Hacking [Tutorial] How to have two emunand (MT + CFW) on the same SD for 4.X 3DS

  • Thread starter Thread starter nop90
  • Start date Start date
  • Views Views 27,145
  • Replies Replies 98
  • Likes Likes 11
What particular launcher? if you usa un unencrypted laucher.dat (any kind of unencrypted launcer.dat, i.e. the CFW launcher, a homebrew, the xorpad extractor ...) you can simply rename it "msetforboss.dat" and can launch it with the DS profile exploit after installing the rop hack with the option 3 in multiroploader.nds.

You can't use a crypted msetforboss.dat whith this option because the injected rop only loads the file in memory. The GW rop after loading it, also decrypt it's content. At the moment afaik no one made a open source rop for crypted launcher named msetfroboss.dat

If you want use it for launching the CFW with the 2nd emunand, and if you don't want renaming files, I included a ready to use msetforboss.dat launcher in the zip.

I actually want to run two different gateway emunands so I can have one on 9.5 for everything and one on < 9.2 so I can run ninjahax
 
Hey nop90, but NTR CFW have his own arm11.bin... i can overwrite arm11 with this in For 3DS SD folder or i cant use ntr cfw as second emunand?

You only need the palantine CFW arm11.bin to install devmenu, when done you can delete it and copy on the SD the one for the NTR CFW.

But remember to not press the L key when launching the Palantine CFW.
 
I actually want to run two different gateway emunands so I can have one on 9.5 for everything and one on < 9.2 so I can run ninjahax

And how do you plan to run the second GW emunand? This tutorial is only for Palantine CFW as second emunand.
 
I don't want a CFW I have 4.5 and Gateway and just want to be able to chose 2 different emunands to boot. One on the latest and one on 9.2 or less
this is as close as you will get without 2 SD cards, its still only going to work with (MT/GW/NTR CFW) + CFW, the edited CFW is the only thing making this work, unless you feel like hacking the gateway launcher this is all you can have

best advice for you would be to email gateway and ask if they will allow a similar setup but with 2 x GW emunands, i doubt anyone will be working on modding the GW FW.......maybe you could ask the guy making the NTR CFW if he can accommodate your needs in a update
 
this is as close as you will get without 2 SD cards, its still only going to work with (MT/GW/NTR CFW) + CFW, the edited CFW is the only thing making this work, unless you feel like hacking the gateway launcher this is all you can have


Thanks for clarifying; I guess a cfw is better then 2 sd cards. Thanks
 
You only need the palantine CFW arm11.bin to install devmenu, when done you can delete it and copy on the SD the one for the NTR CFW.

But remember to not press the L key when launching the Palantine CFW.
devmenu? you not mean in this way to use devmenu on NTR cfw in the end, right? because if i want to install 9.4 emunand + NTR cfw... i dont see why i need palantine amr11.bin to install devmenu
 
._. ... i say something wrong?

You can not just because the CFW NTR has the call to emunand encrypted so you can not change the set value. Instead CFW Palantine has all the sources readable, and therefore editable. So you can easily change the attachment point of the first sector of the nand dump that resides on sd.
italian version:
Non si può semplicemente perchè il CFW NTR ha la chiamata alla emunand criptata quindi non si può modificare il valore impostato. Al contrario il CFW palantine ha tutti i sorgenti leggibili e quindi modificabili. Quindi è facilmente possibile modificare il punto di aggancio del primo settore del dump della nand che risiede sulla sd.
 
You can not just because the CFW NTR has the call to emunand encrypted so you can not change the set value. Instead CFW Palantine has all the sources readable, and therefore editable. So you can easily change the attachment point of the first sector of the nand dump that resides on sd.
italian version:
Non si può semplicemente perchè il CFW NTR ha la chiamata alla emunand criptata quindi non si può modificare il valore impostato. Al contrario il CFW palantine ha tutti i sorgenti leggibili e quindi modificabili. Quindi è facilmente possibile modificare il punto di aggancio del primo settore del dump della nand che risiede sulla sd.
Ah i know this, but then how he speak about Palantine CFW if i say many times that i want 9.2 emunand + NTR CFW? Im not interested with Palantine CFW, and want to know if i need to apply tutorial as 2 GW and not GW+CFW since ntr is a modded gateway, and how to swap exploit with multiroploader if second emunand need msetforboss.dat and NTR CFW want launcher.dat (which option with roploader if both 9.2 and ntr cfw are gateway)
 
Ah i know this, but then how he speak about Palantine CFW if i say many times that i want 9.2 emunand + NTR CFW? Im not interested with Palantine CFW, and want to know if i need to apply tutorial as 2 GW and not GW+CFW since ntr is a modded gateway, and how to swap exploit with multiroploader if second emunand need msetforboss.dat and NTR CFW want launcher.dat (which option with roploader if both 9.2 and ntr cfw are gateway)
That is not what this tutorial is for, the OP is getting a bit peeved as he has said about 8 time now that this is for Palantine cfw + 1 GW based launcher.......it's nothing to do with msetforboss vs launcher.dat, it's down to how each launcher works, to make a gateway launcher boot from the second emunand partition you would need to modify the gateway launcher........that is beyond the scope of this thread, it is not what the OP is doing and It seems he has no interest in doing so, so people should stop pestering him for it with pointless "I WANT THIS!" If you want a modified gateway launcher, go for it, but he has said that he is not working on that

It's not that he doesn't understand the question, it's that you don't seem to understand the answer
 
So to start the CFW NTR on the second sector should change the launcher gateway, but it is encrypted, bisnogrebbe or ask the author of the CFW NTR, or gateway to the team if they are willing to do this. As I wrote CFW NTR E Emunand GW / MT has the code that causes the boot criptato.e why nop created a script where you boota the CFW Palantine in the second position because it is impossible to decide where to make the boot emunand GW / MT or NTR.
 
That is not what this tutorial is for, the OP is getting a bit peeved as he has said about 8 time now that this is for Palantine cfw + 1 GW based launcher.......it's nothing to do with msetforboss vs launcher.dat, it's down to how each launcher works, to make a gateway launcher boot from the second emunand partition you would need to modify the gateway launcher........that is beyond the scope of this thread, it is not what the OP is doing and It seems he has no interest in doing so, so people should stop pestering him for it with pointless "I WANT THIS!" If you want a modified gateway launcher, go for it, but he has said that he is not working on that

It's not that he doesn't understand the question, it's that you don't seem to understand the answer
Just he say also that for NTR CFW is the same method, but i not understand which steps change since palantine and NTR are not same thing...
 
Just he say also that for NTR CFW is the same method, but i not understand which steps change since palantine and NTR are not same thing...
Yes the gateway based launchers are much more complicated than the Palantine cfw, they are encrypted and obfuscated, if you want to do that your on your own, as I said, that is beyond the scope of this thread and a much much more complicated process
 
Yes the gateway based launchers are much more complicated than the Palantine cfw, they are encrypted and obfuscated, if you want to do that your on your own, as I said, that is beyond the scope of this thread and a much much more complicated process
So if is not possible to have both NTR and emunNAD on same SD why we waste so many post to speak about instead to say at begin "Not possible"? xD
 
So if is not possible to have both NTR and emunNAD on same SD why we waste so many post to speak about instead to say at begin "Not possible"? xD
He has said no it's not possible ATM several times, maybe he should of been more direct and just said NO YOU CANNOT, but he has been trying to explain why you cannot rather than just being rude and saying go away
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum