Hacking Atmosphère with sig patches from ReiNX. (Backup loading)

[fixingmytoys]

tells me i am missing hekate_ip1.ini , should not be this hard grrrrr lol

 

[BaamAlex]

You must modify the hekate_ipl.ini. And this line here "kip1patch=nosigchk" under this section "

[LayeredFS]
kip1=modules/newfirm/loader.kip
kip1=modules/newfirm/sm.kip
kip1=modules/newfirm/fs_mitm.kip
atmosphere=1
kip1patch=nosigchk"

Without the ". It must looks like on this pic.

 

[Migz]

Update your f...ing Firmware to the latest.

EZ Fella!!!!

 

[Reisyukaku]

>reinx doesn't support hekate
What did he mean by this

 

[subcon959]

Without explanation it looks petty act of an "Anti-Piracy Warriors", just doing what ever little you can to slightly annoy pirates.

Let them enjoy their little petty victories. They lost the war a long time ago.

 

[Lacius]

Does this work on 3.00 firmware then?

My understanding is everything is compatible with 3.0.0 except DevMenu.

 

[Migz]

My understanding is everything is compatible with 3.0.0 except DevMenu.

Hi Lacius just sent you pm ok Fella?

 

[comput3rus3r]

How about locking the thread for being pointless now that the zip file mentioned in OP is not allowed to be linked? Pretty much makes the entire thread useless.

speak for yourself. I found it very useful.

 

[Lunalik]

When did the sig patches for reinx get removed?

Last night

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

anyone what payload do i use please

hekate

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

Does this work on 3.00 firmware then?

no

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

which payload should i use for this?
plus does layerdFS work with this build or not?
btw am on 5.x

yes this has layered support. just use hekate

 

[mariogamer]

For anyone wondering about if Atmosphere get those officially, fincs explained it pretty well: https://github.com/Atmosphere-NX/Atmosphere/issues/167#issuecomment-407710877

 

[BaamAlex]

Which payload do i need? The modified from this thread? https://gbatemp.net/threads/ctcaer-hekate-that-can-automatically-patch-fs-kip1.512323/

Or this here? https://github.com/CTCaer/hekate/releases/tag/v3.2

 

[Draxzelex]

Which payload do i need? The modified from this thread? https://gbatemp.net/threads/ctcaer-hekate-that-can-automatically-patch-fs-kip1.512323/

Or this here? https://github.com/CTCaer/hekate/releases/tag/v3.2

The former, the latter does not properly support the signature patching yet.

 

[Lunalik]

Which payload do i need? The modified from this thread? https://gbatemp.net/threads/ctcaer-hekate-that-can-automatically-patch-fs-kip1.512323/

Or this here? https://github.com/CTCaer/hekate/releases/tag/v3.2

use normal hekate ctcaer's

 

[BaamAlex]

And this here is my hekate_ipl.ini

Is it okay with the marked line or not?

 

[rajkosto]

if you have that line you must use my hekate fork, otherwise you can use original ctcaer.

 

[Lunalik]

And this here is my hekate_ipl.ini

Is it okay with the marked line or not?

To use ctcaer's hekate, you would have to remove the line (just as rajkosto said). You could go either way.

 

[rajkosto]

there's no "compatibility issues" with my fork, it simply adds a feature, if you dont use the feature, nothing happens and it works like the original

 

[Lunalik]

there's no "compatibility issues" with my fork, it simply adds a feature, if you dont use the feature, nothing happens and it works like the original

Changed it.

 

[BaamAlex]

Better? I will give it a second try

 

[Lunalik]

Better? I will give it a second try

Should work now (as long as you use ctcaer's hekate).