Last Seen Movie

  • Thread starter Thread starter JuanMena
  • Start date Start date
  • Views Views 221,932
  • Replies Replies 1,442
  • Likes Likes 5
Baby Boy - A pretty funny hood movie, coming-of-age even though the main character was an adult, albeit 20 years old. I'm not sure if the movie was supposed to be funny, but I laughed quite a bit from it. I didn't like Tyrese Gibson's character, but his performance was so good and the end of his arc was lovely. Taraji P. Henson's performance does a lot to make such a submissive character entertaining. Snoop Dogg was decent, AJ Johnson was nice. The supporting cast on this is impressive. My absolute favorite performance was from Ving Rhames. He was funny, a little quirky, and so charismatic. An unconventionally awesome father figure. The movie is the last in John Singleton's Hood Trilogy. It's also the last film he wrote and directed. He would direct 3 more films, but didn't write them. The fact this ended his Hood Trilogy stuck with me. It was to the point where I was forgiving some of the narrative and character flaws. There's just something magnetic about this movie, and I was engaged for the fairly long 2 hour runtime. It feels like John Singleton's swansong, even though it's technically not. It does link up nicely with Poetic Justice and Boys n the Hood. They're movies with somewhat messy narratives, but the storytelling is passionate, and the craft is impressive. The editing and cinematography in Baby Boy is very nice. The soundtrack's also cool, quite a bit of Snoop Dogg unenterprisingly. I was torn on what rating to give it, but I'm feeling especially nice. So it gets an 8/10.

Training Day - King Kong ain't got shit on this movie! Aw man, I loved revisiting this. I think it had been 15 years since I first watched it, and the movie has seemingly gotten better with age. It's now seen as a hood classic. I did go into this latest viewing believing that Denzel Washington would absolutely rule. He did, but I think it's a 2-hander movie with Ethan Hawke delivering. There was a point halfway through the movie where Hawke's character's lip quivers. That stuck with me, it was a turning point for me because from that point on, he really got as close to Denzel's level as possible. He basically dominates the 2nd half of the movie anyway as Denzel disappears for a good chunk. The movie was David Ayer's big breakout as a screenwriter, which led to him graduating to director. The style he exhibited in this film influenced crime/thrillers that followed it, as well as informing his work in the 2000s. Pretty much the stuff he did before Suicide Squad showed how great of a filmmaker he was. But to this day, Training Day is the best thing he ever worked on. This surpasses his directorial efforts. His script demonstrated street knowledge, but Antoine Fuqua's direction gave the film so many legs to stand on. He added a lot of grit to the film, and the chemistry he had with Denzel Washington opened the door for that man to really play. I think Training Day is the most Denzel Washington performance, which unsurprisingly means it's one of his best performances. An Oscar win that's so well deserved, and I think it has aged beautifully. Maybe at the time, Russell Crowe for A Beatiful Mind would've been great, but Denzel's performance in Training Day is more worthy of being remembered in that context. I was in awe of his performance. He was absolutely captivating. Other members of the cast were great. Some rappers and prolific supporting actors such as Noel Gugliemi delivered some memorable moments. This was one Terry Crews' first films, opening the door for him to have a great career. I really love this movie. The acting, the pacing, the intensity, it all just worked. Some silly plot conveniences that go against the heightened realism of the script, but the movie is an undeniable beast. It's surgical with this bitch. 9/10

Tales From the Hood
- A darkly funny horror anthology that actually says some real shit. Each story is an effective commentary on the traumas Black suffer. Police brutality, racism, domestic abuse, gang/gun violence. Maybe there's some heavy-handedness, but the storytelling is very fun. It seems to get more serious as the movie progressed, with the last story being a real doozy. Some of the visual effects are nice, some are very silly, but always charming. The cast here is really good. Because of watching so many 90s hood movies this month, I'm already very familiar with much of the cast, such as Joe Torry, who was in Poetic Justice. Roger Guenveur Smith was also in Poetic Smith, he's in this. Samuel Monroe Jr was in Menace II Society. Clarence Williams wasn't in anything I saw recently, but I remember him from Reindeer Games and Deep Cover, the latter of which Roger Guenveur Smith was in. David Alan Grier in a rare non-comedic role was in this. Wings Hauser, who passed away last year, was a nasty bastard in this. He was best as a villain. Amazingly, the redhead who was in Samurai Cop has a brief appearance in this! I immediately recognized her. She didn't talk though. The soundtrack here was very good. My favorite song on here easily was Born II Die from Spice 1. Anyway, this was my first Rusty Cundieff film. It certainly won't be the last. 8/10

