Opinions re: ANTIFA?

[PanTheFaun]

I was mostly talking about the topic of this thread. They usually make a distinction far left and far right when associating different groups like Nazis, Blm and Antifa.

All I'm saying is that Antifa has done a lot of horrible things and that they just so happen to identify as the left.

 

[WD_GASTER2]

you are absolutely allowed to defend your position. However that is different from getting defensive.
when you said "thats your opinion" you seemed to be stating the obvious (the name of this thread)

as for my issue is that 2 groups do not compare to the other. There could be essays written as to why, but to keep my story short and sweet and to an ultimately strong and valid point:

This country went to literal war with one ideology. where thousands of people lost their lives to make sure such ideology did not continue doing more damage. Also only one of them literally attempted Genocide.

Also i do not think all elements of BLM or ANTIFA are saints but to compare them to a group that took pride in trying to commit genocide. seems odd to me.

 

[PanTheFaun]

you are absolutely allowed to defend your position. However that is different from getting defensive.
when you said "thats your opinion" you seemed to be stating the obvious (the name of this thread)

as for my issue is that 2 groups do not compare to the other. There could be essays written as to why, but to keep my story short and sweet and to an ultimately strong and valid point:

This country went to literal war with one ideology. where thousands of people lost their lives to make sure such ideology did not continue doing more damage. Also only one of them literally attempted Genocide.

Also i do not think all elements of BLM or ANTIFA are saints but to compare them to a group that took pride in trying to commit genocide. seems odd to me.

Haha whether you give it the name genocide or not more people were murdered during WW2 with communism. The Jewish Bolsheviks murdered millions of white Christians for just that reason alone. I also don't believe that there were gas chambers either but that's just from evidence I have found. Just my opinion. c:

 

[WD_GASTER2]

Ah, i see. you do not believe the holocaust happened. I do not believe anything i could ever say to someone over the internet could change their heart or opinion on something such as that.
I bid you a good day.

 

[PanTheFaun]

Ah, i see. you do not believe the holocaust happened. I do not believe anything i could ever say to someone over the internet could change their heart or opinion on something such as that.
I bid you a good day.

Alrighty then. c:

 

[SG854]

you are absolutely allowed to defend your position. However that is different from getting defensive.
when you said "thats your opinion" you seemed to be stating the obvious (the name of this thread)

as for my issue is that 2 groups do not compare to the other. There could be essays written as to why, but to keep my story short and sweet and to an ultimately strong and valid point:

This country went to literal war with one ideology. where thousands of people lost their lives to make sure such ideology did not continue doing more damage. Also only one of them literally attempted Genocide.

Also i do not think all elements of BLM or ANTIFA are saints but to compare them to a group that took pride in trying to commit genocide. seems odd to me.

People get too caught up on comparisons. Blm and Antifa are bad for many reasons on their own. From lying about cop killings, to riots without evidence. And it has produced negative effects.

 

[PanTheFaun]

People get too caught up on comparisons. Blm and Antifa are bad for many reasons on their own. From lying about cop killings, to riots without evidence. And it has produced negative effects.

There is nothing wrong with comparing.

 

[SG854]

There is nothing wrong with comparing.

I guess so. It provides context.

 

[PanTheFaun]

I guess so. It provides context.

Exactly. c:

 

[the_randomizer]

This whole thing about trying to see which side is more violent to prove not to vote for the other side is ridiculous. This is why I don’t choose any political sides. I don’t call myself a Democrat or a Republican. I focus more on policies and debating those policies. That way I avoid party association and assumptions.

Like for example I support Trumps tax cuts since it brings more tax revenue. But I don’t support his tarrifs. I’m sometimes for Trump and against him.

It’s obvious mainstream media, Hollywood and Universities are more left leaning. Having this power and support is hugely influential. The fact that you don’t get to hear equal representation of Republican values, and have to look for their opinions on your own. From hearing many Republican values they seem very sensible and based on facts. And many are not racist at all.


Everyday feminism is a funny site. I sometimes go there to see what wacky thing they have going on there. I remember they were offering a paid training class service where they heal you from “Toxic Whitness.” And yes they called it that.

I sometimes go to feminists sites because they make me laugh.

Isn't it also the left-wing/progressive nutjob minority groups the ones that get so easily asshurt that we have to censor every damn thing the majority of people say? Let's all just agree that either side of the political extreme is something that should be shunned.

 

[Captain_N]

If i ever get stuck in my car surrounded by them jack ass protesters and they start rocking my car and/or hitting it, im pressing the gas and driving over them. I have the right to protect myself.

 

[Xzi]

Do you see the entirety of the blacks, Asians, Arabs, Jews, etc. told that they should have guilt? That their DNA is an abomination? That if they love their race or try to defend it that they are a supremacist? Nope. Only white people.

This is simply delusional on so many levels. I've never been told to feel guilt over my whiteness by anybody, so clearly that's a narrative being fed to you by certain media.

Now, try to play the reverse game with these articles and imagine what would have happened have the roles been switched. I can assure you that many of these "journalists" wouldn't have a job anymore and there would be worldwide rage.

The roles are switched in far-right wing media. Those "journalists" continue to have a job specifically for that reason, and the world already hates us for our authoritarian tendencies. Many of your examples can be classified as extremism, and that I do denounce in any form. However, to paint fringe elements and some opinion pieces/magazine articles as a majority of the left's mindset is silly. It'd be like painting the majority of the right as neo-nazi Q-believing nutjobs, which you'd obviously be against.

