as if it were easy to buy something that you'll barely use and will only buy because of the exclusives and nothing else
Then don't.
I want to beleive that you're old enough to know that you can't have everything you want.
if you think that, then you are cruel and I believe you participate in flamewars
Did not understand this (and at this point, don't care).
just answer me:
Even so, does it make you happy that fewer people will be able to experience a series of games that you like and love?
Not really, I don't think every series (films/games/books/sculptures/paintings/arquitectures/food) are for everyone, so no.
well, but not everyone can have more than one platform and who told you that this is normal? especially when one platform is their main platform and the other they're buying, because technically, they're being forced to buy to play what they want to play
Isn't this true like for everything?
If you want some kind of food from one restaurant, you go to that restaurant.
- aaw, but I want to buy it on the beach
- Too bad, my food is cooked and consumed in my restaurant
- I want to watch this movie on my living room
- Too bad, it was made to be seen on a cinema, won't release it elsewhere because of artistic reasons
- I want listen to my band live on my country/city/pub
- Too bad, the band doesn't want to/can't go to that country/city/pub
For software is a bit different, but a similiar approach could be expressed.
Anyway, the owner decides the conditions under which the software is published/used.
I mean, just check a LOT of the software there is
- I want to use Office on linux
- Too bad, MS Windows only
(recently it's been less of a problem, but it's the same idea)