Da 5 Bloods
- It had been a year since I watched a Spike Lee film and boy was this a reminder of his style. The opening montage features Vietnam War footage, mutilated bodies, people murdered, Civil Rights icons talking, things that hammer on home what this movie's backdrop is. The editing can be spastic at times. Dialogue is charged up and delivered in a way that's practically direct at the audience. Even down to actors talking right into the camera. The famous double dolly shot is used. The script originally was about old white Vietnam vets, so Spike Lee was able to fully configure that to match his vision for Treasures of the Sierra Madre-type movie. And that's another thing, he wears his influences on his sleeve, with that and Apocalypse Now being so apparent. I was able to get into this type of directing, but found myself more captivated when the actors just got to play and there's a lot of breathing room. And the person who captivated me the most was Delroy Lindo. His performance here was absolutely fantastic. He was the main reason I wanted to watch this movie. This performance was smubbed at the Oscars. That's criminal, there was plenty of room for the guy. The movie came out in 2020, which was a weird year for movies. That goes without saying. The safest category for him would've been Best Supporting Actor, but he's in the movie a lot, and is even billed first. So I could've seen him in the Lead Actor category. Anyway, the quality of acting is kind of dictated by experience working with Spike Lee. Because Lindo has worked with him on multiple films, that experience paid off. He was the perfect vessel for Spike Lee's particular storytelling, while also being compelling in his own right. The recent Sinners nomination makes up for this egregious snub. Kind of, his performance in Sinners is so small compared to this one.

The other old men did a great job, Jonathan Majors was very good and could've been a great regular for Spike Lee films, and it was nice seeing Jean Reno after so many years. His accent was a little distracting because it sounded like he was instructed to make his English sound more flavored by French. Or maybe he hadn't spoken English in a while and thus sounded less fluent. Chadwick Bosemen has a small role, but an amazing one. This was the last film that released while he was alive, and I interpreted it as a eulogy of sorts. His character died in the Vietnam War, so much of the movie is flashing back to him, remembering him. The white actors were okay, but nowhere near as good as the older Black actors. Paul Walter Hauser really stuck out here, he was such a goober. The narrative is sometimes clunky, with some breaks in tone that take me out of the film a bit. It would be so damn cheesy at times, and the final act of the movie is suddenly action-packed, almost like a Rambo shootout scene. That's funny since they crapped on Rambo and Missing in Action earlier in the movie. The movie also took a long time to wrap up. It's definitely a flawed film, but it hits so hard at points, and the acting really carries it. Certain visual choices are great, and Spike Lee's directing was still mostly sharp. I didn't feel the runtime at all, which was a major concern going into the movie. The score is the only thing that got an Oscar nomination, which is crazy because I think it's one of the weakest aspects of the movie! It's not bad, but it sounds very familiar, especially with the wartime kind of music used. Plus the heavy use of Marvin Gaye overshadows the original music. Marvin Gaye's basically the voice of the movie.

It was also nice to watch a movie that shits on Donald Trump. "President Bone Spurs. Reality TV Clown." It's also crazy to watch this the day after Tales From the Hood because that film also has a montage using graphic archive photos. They were mostly lynchings and other acts of violence committed against Black people. But it hits the same tone as this film. Spike Lee was the executive producer of Tales From the Hood. Anyway, overall, Da 5 Bloods is a very good movie. Delroy Lindo was the MVP. 8/10

