CannonFoddr said:
berlinka said:
CannonFoddr said:
By keeping all the info to himself and the AKAIO team - we can be assurred that the coding has been done to AKAIO specification EXACTLY
But WHY does the team (Normmatt I suppose) need to keep EVERYTHING to himself???
I thought I explained it above - If the info is given out then everyone who can program would produce their own versions of AKAIO & it's loaders, & if the programming isn't done right then further Bugs/Crashes etc will occur causing more headaches for the 'offical' development team - by keeping the programming/development team small there's less chance of this happening
Think of it this way - Why are Apple MACs more 'stable' than PC's ??
It's because a MAC is built one and only one way, using only one limited set of components
- while a PC has many different component made by many different manufacturer's made to slightly different specifications, all trying to 'work together' by using various drivers to allow each component to communicate with each OTHER component - & if a conflict of specifications occurs we end up with bugs/conflicts
If anyone remembers Win98 - how many times did they install a program THEN find out that another program they had didn't work because the required DLL wasn't the correct one - this was because the newer program installed a dll overwritting the 'proper' dll that their older program needed - Well I do
Yeah, but no..Firstly, not every other coder besides the AKAIO team is stupid, incompetent or can't follow simple releasing procedures. Normmatt isn't the be-all and end-all of coders. If the AKAIO team released the source, then only good could come from it. Firstly, game fixes could be fixed faster, they could then be submitted to the AKAIO team to be included in their next official release (lessening the work the team does), else they could be released on an independent basis (depending on the license that came with the source) and people would know these aren't official and therefore could be buggy. I don't see a problem with this.
Secondly, your analogy is completely wrong. Your statement here "It's because a MAC is built one and only one way, using only one limited set of components" is true but not in the context of the analogy, this is
hardware, not software which is what we should be comparing. The reason Macs, in your opinion, are more 'stable' than Windows (don't use the term PC
You can compile a version of Gentoo for any PC if you want a full OS that is customized to your hardware) if due to the standardization of hardware, however Acekard's hardware is standardized across all Acekards (well, except for the R.P.G etc methinks), if the AKAIO source was only used to update and make releases for the Acekard then your point is irrelevant. Even if someone did try to port it to another flashcart, I'm sure people using it would be weary of it and not expect it to be as fully fledged as the original, so I see no problem with this. Also, if the AKAIO team simply released a license with the source stating they don't want unofficial ports to other flashcarts then I'm sure people would comply.
That's just my opinion though. I am a new Acekard user and I love AKAIO and respect Normmatt and the team. Also, I believe in open-source philosophies as you have probably detected
tl;dr your argument boils down to, People beside the AKAIO team are too stupid to code properly and will release something buggy and crap. Also, the public is too stupid to handle a buggy, unofficial AKAIO ported to another card and this would cause problems for the official AKAIO team (for some reason) even though it would be pretty obvious the releaser and the AKAIO team are seperate entities