Homebrew Yellows8's Browserhax thread

[Alex3dss]

Can't get it to work on my 4.5.0-10E o3ds sysnand at all - tried everything.
Not too bothered as I have almost every other entrypoint available, but this one would have been the most convenient on my sysnand.

If you followed all the instructions then it should work. Or just try again

 

[ihaveahax]

Can't get it to work on my 4.5.0-10E o3ds sysnand at all - tried everything.
Not too bothered as I have almost every other entrypoint available, but this one would have been the most convenient on my sysnand.

This is based on Ninjhax 2 I believe, which is 9.0+ only.

 

[Alex3dss]

This is based on Ninjhax 2 I believe, which is 9.0+ only.

Go here and look for your version
http://3dbrew.org/wiki/Homebrew_Exploits

 

[ihaveahax]

Go here and look for your version
http://3dbrew.org/wiki/Homebrew_Exploits

Still only 9.0+. Versions below 9.0 are under "Exploits without Homebrew Launcher (Not recommended)".

 

[duwen]

This is based on Ninjhax 2 I believe, which is 9.0+ only.

I understand that... but I currently use a CN Ninjhax 1.1 entrypoint on sysnand and a CN ninjhax 2.1 entrypoint on emunand on the same system - both access the same loader, only the payload is different. In that regard browserhax would give me access to ninjhax 2.2 on sysnand while still having the option of ninjhax 1.1 via CN.

Plus, OP states compatability with 4.5 fw.

 

[ihaveahax]

I understand that... but I currently use a CN Ninjhax 1.1 entrypoint on sysnand and a CN ninjhax 2.1 entrypoint on emunand on the same system - both access the same loader, only the payload is different. In that regard browserhax would give me access to ninjhax 2.2 on sysnand while still having the option of ninjhax 1.1 via CN.

Plus, OP states compatability with 4.5 fw.

Technically it can run code, but it can't run 3DSX homebrew right now due to no payload for that version. http://3dbrew.org/wiki/Homebrew_Exploits

 

[teampleb]

Can't get it to work on my 4.5.0-10E o3ds sysnand at all - tried everything.
Not too bothered as I have almost every other entrypoint available, but this one would have been the most convenient on my sysnand.

Those of you trying to run HBL from browserhax on a firmware that is less than 9.0, it will not do anything for you. Yes, the hack works on less than 9.0, however, there is no ninjhax2 payload for anything under 9.0. Therefore, on that firmware, it's main use is for developers. There is nothing for the end user yet.

Please at least read the same page.

 

[duwen]

Please at least read the same page.

Please at least update the OP to stop misleading people as to which fw's are compatible.

 

[teampleb]

Please at least update the OP to stop misleading people as to which fw's are compatible.

Browserhax is compatible with 4.x, the payload isn't. If you read Mass's post you'd know that.

 

[ihaveahax]

Browserhax is compatible with 4.x, the payload isn't. If you read Mass's post you'd know that.

You should definitely note that, though. It's compatible, but kind of useless to most people right now due to the lack of a payload for versions lower than 9.0.

 

[duwen]

Browserhax is compatible with 4.x, the payload isn't. If you read Mass's post you'd know that.

Read the OP. Saw compatability list. Thought it was odd that it said it would work on 4.x, but tried to get the hack to work anyway. Failed. Came back read everything... and seriously, for the amount of people saying the same as me "OP says compatible, but it doesn't work for fw x.x", you know what... FIX THE FUCKING OP!

 

[teampleb]

Read the OP. Saw compatability list. Thought it was odd that it said it would work on 4.x, but tried to get the hack to work anyway. Failed. Came back read everything... and seriously, for the amount of people saying the same as me "OP says compatible, but it doesn't work for fw x.x", you know what... FIX THE FUCKING OP!

You where replied to directly. If you didn't read it, that's not my fault.

 

[ihaveahax]

Since this is being said as a replacement for things like tubehax, the fact that it's useless to most people below 9.0 due to the lack of a payload should be noted somewhere. Being simply compatible doesn't really matter when you compare it to other exploits like tubehax.

 

[duwen]

You where replied to directly. If you didn't read it, that's not my fault.

Yes, after I read the OP and wasted my time trying to get the thing to work. Just fix the OP or expect further posts along similar lines.

 

[teampleb]

Since this is being said as a replacement for things like tubehax, the fact that it's useless to most people below 9.0 due to the lack of a payload should be noted somewhere. Being simply compatible doesn't really matter when you compare it to other exploits like tubehax.

Yes, but since this is a browser based exploit, compatibility could be added anytime. I'm not changing the OP, the exploit works on 4.x.

Yes, after I read the OP and wasted my time trying to get the thing to work. Just fix the OP or expect further posts along similar lines.

That compatibility list comes directly from the GitHub page.

 

[ihaveahax]

Yes, but since this is a browser based exploit, compatibility could be added anytime. I'm not changing the OP, the exploit works on 4.x.

It really would save everyone time if you simply said there's no payload for versions under 9.0. I don't get why this is so hard. At that point, it's not a replacement for tubehax or other exploits.

 

[teampleb]

It really would save everyone time if you simply said there's no payload for versions under 9.0. I don't get why this is so hard. At that point, it's not a replacement for tubehax or other exploits.

I'm not sure, but I think tubehax doesn't work on 4.x too.

 

[duwen]

I'm not sure, but I think tubehax doesn't work on 4.x too.

Yes, and that's obvious because you need fw 7 or something for the youtube app.
Stop being a stubborn prick and edit the OP.

 

[ihaveahax]

I'm not sure, but I think tubehax doesn't work on 4.x too.

No, it doesn't.

Sure, browserhax is compatible with all of those versions. Most people, however, are probably expecting to run Ninjhax 2-based homebrew using it, and since NH2 only runs on 9.0 and above, it renders browserhax pointless to most people since they can't do anything with it.

 

[teampleb]

No, it doesn't.

Sure, browserhax is compatible with all of those versions. Most people, however, are probably expecting to run Ninjhax 2-based homebrew using it, and since NH2 only runs on 9.0 and above, it renders browserhax pointless to most people since they can't do anything with it.

Doesn't mean I should say it's incompatible though. As that's false.