Hollywood Shuffle
- A great comedy made by Robert Townsend. The story of how he made it is so admirable, a lovely indie filmmaking journey. Importantly, it was the first film Keenen Ivory Wayans worked on. He was the co-screenwriter. That led to I'm Gonna Git You Sucka, which led to In Loving Color, which led to major careers for Marlon Wayans and Shawn Wayans, which led to Don't Be a Menace to South Central While Drinking Your Juice in the Hood and the first 2 Scary Movies. I just love discovering that Hollywood Shuffle and Robert Townsend planted those seeds. Right after watching the movie, I finished watching the 4 hour Tyler Perry video from FD Signifier, which referenced Townsend and Hollywood Shuffle. Watching this movie, you can tell that it's written by a Wayans brother with the sharp and pointed spoof humor. I think Townsend put a lot of heart in the movie. The main narrative is very nice and endearing, but I think the movie shines best in the sketches. It's very short and sweet, only 81 minutes. 8.5/10

House Party
- It was a party alright. This was a very fun teen comedy, seemingly the midpoint between Animal House and Superbad. It feels more lively and dazzling than Superbad, in my opinion. There's a colorful cast of characters, entertaining subplots, and an amazing soundtrack. That includes the rapping sections from Kid n' Play, Kid even has solo rap performances. The dancing is also nice, and the cinematography is so clean. It was consistently funny, with almost every notable character being entertaining. Kid n' Play were good in their own right. Martin Lawrence and Tisha Campbell were so charismatic and funny. Robin Harris was hilarious, he sadly passed away the year this came out. You can tell who were the veteran comedians as they would basically go off without any interruption. Harris did that, as well as John Witherspoon! It was a treat to see him, though like Hollywood Shuffle, his role is very small. It's wild seeing actors I just saw recently. For example, AJ Johnson and Clifton Powell were in Baby Boy and Menace II Society, respectively. Powell was also in Dead Presidents. I really didn't expect to watch Powell multiple times this month, but I was totally fine with it. Ludi C. Washington was in Hollywood Shuffle, his role here is much smaller. I recognized Desi Arnez Hines II from Boyz n the Hood, another small role. The Full Force guys were also entertaining. Another musician who was part of the cast was George Clinton, though he's only in one scene. Of course Parliament is on the soundtrack. So is Flava Flav, Eric B. & Rakim, and Full Force. Oh and I am familiar with Daryl Mitchell. It's pretty cool that this movie is now in the Criterion Collection. It's really a creative and energetic comedy. I read that the movie was originally offered to Will Smith and DJ Jazzy Jeff. I wonder how that would've played out. Anyway, I really enjoyed this movie. I think it's an essential hip-hop movie, a snapshot of 1990 with the 80s vibes still going strong, and the 90s being previewed. 8/10

Don't Be a Menace to South Central While Drinking Your Juice in the Hood
- This was designated as the final film I watch in this Black History Month that covered most of the hood movies spoofed by the Wayans. This is a childhood favorite, I've seen Don't Be a Menace so many times. I think the last time I watched it was 2015. A long time, but so many moments from it have been burned in my brain that I'd vividly recall them for weeks before this viewing. So yeah, there was no way this movie would not hold up. I had an absolute blast watching this. I think it works as a standalone comedy where you don't have to get all the references. That's how it was for me during childhood. Hell, this movie also works as a comedic summary of those hood movies. I was essentially introduced to Boyz n the Hood and Menace II Society through this movie. As this was my first time watching the movie after seeing all those hood movies, it felt a little more fresh. I was able to quickly recognize the references, and was even blown away of the smallest details. I think how much of a movie was spoofed indicates how great it was. So Boyz n the Hood and Menace II Society were the best films since it got spoofed so much. The framework of both movies was adapted here. South Central got some of the least spoofs, indicating how poor that movie is. Then again, Juice barely got parodied and that's a great movie. Higher Learning wasn't touched on as much as others, but how they spoofed it was brilliant! This is one of the funniest movies I've ever seen. Despite dozens of viewings, I was still able to laugh so many damn times. It reached the point of crying and hurting my throat!This is top-notch Wayans Brothers comedy. The attention to detail is amazing despite them goofing off a lot. Marlon Wayans said that Keenen made him and Shawn write drafts of the script until they were tears. After 27 rewrites, the script was approved. That amount of fine-tuning is very clear in this movie. It's very tight with the perfect rhythm and runtime at just about 89 minutes. It never overstays its welcome, no sequences run on too long, and it never has me not smiling! Perhaps an acquired taste as the Wayans aren't universally loved. Some jokes are homophobic, but the movie holds up really well. It's 30 years old and this kind of nonstop comedy is very rare these days, and the ones from recent times go straight to streaming anyway. The soundtrack is also great. One thing the previous hood movies didn't have is Wu Tang! This movie has Wu Tang! I know some of the movies came out before Wu Tang Clan came on the scene, but still, that's a quintessential hip-hop icon from the 90s and this movie has that representation. Granted, it's a few members of Wu Tang Clan. The point still stands. Anyway, Don't Be a Menace is a comedic masterpiece in my opinion. 10/10
 
