Hacking Does anybody know when I can install legit cias on 11.0?

[cearp]

downgrade IS installing legit cia. they are THE SAME THING.

no, downgrade involves patching a check that only lets us install versions equal or higher.
we can install legit cias without patching that.

 

[Deleted member 373223]

no, downgrade involves patching a check that only lets us install versions equal or higher.
we can install legit cias without patching that.

i mean, thypically.

 

[cearp]

i mean, thypically.

ok, i understand what you mean

 

[froggestspirit]

Didn't V11 introduce something to prevent downgrades by uninstalling->reinstalling?

 

[astronautlevel]

Didn't V11 introduce something to prevent downgrades by uninstalling->reinstalling?

Read my previous posts here. TL;DR: It did but it did it on the wrong protocols so it's still possible, but not for NFIRM so it's useless anyway.

 

[froggestspirit]

Read my previous posts here. TL;DR: It did but it did it on the wrong protocols so it's still possible, but not for NFIRM so it's useless anyway.

So pretty much we're stuck with hardmod to downgrade NFIRM?

 

[astronautlevel]

So pretty much we're stuck with hardmod to downgrade NFIRM?

Until there's an arm9 exploit on 11.0

 

[Justinde75]

Until there's an arm9 exploit on 11.0

And when do you think that will be?

 

[Deleted User]

And when do you think that will be?

Maybe never, maybe tomorrow, nobody knows.

 

[astronautlevel]

And when do you think that will be?

Well, I'm not in a position to give a timetable, but the guy who's reversing it is absolutely brilliant so I doubt it'll take too much longer, maybe a few weeks.

Don't get needlessly hyped though.

 

[Justinde75]

Maybe never, maybe tomorrow, nobody knows.

Rip

 

[froggestspirit]

Don't we need an Arm9 Kernal exploit since they patched SVC backdoor?

 

[astronautlevel]

Don't we need an Arm9 Kernal exploit since they patched SVC backdoor?

svcBackDoor has nothing to do with downgrading.

We need an arm9 exploit because Process9 enforces a minimum version.

(If you were saying an arm9 userland exploit wouldn't work that's false - svcBackDoor was only stubbed on arm11, they couldn't stub it for arm9 without breaking all of Process9)

 

[Intronaut]

Read my previous posts here. TL;DR: It did but it did it on the wrong protocols so it's still possible, but not for NFIRM so it's useless anyway.

Ok, but it can be useful to instal legit cia files that doesnt install to the NAND, like a legit cia game

 

[astronautlevel]

Ok, but it can be useful to instal legit cia files that doesnt install to the NAND, like a legit cia game

That could be done without the AM service workaround and only with an arm11 kernel exploit.

 

[The Catboy]

And when do you think that will be?

When it happens.

 

[einhuman197]

There's a simple workaround. If we would have a arm11 exploit, we just have to downgrade native_firm (then that hardcoded list isn't active), then we need to restart and downgrade the rest. And boom, 9.2
All we need is a arm11 exploit...

Gesendet von meinem LG G5 mit Tapatalk

 

[astronautlevel]

There's a simple workaround. If we would have a arm11 exploit, we just have to downgrade native_firm (then that hardcoded list isn't active), then we need to restart and downgrade the rest. And boom, 9.2
All we need is a arm11 exploit...

Gesendet von meinem LG G5 mit Tapatalk

You can't downgrade NATIVE_FIRM from 11.0 (even with an arm11 exploit) due to the hardcoded list.

 

[solress]

There's a simple workaround. If we would have a arm11 exploit, we just have to downgrade native_firm (then that hardcoded list isn't active), then we need to restart and downgrade the rest. And boom, 9.2
All we need is a arm11 exploit...

Gesendet von meinem LG G5 mit Tapatalk

An ARM11 exploit isn't going to be able to let you downgrade NFIRM since it can't bypass the minimal title version list

 

[einhuman197]

Ah, I understand. But I think somebody will find a workaround . The questions is when...

Gesendet von meinem LG G5 mit Tapatalk