Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Switch - Exploits, Custom Firmwares & Soft Mods' started by MonMonz, Jan 12, 2018.
Good things come to those who wait my friend
Looking forward to any news about this 2.x stuff from you guys
I guess that as time goes by their team either found more bugs/exploits for lower versions of firmware, or some known exploits become safe to get disclosed publicly and something related will be released soon. There are always new findings on old firmware from time to time, even a lot effort and time is spent on new firmware.
Daeken has told people to update, because in the short term 3.0 gets HB immediately.
I've been telling people not to update, because CFW/emuNAND is more interesting to me -- I want a customized Switch OS and homebrew with full hardware control. And for those things, as I have said a lot, lower is always better. Full stop, end of story.
Different goals, thus different statements.
Well, in 3.0.0 nintendo changed some keys, but it doesn't mean that something big is coming.
Idk if it was mentioned here.
Good < better < best
3.0.0 < 2.X.X < 1.0.0
(HB) < (HB) < (HB, CFW/emuNAND)
1.0.0 os the golden FW, but stay as low as possible for some yummy stuff.
dont forget tx solution
I don't care about that. I don't want to pay to acces piracy
you paid for the console though. thats access right ?
If the only thing that 2.X will allow is HB, there is no reason not to update to 3.0.0, which will probably have a developed homebrew scene. Read SciresM comments, for me it seems that he is mentioning CFW/emuNAND possibility for 2.X.
I had a 2.x switch but I sold out, because this whole hoarding and teasing reminds me too much of the DSi.
I'm not going to be some devs wet dream.
Sad to see that people can't enjoy a game system without needing hacks on it.
Access to hardmod does not necessary mean access to piracy.
Buing switch does not necessary mean access to piracy.
Btw, if you buy PSVita (that is somehow 3.61 and higher) it won't give you access to piracy at all.
Xecuter does not necessary mean access to piracy.
If they have their own cfw, they can do much more than that.
Look at their history. They were always doing it for money because of piracy.
— Posts automatically merged - Please don't double post! —
He never mentioned cfw/emunand for 2.X. He might be teasing it, but never said that.
(Or maybe he said it somewhere and I am blind )
Good job calling the devs morons
Love me some good old cock teasing. Like what's so hard about saying I'm working on XYZ?
Yeah he never mentioned it specifically. But before he wrote that it is also relevant for 3.0.0, it seems that there was something in 2.X that get you one step closer to CFW/emunand. I didn't mean that is is known for sure that there will be CFW/emunand for 2.X. (That is what I meant when I used the word "possibility". As I understand, for now there isn't any known kernelhax for 2.X, which is required for that). Sorry if anyone misunderstood that.
If I understand correctly, the new ability gives you control over pretty much all the services, which mean better homebrew and bigger vector for kernel hax.
still only known kernelhax are on 1.0.0 and nothing else then homebrew is confirmed for 2.X and higher.
And everyone is being so secretive we can't tell if there is any other exploits or not. The switch scene is as garbage as the DSi scene after rocketlauncher was announced as coming soon (either months ago now)
TX is probably going to be the best hope for most people. It's a shame that it's a commercial product. The 1.0.0 hax could have been released ages ago, because if they are blocked already then there is no reason to withhold them. Apart from as some form of control.