Last edited by RustInPeace,
EDTV... NOT!

MV5BNzA3ZjZlNzYtMTdjMy00NjMzLTk5ZGYtMTkyYzNiOGM1YmM3XkEyXkFqcGc@._V1_.jpg


My, Dr. Quinn looks a lot different here :huh:
 
  • Love
Reactions: CoolMe
Ah, right?
Kaufman is good too.

I often forget Carrey did "serious" roles too.
Man on the Moon, didn't like it, not his performance mind you, just the story and the whole movie just isn't interesting to me, so doesn't get the rewatch treatment. i rewatched Truman & Eternal Sunshine countless times, obv his comedic stuff Dumb & Dumber, Ace Ventura are all classics, even his second rate stuff like Bruce Almighty, Yes Man are good, but Man on the Moon just doesn't do anything for me (and i even like Cable Guy..)
I feel as though Jim Carrey shines best in his serious and dramatic roles. One of my favorite movies of his happens to be Eternal Sunshine Of The Spotless Mind. I'm a sucker for dramas and romance films.
agreed, even though he gave those serious roles his best shot, the industry kept throwing only comedy roles at him (because that's the JC they want), and he probably lost interest years ago & was too tired of that persona by that point, hence his hiatus after Mr. Popper (which was utter dogshit)..
 
Man on the Moon, didn't like it, not his performance mind you, just the story and the whole movie just isn't interesting to me, so doesn't get the rewatch treatment. i rewatched Truman & Eternal Sunshine countless times, obv his comedic stuff Dumb & Dumber, Ace Ventura are all classics, even his second rate stuff like Bruce Almighty, Yes Man are good, but Man on the Moon just doesn't do anything for me (and i even like Cable Guy..)

agreed, even though he gave those serious roles his best shot, the industry kept throwing only comedy roles at him (because that's the JC they want), and he probably lost interest years ago & was too tired of that persona by that point, hence his hiatus after Mr. Popper (which was utter dogshit)..
If Jim Carrey were a lot younger, do you know what role would have given him an oscar had they got a serious director behind the project? If only martin scorsese made a max payne movie with carrey in the role. I feel that it would have gotten him up there with the all time great actors like Dicaprio. Or maybe James McCaffrey would have made a great max payne movie instead of the crap we got with wahlberg. It sucks that McCaffrey never really got noticed more since I felt that he was a great actor and very underrated. Shame that he died. :(
 
  • Like
Reactions: CoolMe
Shrek
Probably haven't seen it again since it was new, so I didn't remember any of the details, and it still felt fresh and fun. CGI has come a long way since this one tho, will be interesting to see how much it improves over the series.

I still say the "that'll do, donkey" thing sometimes, and also discovered that I might have got the habit of responding to "really?" with "really really" from this movie too - tho that could just be more generic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CoolMe
1772820650531.png
1772820850603.png



Started off nice [not great, but nice], Middle bored me. ending made me cry.

Truly something I wanted to do to my fam and friends that forsaken me after my tour of duties, but didn't.


