes to play dirty. They have a horrible habit of "patenting black rectangles" as I call it, and by doing this they really stall proper progress.The iPhone still reinvented the smartphone market. It became more data centric, they added a centralised app store with active developers, they made a touch screen interface that wasn't a complete faff to use. Without the iPhone the smartphone market wouldn't exist as it is now. The fact that it was "obsolete" the day it released didn't matter. It gave the market the kickstart it needed. Maybe without the iPhone Android would've still released but I don't think it would have become as big as it is because it wouldn't have had a giant to compete against.
Most people? Surely not watches. I ,for one, didn't have any of those,but a phone.I'm ok with phones having so many stuff, but it seems really pointless, phones can photograph and record, well, most people probably have digital cameras with better quality, they play songs, most people already have a music specific device, they have clocks and calendars, when most people usually have a watch...
As long as their are no robots to go berserk im good. Yay future!Most people? Surely not watches. I ,for one, didn't have any of those,but a phone.I'm ok with phones having so many stuff, but it seems really pointless, phones can photograph and record, well, most people probably have digital cameras with better quality, they play songs, most people already have a music specific device, they have clocks and calendars, when most people usually have a watch...
In the future, safe advance Project glass -like glasses with electronic gloves would probably replace phones and even tablets.
If advance and effective enough, maybe even laptops.
If not, there's always holograms.
It helps to make a product that's better than everything on the market.To be honest I don't know how Apple is successful.
Then do it again.
It will never be a monopoly. Apple has it's competitors and it still has overpriced shit. To be honest I don't know how Apple is successful. I guess Apple sure knows how to build a fanbase.Steve Jobs is dead, let it go Apple.
Go get'em Google
Someone has to sue Apple for anti-competitiveness
Apple is trying to be like Microsoft as far as becoming a monopoly. I'm not a lawyer, but I'm pretty sure anti-competitiveness is illegal. Plus they're the ultimate patent and copyright trolls.
It will never be a monopoly. Apple has it's competitors and it still has overpriced shit. To be honest I don't know how Apple is successful. I guess Apple sure knows how to build a fanbase.Steve Jobs is dead, let it go Apple.
Go get'em Google
Someone has to sue Apple for anti-competitiveness
Apple is trying to be like Microsoft as far as becoming a monopoly. I'm not a lawyer, but I'm pretty sure anti-competitiveness is illegal. Plus they're the ultimate patent and copyright trolls.
2 main reasons on why Apple is successful. First cuz they have one of the best publicity departments in the world and second and more important cuz Apple fanboys are IDIOTS. Why do I say that? Simple, cuz for every product Apple releases there is a BETTER product from another company that does what Apple does and much more. For example. Apple had for some time the Ipod nano, it had no screen and no radio, here comes Sandisk and releases one of the best mini portable mp3s, the sansa clip, had a screen AND radio yet Apple fanboys ran to buy the nano.... why? cuz of what I just said on top...
It will never be a monopoly. Apple has it's competitors and it still has overpriced shit. To be honest I don't know how Apple is successful. I guess Apple sure knows how to build a fanbase.Steve Jobs is dead, let it go Apple.
Go get'em Google
Someone has to sue Apple for anti-competitiveness
Apple is trying to be like Microsoft as far as becoming a monopoly. I'm not a lawyer, but I'm pretty sure anti-competitiveness is illegal. Plus they're the ultimate patent and copyright trolls.
2 main reasons on why Apple is successful. First cuz they have one of the best publicity departments in the world and second and more important cuz Apple fanboys are IDIOTS. Why do I say that? Simple, cuz for every product Apple releases there is a BETTER product from another company that does what Apple does and much more. For example. Apple had for some time the Ipod nano, it had no screen and no radio, here comes Sandisk and releases one of the best mini portable mp3s, the sansa clip, had a screen AND radio yet Apple fanboys ran to buy the nano.... why? cuz of what I just said on top...
Ipod Nano always had a screen.
You know, that's the problem with anti-Apple fanboys, more often than not they simply criticize something they actually have no idea about. You know if you have a terrible attitude about something before doing it or experiencing it yourself, it tends give you a negative opinion of it regardless of what happened. That's called being close minded.