D
It also helps that everyone is crammed together like sardines in Japan.Japan has an amazing internet infrastructure, in the US it sucks.
What are you talking about. 1&1 provides 100mb/s on glass fiber, while 02 does exactly the same in Germany while Belgium also provides internet over a 100mb/s and most European countries doIn Japan its okay ... In Germany its a No-Go. I d never buy a streaming only game
What are you talking about. 1&1 provides 100mb/s on glass fiber, while 02 does exactly the same in Germany while Belgium also provides internet over a 100mb/s and most European countries do
Sure. . Wake Up. Not every village has it... here its like 758 ... no..... not 758k. And it stays like that in my whole area until 2025What are you talking about. 1&1 provides 100mb/s on glass fiber, while 02 does exactly the same in Germany while Belgium also provides internet over a 100mb/s and most European countries do
So you don't have providers who provide the same speed over coax like Telenet does here and provide 200mbps internet over coax for people that don't have access to fiber wireSure. . Wake Up. Not every village has it... here its like 758 ... no..... not 758k. And it stays like that in my whole area until 2025there s a lot villages like that all around Germany.
Yes. And its common here. And i know some villages that dont even have isdn speed (Unitymedia started in some towns though...) ... so in germany its not good to offer a game in Cloud only. In 2025 most villages have at least 50.000 (its a law). After that date it World je possible ... still would suck to offer no Card ...So you don't have providers who provide the same speed over coax like Telenet does here and provide 200mbps internet over coax for people that don't have access to fiber wire
If they charged like 30$ a year with online as well. To get access to classic titles ala. Netflix style. I would be all for it.they would almost certainly loose more actual sales to this tactic than they would prevent imaginary sales lost to piracy, honestly it just seems like a way for Nintendo to bolster some top level games that the switch isn't capable of just on paper to make the console seem more versatile
personally I think its about time Nintendo adapt a netfilx style solution to retro games with a small fee to access all their back catalogue, I know for me I would prefer that option and it would give Nintendo an opportunity to be ahead of the curve as this is obviously where things are headed, maybe even make a tiered system where a higher monthly cost = newer titles, honestly if Nintendo embraced that style of distribution they might actually be able to steal some emulator users for the sheer convenience, I know I "obtain" a lot less tv content thanks to Netflix....infact I cant really remember the last time I felt like "obtaining" tv/films from dubious sources as its easier to just browse netfilx and find something to watch

Ur also forgetting that Nintendo is okay with this since they are the ones allowing it on the platform in the first plaxeCapcom employ: "Hey, nintendo just announced a hybrid console so that you can play on the go."
Capcom CEO: "That's amazing. Lets release a game that needs permanent internet connection then."

I'm just pointing out Capcom's logic. I don't care what Nintendo thinks about it.Ur also forgetting that Nintendo is okay with this since they are the ones allowing it on the platform in the first plaxe