Then I watched,

1772821443121.png


For the hell of it,
 
  • Angry
  • Wow
Reactions: Flame and CoolMe
Mona Lisa - I viewed this as a subversive neo-noir. Bob Hoskins played an ex-con who chauffeurs a high-end Black sex worker. He basically becomes a private detective, searching for this sex worker's companion. The sex worker, played by Cathy Tyson, is the femme fatale. Of course, the protagonist falls in love with this person. His story is basically the desire and need for tenderness, love, and redemption. The movie doesn't truly give Bob Hoskins that...until the third act. That was when the movie stumbled. I enjoyed how the movie twisted neo-noir trademarks and the coverage of the London sex worker scene, specifically King's Cross, is so fascinating and gritty. Unfortunately, the third act makes Bob Hoskins into a total shitbag, but gives him a happy ending, while the victims, the femme fatale included, isn't given such an ending. Her last scene in the movie is was miserable, while Bob Hoskins basically rode into the sunset. I can see why this is in the Criterion Collection and why it's been highly regarded. Bob Hoskins got an Oscar nomination for this, which is deserved. His performance is fantastic. Cathy Tyson was great, as was Michael Caine. His role was small, but Caine's an expert at making small roles very impactful. Clarke Peters, who I recently saw in Da 5 Bloods, had a sinister role here that was sadly not fleshed out and overshadowed. It was crazy to see Robbie Coltrane in this with no facial share and being rather short. I'm so used to seeing him as Hagrid in the Harry Potter movies. He was pretty charming in this movie. I kind of want a remake of this. A female writer/director would likely do a better job, at least make the third act stronger. I still ultimately like the movie. 7/10
 
  • Like
Reactions: CoolMe
The Secret Agent - Finally getting back to my Best Picture nominee catching up, I had to knock out the longest of the remaining films during the weekend. Sadly, I think I saw the best of that final lot, it's downhill from here! Wow, this movie was so rich. The visual presentation of the movie looked so detailed, a texture that I wanted to touch. I wanted to smell and even taste the movie. Certainly when seeing coxinhas, I wanted to have a taste. The worldbuilding here is way better than what you get from a Marvel or general franchise film. It's set in 1977 Brazil during a military dictatorship. The casting, which got nominated for an Oscar, also helped a lot with the worldbuiilding. People had such distinct faces here, right for the time period. The diversity is also amazing, with attention to detail with sound explanations for the presence of certain people with different accents. Udo Kier, for example, is German, and his presence here is so justified. RIP to him of course. The cast in this is so memorable, which is good because they help keep the story engaging whenever Wagner Moura isn't on the screen. Of course, they contribute well to scenes with Wagner Moura. He definitely deserves all the Best Actor nominations. Compared to his nominated peers, he's not flashy. But he's very authentic, I could feel what his character is going through. It's internalized, and when he does get emotional, it makes for some compelling cinema. Speaking of cinema, this film pretty much acts like a cinephile as certain movies from that time are referenced, one is even the subject of some plotpoints. Surprisingly, there's a lot of sex in the movie, and quite a few examples of absolutely wild imagery. There were some nice shocking moments in this. It's a very long movie, but it had to be. It took its time, and by doing so, I was able to be so immersed in the movie. I must admit that I wanted a bit more from the last leg of the movie, but the acting in that part was fantastic, so I'm not too bothered. I want this to win Best International Picture at the Oscars. So far, it's the best of that group that I've seen. It's even better than the highly nominated Hamnet. I think the movie deserved more nominations! Best Original Screenplay for sure, and even though it's a crowded field, I would have Kleber Mendonça Filho as a Best Director nominee. He did an amazing job with this film. It's so meticulously constructed that it may as well be a biopic! It's more authentic than a lot of biopics! 2025 was the year of dual performances, and amazingly, this film is another example of that! I kept hearing that Wagner Moura does a dual performance here. Thankfully it wasn't spoiled how that dual performance was pulled off. I certainly won't spoil it here. He's pretty much the dark horse to win Best Lead Actor. I won't predict him winning, but damn I would love it! I honestly want to rate this film a 9/10, but I think if I sit on the film more, the rating would be lower. So I'll just say it's an 8.5/10.