 

[PanTheFaun]

This is simply delusional on so many levels. I've never been told to feel guilt over my whiteness by anybody, so clearly that's a narrative being fed to you by certain media.


The roles are switched in far-right wing media. Those "journalists" continue to have a job specifically for that reason, and the world already hates us for our authoritarian tendencies. Many of your examples can be classified as extremism, and that I do denounce in any form. However, to paint fringe elements and some opinion pieces/magazine articles as a majority of the left's mindset is silly. It'd be like painting the majority of the right as neo-nazi Q-believing nutjobs, which you'd obviously be against.

Yeah... that's what I said. The media displays news to millions of people and of course most people are going to believe what they are being told. I have also gotten into disputes with people before where they told me I should feel shameful that my people did certain acts in the past. No guilt for me. c:

 

[Song of storms]

This is simply delusional on so many levels. I've never been told to feel guilt over my whiteness by anybody, so clearly that's a narrative being fed to you by certain media.


The roles are switched in far-right wing media. Those "journalists" continue to have a job specifically for that reason, and the world already hates us for our authoritarian tendencies. Many of your examples can be classified as extremism, and that I do denounce in any form. However, to paint fringe elements and some opinion pieces/magazine articles as a majority of the left's mindset is silly. It'd be like painting the majority of the right as neo-nazi Q-believing nutjobs, which you'd obviously be against.

Except that the examples I posted were episodes that all went unpunished. That south African politician is still in charge of his position, hoards of nazisheeps are still attacking anyone over something as petty as fucking clothes trying to move attention away from their outstanding work and so on. These things happen and go vastly unpunished, but the left never says anything about it. That south african asshole should have been thrown in jail for inciting a genocide while in a position of power but instead an act this awful goes unnoticed. But the left media flourish on the shit carpet that's reports about what Trump ate for dinner.

Again, this is why a lot of people would rather go with the part of the government that they would never vote, but they have to choose between someone who makes a fool of himself on Twitter and someone who doesn't mind if whites get the rope. And the more people downplay or ridiculise these issues, the more commonmen will switch to the far right.

 

[Xzi]

These things happen and go vastly unpunished, but the left never says anything about it.

Most of the outlets you posted were traditionally left-leaning, so we wouldn't know about those stories without the left saying something about it.

Again, this is why a lot of people would rather go with the part of the government that they would never vote, but they have to choose between someone who makes a fool of himself on Twitter and someone who doesn't mind if whites get the rope. And the more people downplay or ridiculise these issues, the more commonmen will switch to the far right.

Hillary Clinton is white. There was never any threat of whites "getting the rope" from either candidate, again this is a victim delusion. Which is precisely what drives people away from the far right, hypocrisy in how they treat actual victims of crimes versus playing the victim card whenever it's convenient to cover for some controversial social views.

 

[SG854]

Isn't it also the left-wing/progressive nutjob minority groups the ones that get so easily asshurt that we have to censor every damn thing the majority of people say? Let's all just agree that either side of the political extreme is something that should be shunned.

Ya, that’s a problem especially in college campuses.

 

[PanTheFaun]

Most of the outlets you posted were traditionally left-leaning, so we wouldn't know about those stories without the left saying something about it.


Hillary Clinton is white. There was never any threat of whites "getting the rope" from either candidate, again this is a victim delusion. Which is precisely what drives people away from the far right, hypocrisy in how they treat actual victims of crimes versus playing the victim card whenever it's convenient to cover for some controversial social views.

They only went for Hillary Clinton because she was appealing to the things they wanted and that she was the only candidate at the time representing them. You're not always right so stop acting like you have the answers for everything. It's annoying.

 

[Song of storms]

Most of the outlets you posted were traditionally left-leaning, so we wouldn't know about those stories without the left saying something about it.


Hillary Clinton is white. There was never any threat of whites "getting the rope" from either candidate, again this is a victim delusion. Which is precisely what drives people away from the far right, hypocrisy in how they treat actual victims of crimes versus playing the victim card whenever it's convenient to cover for some controversial social views.

You mean the same person that said that "women have always been the primary victims of war"?

Or someone like this democrat that used a racial slur as an attempt to hurt another candidate?
https://eu.freep.com/story/news/loc...ettie-cook-scott-stephanie-change/1010651002/

Make no mistake that, had the left no opposition, we would have a situation the same as South Africa. This happens when you let one side take everything, with part of it doing its best to oppress the other as an attempt to fight a bogey man. The fact that you're talking about "victim mentality" makes me think that you haven't read any of the links I posted earlier.

 

[Xzi]

They only went for Hillary Clinton because she was appealing to the things they wanted and that she was the only candidate at the time representing them. You're not always right so stop acting like you have the answers for everything. It's annoying.

What? I didn't say anything about which votes went for Clinton. Yeah, she won the popular vote, but she definitely didn't win a majority of whites.

Make no mistake that, had the left no opposition, we would have a situation the same as South Africa.

I can only use the term 'delusional' so many times, jesus man. Whites are still a vast majority of representation in both parties. Being a Democratic Republic is what is supposed to keep us from a South Africa situation, but AFAIK even they don't have children in interment camps so at the moment the US has little moral authority to reprimand any other country for human rights abuses.

 

[PanTheFaun]

What? I didn't say anything about which votes went for Clinton. Yeah, she won the popular vote, but she definitely didn't win a majority of whites.

My point is that a white woman like Hillary tells people that white people are wrong if they support their race and throws us under the bus to get the votes. She tells the liberals what they want to hear at the expense of whites. No other people get backlash like us so openly in the media, newspapers, etc.