Hacking RELEASE SX OS 1.3 unpacker

[comput3rus3r]

From my understanding SX OS's custom payload launching is more limited. For example, you can't load custom kips using it. Would this allow you to do so?

so that would mean that hexkyz is now writing homebrew specifically to give sx-os more functionality.

 

[TurtlePowerrr]

From my understanding SX OS's custom payload launching is more limited. For example, you can't load custom kips using it. Would this allow you to do so?

You can load ANY custom payload for free right now bro come on

 

[DemonSurfer]

Those guys have nothing better to work on? Atmosphere could have been done by now...

Apparently they used the Atmosphere code and some other open source stuff in the SX OS and then charged us money for someone else's work

 

[ChaosEternal]

You can load ANY custom payload for free right now bro come on

I'm just repeating what Rajkosto said in his downgrading thread. According to him, SX OS is currently unable to load custom kip1s.

 

[Priyam]

Apparently they used the Atmosphere code and some other open source stuff in the SX OS and then charged us money for someone else's work

I think people should not speak without knowing the real facts. They are not charging for the homebrew part which is stolen atmosphere code. They are only charging for the backup loader and signature patching which is no way related to atmosphere.

 

[TurtlePowerrr]

Apparently they used the Atmosphere code and some other open source stuff in the SX OS and then charged us money for someone else's work

Well maybe the creators of Atmosphere shouldn't have posted their work in an OPEN SOURCE project. I mean they obviously don't care about the money or else why would they have posted their stuff?

 

[DemonSurfer]

I think people should not speak without knowing the real facts. They are not charging for the homebrew part which is stolen atmosphere code. They are not charging for the backup loader and signature patching which is no way related to atmosphere.

Just saying....i personally don't think it's right,i did some reading up on it,not saying i know a whole lot.

 

[Draxzelex]

Well maybe the creators of Atmosphere shouldn't have posted their work in an OPEN SOURCE project. I mean they obviously don't care about the money or else why would they have posted their stuff?

That's why they licensed their open-source project

 

[smf]

nx-hbloader: 383
atm-loader: 5.714
atm-fs-mitm: 2.456
hkt-bdf: 26

Those are the lines they may have copied, did they copy every one of them?

"sx os" boot menu: 300
xci to s:fs: 500
DRM: 200

You just made those numbers up. I suspect you're biased.

 

[Kioku]

I think people should not speak without knowing the real facts. They are not charging for the homebrew part which is stolen atmosphere code. They are only charging for the backup loader and signature patching which is no way related to atmosphere.

Even with that logic, people still act like it's the end of world. Another situation overblown by ignorant internet patrons. Yeah, we get it, they used someone else's open source code (GPL violations and all) but that's not entirely what they're selling.

 

[adrifcastr]

Those are the lines they may have copied, did they copy every one of them?



You just made those numbers up. I suspect you're biased.

I suspect you have no experience in reverse engineering compiled binaries. Thanks to nährwert and hexkyz this was a lot easier.

 

[smf]

I suspect you have no experience in reverse engineering compiled binaries.

You obviously aren't very good at guessing.

 

[Priyam]

Even with that logic, people still act like it's the end of world. Another situation overblown by ignorant internet patrons. Yeah, we get it, they used someone else's open source code (GPL violations and all) but that's not entirely what they're selling.

Exactly, I know it's unethical. But does it matter? People are buying this for piracy and those same guys are saying things like I will wait for a free version. Free version for what? doing the same unethical things that TX is accused of. Hypocrites, I tell you.
Even after ignoring the fact that TX is selling only the backup loader, which is their own code

 

[smf]

People are buying this for piracy and those same guys are saying things like I will wait for a free version. Free version for what? doing the same unethical things that TX is accused of. Hypocrites, I tell you.
Even after ignoring the fact that TX is selling only the backup loader, which is their own code

Maybe these "Hypocrites" are assuming that because TX linked their code to GPL code, that SX OS is GPL licensed and so copying it is fine.

That may not hold water legally, but I doubt many people here are lawyers.

 

[DaveLister]

Its like saying , this is a stick up , I will rob you , but only a little bit and not entirely. The argument is a dead one to me at least.

 

[kamesenin888]

Maybe these "Hypocrites" are assuming that because TX linked their code to GPL code, that SX OS is GPL licensed and so copying it is fine.

That may not hold water legally, but I doubt many people here are lawyers.

AFAIK for code in programming to be able to stand in court, has to be copied for its entirely, with . ; to be the same, they have even told that the lines in tx os are far less than with hb loader and atmosphere, so there is nothing that you can do

 

[Raugo]

Exactly, I know it's unethical. But does it matter? People are buying this for piracy and those same guys are saying things like I will wait for a free version. Free version for what? doing the same unethical things that TX is accused of. Hypocrites, I tell you.
Even after ignoring the fact that TX is selling only the backup loader, which is their own code

Layered fs only can be used with the payed version and even if it was free, It would still not comply with the GPL of atmosphere

https://github.com/Atmosphere-NX/Atmosphere/blob/master/LICENSE

Basically the project when you use the code need to be opensource and have the same license. What type of license have SX OS? What are the limitations that you say that they are not fulfilling it?

 

[kamesenin888]

Nobody cares man,

Layered fs only can be used with the payed version and even if it was free, It would still not comply with the GPL of atmosphere

https://github.com/Atmosphere-NX/Atmosphere/blob/master/LICENSE

Basically the project when you use the code need to be opensource and have the same license. What type of license have SX OS? What are the limitations that you say that they are not fulfilling it?

nobody cares man

 

[adrifcastr]

Nobody cares man,

nobody cares man

Same sing the midwife said

 

[Draxzelex]

I don't cares man

I fixed it for you