Train Dreams - This has been highly praised as a gentle, poetic, quiet, and lovely film. I agree with all that, but I don't like it as much as most people apparently. I understood the pacing, the time skipping, the use of narration. I understand all that, but it just didn't hit me hard enough. A rewatch might help. Something I immediately appreciated is the cinematography. Now that deserves all the praise. It's an absolutely gorgeous movie. I think it might be the absolute peak in digital cinematography. Adolpho Veloso did an incredible job, and between him and the people who worked on The Secret Agent, I'm currently high on the talents of Brazilians. Joel Edgerton's performance was great, he helped in keeping me invested. The rest of the cast is good, but they dip out of the movie too soon! William H. Macy, Felicity Jones, Kerry Condon. These are actors I admire a lot, but just as they're making an impact on the story, they're gone! So that was a bummer. I think rewatching the movie will help because I won't be disappointed on how the supporting cast is used. Clint Bentley's directing is effective, he definitely excelled in making a film that's heavy on vibes. It's a good movie, just not great. 7.5/10
 
  • Like
Reactions: CoolMe
The Man From Nowhere - A Pawn Shop Keeper keeping his past life of special forces in south korea quiet, rescues a neighbor who is a little girl from the mafia once her mother is killed by them. Great movie all around its also available in english sub or english dub. I watched both versions and this is one of those movies that are worth seeing. The cinematography and fight scenes are spectacular. Its a lot like Leon The Professional except by south koreans. I must have watched this movie a handfull of times and would recommend it to a lot of people on here who like action and good drama films. I give it a 8.2
 
  • Like
Reactions: RustInPeace
The Super Mario Bros Movie - This was my 2nd time watching the film and it holds up. So many easter eggs, lovely attention to detail, brilliant animation, very fast pacing, and at 89 minutes, it really doesn't overstay its welcome. I'm more sure of my enjoyment of the film after the 2nd viewing. I even liked Chris Pratt's performance as Mario a little better, even though Pratt in general is a crappy person. The voice cast overall was fantastic, with Charlie Day, Anya Taylor-Joy, and Seth Rogen as my favorites. The casting decisions for this were amazing, and how the OG Mario voice actor Charles Martinet was used proved to be very lovely, part fanservice, part torch passing. I'm excited over the 2nd movie keeping Mario and Luigi together, because I think some of the best parts of the movie involved the brothers. The story is very thin, but the Mario games have thin stories, so it was totally fine for me. Such a fun movie. Last Mario Day I watched the 1993 live action Super Mario Bros movie. I gave that movie a chance, my third overall even. The third time was not the charm, I just can't like that movie overall. It's much easier to like this Mario movie. 8/10
 
The Super Mario Bros Movie - This was my 2nd time watching the film and it holds up. So many easter eggs, lovely attention to detail, brilliant animation, very fast pacing, and at 89 minutes, it really doesn't overstay its welcome. I'm more sure of my enjoyment of the film after the 2nd viewing. I even liked Chris Pratt's performance as Mario a little better, even though Pratt in general is a crappy person. The voice cast overall was fantastic, with Charlie Day, Anya Taylor-Joy, and Seth Rogen as my favorites. The casting decisions for this were amazing, and how the OG Mario voice actor Charles Martinet was used proved to be very lovely, part fanservice, part torch passing. I'm excited over the 2nd movie keeping Mario and Luigi together, because I think some of the best parts of the movie involved the brothers. The story is very thin, but the Mario games have thin stories, so it was totally fine for me. Such a fun movie. Last Mario Day I watched the 1993 live action Super Mario Bros movie. I gave that movie a chance, my third overall even. The third time was not the charm, I just can't like that movie overall. It's much easier to like this Mario movie. 8/10
it was decent enough, they played it safe hopefully the sequels will improve further on what's been established here. also, i just wish the Legend of Zelda got the same treatment (instead of being live-action), im not against the idea but not too optimistic tbh and could easily flop, but either way it really depends on the execution. maybe someday will get something like this for us LoZ fans, eh?
 
