Hacking SX OS v1.2

Status
Not open for further replies.

lordelan

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2015
Messages
5,799
Trophies
1
Age
44
XP
6,563
Country
Germany
I was wondering that. So can you tell me something... what would this feature be used for then??
It's not useful at all. But if you're on 1.0.0 you could use the guide to go to 4.x (or above) without burning fuses and once a coldboot exploit comes out, just go back to your original FW (because no fuses have been burnt) and apply it.

only a matter of time until we can meat beat to the happiness of having a USB Loader
I don't see this anytime soon but it's one of the things I'd be happy about the most.
Dealing with only sd cards sucks.
 

Mr. Wizard

Ending the spread of bullshit one thread at a time
Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2015
Messages
1,814
Trophies
0
Location
E8 lattice
XP
1,532
Country
Canada
It's not useful at all. But if you're on 1.0.0 you could use the guide to go to 4.x (or above) without burning fuses and once a coldboot exploit comes out, just go back to your original FW (because no fuses have been burnt) and apply it.


I don't see this anytime soon but it's one of the things I'd be happy about the most.
Dealing with only sd cards sucks.

I am on 3.0.0 and am going to 5.1.0 so I can play newer games, having only 3 fuses blown I will then be able to go back to 3.0.0 when Atmosphere comes out (if that's even required) so I can install coldboot which for the time being is said to only work on 1.0 - 3.0.0 firmwares.
 

ICEM4N

Member
Newcomer
Joined
Feb 29, 2008
Messages
13
Trophies
0
Website
www.theninjabunny.com
XP
342
Country
Austria
There's no such thing as an "more ban resistant (emunand)".
If you have emunand, the information about the console and certs are still shared between sysnand and emunand.
You get banned in one, the other does as well.

I don't get why people are claimoring emunand as if it is some sort of hacking messiah, that shit's overrated and it's more cumbersome than a relief to be honest. I would much rather have it all in a sigpatched sysnand.

And no, using online in a clean sysnand while only using emunand for backups and homebrew WON'T save you from a ban.

I thought you could use offline the CFW with emunand, and go online with ofw/sysnand (the error log / telemetry should be "clean", shouldn't it?)

What is/does a sigpatched sysnand?
 

Mr. Wizard

Ending the spread of bullshit one thread at a time
Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2015
Messages
1,814
Trophies
0
Location
E8 lattice
XP
1,532
Country
Canada
I thought you could use offline the CFW with emunand, and go online with ofw/sysnand (the error log / telemetry should be "clean", shouldn't it?)

What is/does a sigpatched sysnand?
This is how my 3DS survived, OFW for online purchasing and shit, emuNAND for everything else. emuNAND was highly customized, if Reggie ever saw that he'd jizz in his pants and insta-ban me.


And Pegaswitch is the homebrew launcher right?
https://gbatemp.net/threads/sx-os-v1-2.508788/page-4#post-8088426
 
Last edited by Mr. Wizard,

GunzOfNavarone

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2016
Messages
368
Trophies
0
Age
44
XP
1,204
Country
It's not useful at all. But if you're on 1.0.0 you could use the guide to go to 4.x (or above) without burning fuses and once a coldboot exploit comes out, just go back to your original FW (because no fuses have been burnt) and apply it.

Thanks for that. I am currently awaiting my SX Pro kit to arrive. I have a Switch on 3.0.2 which I think (if I'm right) is too high for coldboot anyway. In your personal opinion, is there any reason for me to stay on 3.0.2 ? I'm wanting to use exfat and so half of me is thinking fuck it, just update to the latest firmware as SX OS is supported anyway. Then half of me is getting scare-mongered into thinking what if I update and then regret it.
 

Fred Molyneux

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2014
Messages
109
Trophies
0
Age
44
XP
952
Country
Canada
I hope they add support for updating games soon.

I have a feeling that update thing and bans is bullshit written by users who use layeredfs and blame it on SX OS.

I have updated all my games (backups :), and still am, since day 1, I never had any issue.
but i have not registered an account with eshop or online play yet.

I emailed Team Xecuter about it and they told me they are investigating further before making a statement, but that they also never had an issue and also suspect incomplete testimony about what users have done.

If anything happen, I will let you know, but I doubt it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lordelan

Mr. Wizard

Ending the spread of bullshit one thread at a time
Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2015
Messages
1,814
Trophies
0
Location
E8 lattice
XP
1,532
Country
Canada

ShadowOne333

QVID PRO QVO
Editorial Team
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Messages
12,212
Trophies
2
XP
34,074
Country
Mexico
I have read a lot of ban reports, but I haven’t seen any use of emunand as of yet. Could you please provide a link of someone who used emunand and got banned?
Would you mind linking those reports?
I don't have them at hand, but they're on one of those "Ban" threads.
It's either the Ban wave one or the Ban thread with everyone reporting what they did and so on.

It's not emunand per-se, but basically what some of the users that got banned did is that they used the OFW for playing online only, while using SX OS for backups offline and nothing else. The reports are not as massive as the ones for LayeredFS uses, but there are quite a few there.
 

lordelan

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2015
Messages
5,799
Trophies
1
Age
44
XP
6,563
Country
Germany
I am on 3.0.0 and am going to 5.1.0 so I can play newer games, having only 3 fuses blown I will then be able to go back to 3.0.0 when Atmosphere comes out (if that's even required) so I can install coldboot which for the time being is said to only work on 1.0 - 3.0.0 firmwares.

I'm on 3.0.0 as well and am planning the exact same thing as you once my SX Pro arrives. :P
Atmosphère won't need 3.0.0 but a real coldboot solution most likely would require it.

Thanks for that. I am currently awaiting my SX Pro kit to arrive. I have a Switch on 3.0.2 which I think (if I'm right) is too high for coldboot anyway. In your personal opinion, is there any reason for me to stay on 3.0.2 ? I'm wanting to use exfat and so half of me is thinking fuck it, just update to the latest firmware as SX OS is supported anyway. Then half of me is getting scare-mongered into thinking what if I update and then regret it.
No. If I recall that right SciresM said anything under 3.0.2 might see a coldboot exploit but I'm not completely sure about that.
However I recommend you to use this guide to upgrade your firmware to keep your fuses. Just in case.

Edit: Sry, mixed up "won't" and "might" lol.
 
Last edited by lordelan,
  • Like
Reactions: GunzOfNavarone

Mr. Wizard

Ending the spread of bullshit one thread at a time
Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2015
Messages
1,814
Trophies
0
Location
E8 lattice
XP
1,532
Country
Canada
I'm on 3.0.0 as well and am planning the exact same thing as you once my SX Pro arrives. :P
Atmosphère won't need 3.0.0 but a real coldboot solution most likely would require it.


No. If I recall that right SciresM said anything under 3.0.2 might see a coldboot exploit but I'm not completely sure about that.
However I recommend you to use this guide to upgrade your firmware to keep your fuses. Just in case.

Edit: Sry, mixed up "won't" and "might" lol.
firmware-status-png.124905

https://gbatemp.net/threads/firmware-status.495078/
 
Last edited by Mr. Wizard,
Status
Not open for further replies.

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
    AncientBoi @ AncientBoi: :O:rofl2: +1