- Joined
- Jan 13, 2015
- Messages
- 3,825
- Solutions
- 4
- Reaction score
- 8,511
- Trophies
- 3
- Location
- The State of Denial
- Website
- gbatemp.net
- XP
- 5,719
- Country

So basically everyone has to do without until someone finds another vulnerability because of idiots that will update their systems. Why are we catering to the lowest common denominator? I say sink or swim.Actually, it works like this.
There's a 5.5 kernel exploit working and ready for release. The developers are keeping it because Nintendo may not know about the entrypoint/vulnerability.
Now, if Nintendo releases a new firmware, and the entrypoint isn't patched, then the exploit automatically works for that firmware.
If we release it now and Nintendo finds out, they'll patch it. Then, the exploit works only for 5.5 and a new exploit must be found for the next firmware.
What is the best outcome here? If we had two exploits, one would be released and the second would be kept. Easy.
But we only have this one, and it's best to keep it compatible and reliable.
Not to mention, if it is shared sooner more people would be able to look for other vulnerabilities, or ways to reuse the one we have. Look at the 3ds scene and all the downgrade and entry point methods. Smea didn't make them all. He just shared memchunkhax. Just because a small group of hackers have the ability to control the flow of a particular scene doesn't mean it's a good idea for them to do so. Hacking and politics take two very different skillsets.