  • Like
Reactions: RustInPeace
Frankenstein (2025) - Guillermo Del Toro has proven so many times that he loves his monsters. His adaptation of the Mary Shelley novel is the latest case, but it felt like he loved the Creature way too much. I read the novel in high school, and don't remember much of it. I haven't seen the Universal Frankenstein movies or any regarded as classics. Unless Young Frankenstein or Re-Animator counts. So I'm no expert on the Frankenstein story. With that said, it felt like Del Toro made it a point to make the Creature a simply tragic and sympathetic character. I know the Creature killed innocent people and was far from an angel. He does kill people, but out of self-defense or to punish wrongdoers. This take on Frankenstein removes some of the complexities of the character, and it doesn't help that pretty much everyone else was underdeveloped. Frankenstein himself, played by Oscar Isaac, kind of fell flat. It sucks because I like Oscar Isaac, but he never really elevated the character. Nobody really elevated their characters...except for Jacob Elordi. He is easily the best part of the movie and without him, this would've been a mediocre film. Some of the craft is incredible. The production and costume design, the makeup and hairstyling. Those elements are very strong, with the makeup work on him being worthy of winning an Oscar. I will say that at some points, I can clearly see Jacob Elordi, namely his eyes. But that's not a complaint, I believe he was still very transformative and brought so much life to The Creature. I now can't believe Andrew Garfield was originally going to play The Creature, I don't know if that would've worked.

Not all the craft in the movie is strong. The VFX is one of the weakest components of the movie. While the production design is amazing, sometimes it's still obvious that they shot this on a green screen. The cinematography is very good, but following up Train Dreams, this is nowhere near that film's level. Both films were shot on digital video. I was concerned that the movie's 2 1/2 hour runtime would be very tough, but I surprisingly managed decently. I would still cut up to maybe 20 minutes of the movie. The film starts off kind of rough, and there are some pacing issues generally. But when The Creature takes over, the movie starts to come alive. Another Oscar this movie didn't deserve is Best Adapted Screenplay. Some of the dialogue is too on the nose. Del Toro's a much better director than writer, and that shows here. This is a finely directed movie. As far as the other cast members, they're okay, but not great. Mia Goth in a Guillermo Del Toro film sounds like a slam dunk, but she didn't leave much of an impact. Christoph Waltz was decent, but I think his role could've been cut out and the story wouldn't be changed drastically. Victor's brother was damn near useless, and that's no shade on the actor. Anyway, this was a good movie, I certainly don't love it as much as many people. It's also baffling how this got Best Picture and Adapted Screenplay when No Other Choice got nothing! 7.5/10

Cats
- I watched it right after Frankenstein, which makes for a very random double feature. I had time to spare and I wanted to watch it since a podcast I love is going to roast it. It's total shit, I wish The Creature killed all the ugly-ass, weirdly sexualized cats like he did the wolves. Tom Hooper should return the Oscar he won for directing The King's Speech. That win was a fluke, Cats proved that he's a hack. 0/10
 
Last edited by RustInPeace,
Killer of Sheep - I don't think I watched this film in the best condition. This 1978 film is in black-and-white and is set in Watts, California. It's only 80 minutes long and was filmed on a budget of $10000 with no permits and the use of a lot of copyright music. In a way, the movie is about nothing. It's about Black people living in Watts, and their lives are very mundane. It's like a slice-of-life, but it doesn't have typical emotional high points. It's meandering, slow, but it feels like real life. The black-and-white look is appealing, and certain scenes shocked me. But it was a little tough to get through at points. I was getting tired and frankly bored. I watched this at night and ate dinner so quickly. Maybe that messed me up. It would've helped if I knew about the movie more. I just knew it's on Criterion and was rated so highly. It's still decent. I can see that there's symbolism. The music is great, and some of the acting is solid. Amateur actors, but still solid. I am interested in other films from director Charles Burnett. I can see Killer of Sheep being taught in film classes. It's a nice demonstration of how to make a movie about nothing on the surface. It's a movie that might be whatever you want it to be. A movie that shows the American Dream fully dead? A movie that shows the horror of complacency, stagnation, and being stuck in the hood? Whatever it is, I can respect it. 7/10
I think we essentially had the same reaction to Killer of Sheep. I think the hype surrounding the film I kept hearing over the years about it (and how it is pretty highly placed on, say, the Sight and Sound 250) kind of made me think it was going to be more than it was. There are some movies are just elevated by it being ameutur/non- actors, and it’s definitely one of them (another one that comes to mind immediately is Pasolini’s Gospel According to Matthew), but I too felt bored at times. I’ve been meaning to revisit, I think I’ll like it better the second time around. Sort of how I really liked Jeanne Dielman the second time.

As far as other Burnett, check out To Sleep With Anger. Really good movie.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RustInPeace

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum