https://gbatemp.net/forums/world-news-current-events-politics.290/
Keep your political bait post to the containment section.
Gaming Switch Online is horrible
- Thread starter TheSpearGuy
- Start date
- Views 4,720
- Replies 31
- Likes 4
Keep your political bait post to the containment section.
so if I stole your wallet and it only had 25 dollars then you would be fine with that?
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2009
- Messages
- 2,098
- Trophies
- 1
- Age
- 42
- Location
- Montreal, Qc
- Website
- www.tetesrasees.com
- XP
- 1,849
- Country
I took the free Switch online trials but never paid for the service. The lag is too intense for my standards.
Never played Smash or Splatoon online.
Diablo III was fine though. Tetris is as well (lol).
It's 20 bucks here for a year in Germany so honestly: It's a no brainer, no matter how bad it is. Had to pay 5 $ (or more) for a Virtual Console game on previous Nintendo consoles. Having those NES and SNES games alone is worth it.
Not for me actually (using RetroArch in emuNAND) but for those who don't use a CFW I'd say it's worth it.
The netcode might still suck though. Maybe that's why I don't even want to bother with Smash online.
Diablo III was fine though. Tetris is as well (lol).
It's 20 bucks here for a year in Germany so honestly: It's a no brainer, no matter how bad it is. Had to pay 5 $ (or more) for a Virtual Console game on previous Nintendo consoles. Having those NES and SNES games alone is worth it.
Not for me actually (using RetroArch in emuNAND) but for those who don't use a CFW I'd say it's worth it.
The netcode might still suck though. Maybe that's why I don't even want to bother with Smash online.
The Switch Online is bad. The lag is worse than the Wii U. You can't blame Nintendo for the connection as it is exclusively P2P and the only factors are people's connection on one end or another.
Nintendo shouldn't make you pay for a P2P service which doesn't cost them anything to maintain...
Nintendo shouldn't make you pay for a P2P service which doesn't cost them anything to maintain...
10000% agree with yall, I think its too late from them to go back now....all they could do is improve it.
*WE ALL KNOW HOW LONG THAT WOULD TAKE *
*WE ALL KNOW HOW LONG THAT WOULD TAKE *
Similar threads
- No one is chatting at the moment.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
@
Jayro:
Eventhough the New 3DS XL is more powerful, I still feel like the DS Lite was a more polished system. It's a real shame that it never got an XL variant keeping the GBA slot. You'd have to go on AliExpress and buy an ML shell to give a DS phat the unofficial "DS Lite" treatment, and that's the best we'll ever get I'm afraid.+1 -
-
@
SylverReZ:
@Jayro, I don't see whats so special about the DS ML, its just a DS lite in a phat shell. At least the phat model had louder speakers, whereas the lite has a much better screen.+1 -
@
SylverReZ:
They probably said "Hey, why not we combine the two together and make a 'new' DS to sell".
-
-
-
@
Veho:
Nothing special about it other than it's more comfortable than the Lite+1
for people with beefy hands. -
-
-
-
