Ethics/moralality of using AI for fanfics

Schizophrenic meltdown amirite
View attachment 581834
Yes, it’s a complete schizophrenic meltdown, not dissimilar to the one we’ve seen when the first engines entered production during the industrial revolution. I Googled who Victor Tangermann is and I could swear I tasted the soy through the screen, I had to grab some mouthwash.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: hippy dave
Yes, it’s a complete schizophrenic meltdown, not dissimilar to the one we’ve seen when the first engines entered production during the industrial revolution. I Googled who Victor Tangermann is and I could swear I tasted the soy through the screen, I had to grab some mouthwash.
And talking about soy makes you sound totes rational and normal.
 
And talking about soy makes you sound totes rational and normal.
Of course it does, especially considering it’s true. The man writes for Futurism and his core output is limited to a few things - critique of AI and associated prominent industry figures (notable hate boner for Elon Musk), aerospace (notable hate boner for SpaceX) and environmentalism. I don’t really know what he’s doing at the publication considering he worships regress, not progress, at least based on a fast skim read of some of his articles. He’s a textbook “sky is falling” yellow journalist who misses the forest for the trees.

I have a spoiler for you - much like other technological advancements such as the steam engine, the diesel engine, or automation in general, AI isn’t going anywhere. The opposite is true - it’s actively proliferating in every industry and its use will only grow with time. In fact, the increase in productivity is so enormous that the companies involved in building the backbone of LLM’s are perfectly happy, and expected, to operate at a loss so long as they achieve their targets, and their investors know this, have priced this risk in and continue to be undeterred.

AI is actively helping us solve all sorts of problems, from science, engineering and medicine to simple everyday tasks, and the fact that the general public has access to such tools so early in their development is actually quite staggering - normally access to new breakthroughs is prohibitively expensive. Nobody, allow me to repeat, nobody who matters in this equation actually cares about the current drawbacks *more* than they care about what the use of AI can provide us with, so progress will continue along the exact same path as with other technological milestones - the scale will grow and efficiency will increase over time until equilibrium is reached. There will be a *technological* solution to environmental grumbles, nobody’s pulling the plug on LLM’s.

You can make peace with that or you can shake your fist and shout at clouds. Thinking otherwise is simply myopic and insane, so the phrase “schizophrenic meltdown” is apt. You were preceded by people who chased tractors with pitchforks because they threatened their employment in agriculture. We still have tractors, and we’re better off with them than without them.
 
tl;dr
Post automatically merged:

a68tnxyg60dh1.png
 
Last edited by hippy dave,
tl;dr
Post automatically merged:

View attachment 582107
Yes, all valid points. I’m not even an AI evangelist and I concur. I’m sorry that your attention span is too short to read the post. Consider using an AI to produce a summary, it’s pretty handy for that too.
 
Saying "I can't find inspiration for writing so someone else did it for me." would not get a pass so why should the Predictive Text Generator Machine Pretending to be Artificial Intelligence be allowed to excrete any of that?
There are different ways to use it. OP wasn't clear on whether he's having it write for him or just using it to bounce ideas around.
If you're having it write everything for you then you are not a writer, that should be obvious to anyone, it's kind of in the name.

Using it to bounce ideas around I'd say is perfectly acceptable and moral. Every writer struggles with writers block on occasion and having someone (or something) to bounce ideas at and get potentially helpful suggestions can be a good way to get past that and is a pretty common practice. The suggestions don't even have to be directly useful, but just the act of bouncing ideas around may make you come up with new ideas that you hadn't thought of before.
There's obviously a spectrum inbetween that where things are less clear cut but those are the two extremes.
 
Last edited by The Real Jdbye,
80% of fiction is inspired by true events that already happened just adjusted "what if's" are thrown in by the author. Regardless of what the work is an idea might've been added to a universe they got from someone else.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum