D
Deleted User
Guest
OP
Hey im on 8.0.0 and i want to ask if AutoRCM now bricks on this Firmware because i thought that TX said that
my hackable switch will dont brick?AutoRCM is independent of FW.
AutoRCM will brick your console only if you have a patched unit.
Is it a patched unit? I don't think so. So no, it won't brick.my hackable switch will dont brick?
You shouldn't automatically believe anything TX says. AutoRCM works on all system versions, including 8.0.x. While there's no public way to do it yet, AutoRCM will cause an unrecoverable brick if used on an RCM-patched unit.Hey im on 8.0.0 and i want to ask if AutoRCM now bricks on this Firmware because i thought that TX said that
I guess there is. If you boot CFW on 1.0.0 and use rei (or other) configurator apps, I think that you can install autorcm from them. But then again, it's 1.0.0 so idk how well is it supported.You shouldn't automatically believe anything TX says. AutoRCM works on all system versions, including 8.0.x. While there's no public way to do it yet, AutoRCM will cause an unrecoverable brick if used on an RCM-patched unit.
then why should i trust you. im trusting TX and know that their leaks are often real (8.0 leak)You shouldn't automatically believe anything TX says. AutoRCM works on all system versions, including 8.0.x. While there's no public way to do it yet, AutoRCM will cause an unrecoverable brick if used on an RCM-patched unit.
i said hackable ^^ but i tried it now and it dont brick thank you!Is it a patched unit? I don't think so. So no, it won't brick.
Patched units are hackable as well.then why should i trust you. im trusting TX and know that their leaks are often real (8.0 leak)
--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------
i said hackable ^^ but i tried it now and it dont brick thank you!
yea but who is using nvhax i never saw someone on this forum or am i wrong?Patched units are hackable as well.
TX was wrong about 8.0.0 and AutoRCM.then why should i trust you. im trusting TX and know that their leaks are often real (8.0 leak)
--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------
i said hackable ^^ but i tried it now and it dont brick thank you!
TX didnt said that at all i was wrong but fast type the next shit inTX was wrong about 8.0.0 and AutoRCM.
Then I don't know what you're referring to.TX didnt said that at all i was wrong but fast type the next shit in
Then I don't know what you're referring to.
i THOUGHT that TX said that
TX was right with 8.0.0Follow along. You said TX was right about 8.0.0, and now you're saying you're referring to the claim that 8.0.0 is incompatible with AutoRCM. I explained that 8.0.0 is actually compatible with AutoRCM.
If your talking about the claim that 8.0.0 is incompatible with AutoRCM, that was wrong. So, unless you're talking about something else, TX was not right about anything.TX was right with 8.0.0
I THOUGHT that THEY (actually someone else) said that
so you're wrong because your brain is formatting everything when a new reply appears
i guess you dont understand that TX has nothing to do with this thread and i guess a switched the fact that AutoRCM bricks Patched Units with their post because some idiots thought that and i copied this reply to my brain and so i thought itIf your talking about the claim that 8.0.0 is incompatible with AutoRCM, that was wrong. So, unless you're talking about something else, TX was not right about anything.
You shouldn't automatically believe anything TX says. AutoRCM works on all system versions, including 8.0.x. While there's no public way to do it yet, AutoRCM will cause an unrecoverable brick if used on an RCM-patched unit.
You said that "TX was right" about a claim that was actually wrong. I'm not making any other claims about who said what. Unless you were talking about them being right about something else, you are mistaken.i guess you dont understand that TX has nothing to do with this thread and i guess a switched the fact that AutoRCM bricks Patched Units with their post because some idiots thought that and i copied this reply to my brain and so i thought it
and btw read the posts i had with @Kubas_inko
then you see that im already using AutoRCM now and im not bricked so stop sending replys u r wrong and your brain got formatted once again
i meant they was right with that what they said and they didnt said thatYou said that "TX was right" about a claim that was actually wrong. I'm not making any other claims about who said what. Unless you were talking about them being right about something else, you are mistaken.