Using the wrong pen is not a big deal and doesn't demonstrate any wrong-doing, it's a minor procedural mistake. There's a difference between doing something maliciously and doing something absentmindedly.
really... Not in American, because until recently "Government documents, like a passport application, will also require the use of black ink. In some countries, they are so strict on these policies that they will completely reject any government correspondence that are submitted in the wrong color"
For the specific reason that I've already mentioned. Mistakes like this happen all the time in all avenues of life and can be easily corrected, if there are any accusations of wrong-doing, they'll have to be evidenced. I'm afraid that using the wrong pen isn't a criminal offense.
Heck the US Army still very Strict with how you fill out and correct items
The Military recommends using blue or black pens, with a strong preference towards black. The document you posted is guidance in regards to filling out correspondence, it's consistent with that recommendation. With that being said, you will not get "court martialed" for using an incorrect pen colour - you'll get disciplined. I am unable to find a single reference to this being a court martial offense, or one case where a military officer was sentenced for using the wrong pen. I have found multiple references to soldiers being yelled at, which is not a big deal.
Is there any evidence that this individual entered the building at any point? They're entitled to go to a political rally, that's not illegal.
COME ON people! the Red Pen was a joke hence it was after the statement and link and even with ended with a "LOL"
This is the second time the room is quiet after one of your bangers, I don't think you can blame us. I can guarantee that we're not a tough crowd.
Here is former AZ lawmaker Anthony Kern (counting ballots)
He's standing outside. Behind the barriers, perhaps, but hardly in the process of "overthrowing the government".
If the feds have any issues with that, they can contact him - they've been fairly lenient so far.
sorry but that is the Steps of the Capitol. Which would be Trespassing ..He's standing outside. Behind the barriers, perhaps, but hardly in the process of "overthrowing the government".
Here is former AZ lawmaker Anthony Kern (counting ballots)
and here is he is Trespassing and committing crimes 120ish days ago
and conflict of interest.. Here is
Rep. Andy Biggs taking a Secret "Tour"
I understand, We can see you have Trouble understanding Reality ..
That's cool, my man. I find it unobjectionable, but if you want to impune him for trespass on a set of stairs, that's fine. He is there, you're not wrong, I just fail to see how it's a problem. It's not the first time protesters stood on the steps of the US Capitol. I'm old enough to remember when protestors were banging on the doors to stop Kavanaugh's nomination. That's a lot of people standing on a lot of steps. Different building, same complex, same rule.
If we have to discuss what a conflict of interest is again I'm going to have an aneurysm, so I'm not going there.
fair enough but the optics don't look good by having him there, They had Hundreds of volunteers, They should not of used him or at the very least removed him when it was found out.
