Hacking Wii U Hacking & Homebrew Discussion

yahoo

G͝B͢A͜t͞em҉p̡ R̨e͢g̷ul̨aŗ
Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2014
Messages
345
Trophies
0
XP
522
Country
United States
Actually not even an IOSU exploit would allow that, you'd have to defeat the loader because now it checks if the program is legit both at install time and every time you open it, so even if you were somehow able to install it you couldn't make it boot.

Ah, right. Is the loader part of IOSU?
 

Marionumber1

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2010
Messages
1,234
Trophies
3
XP
4,045
Country
United States
Ah, right. Is the loader part of IOSU?


No, the loader is PowerPC code with higher privileges, though still limited to userspace. Since it handles RPX/RPL loading, it has the ability to make memory writable and executable. NWP is somewhat mistaken about its role. IOSU's security code verifies titles that it launches, and Cafe OS invokes the loader to actually put the executable and its libraries in memory.
 

BullyWiiPlaza

Nintendo Hacking <3
Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2014
Messages
1,932
Trophies
0
XP
2,477
Country
Germany
Actually not even an IOSU exploit would allow that, you'd have to defeat the loader because now it checks if the program is legit both at install time and every time you open it, so even if you were somehow able to install it you couldn't make it boot.

Basically like the 3DS then. Gateway got a userland browser exploit which then triggers a kernel exploit to let them boot into a custom firmware. Installed apps are non-persistent and won't boot in the "normal" system menu.

So basically the same should be doable for the Wii U, shouldn't it? :P
 

NWPlayer123

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2012
Messages
2,642
Trophies
0
Location
The Everfree Forest
XP
6,693
Country
United States
Basically like the 3DS then. Gateway got a userland browser exploit which then triggers a kernel exploit to let them boot into a custom firmware. Installed apps are non-persistent and won't boot in the "normal" system menu.

So basically the same should be doable for the Wii U, shouldn't it? :P

Theoretically, yes, you could port Linux or MN1's DarkSide OS, or a custom firmware and boot into it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TeamScriptKiddies

75mak

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2011
Messages
395
Trophies
0
XP
313
Country
Theoretically, yes, you could port Linux or MN1's DarkSide OS, or a custom firmware and boot into it.
That sounds like quite a lot of possibilities. You devs have really achieved a lot and i know a lot of people are grateful for your work on this.

I just wonder why there seems to be so little interest from most people who matter (other devs) on developing a homebrew 'framework' for the wii U?
 

WulfyStylez

SALT/Bemani Princess
Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
1,149
Trophies
0
XP
2,877
Country
United States
That sounds like quite a lot of possibilities. You devs have really achieved a lot and i know a lot of people are grateful for your work on this.

I just wonder why there seems to be so little interest from most people who matter (other devs) on developing a homebrew 'framework' for the wii U?

I'm sure the interest will be there once kernel stuff is public and development on a framework can actually start.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VinsCool

IbbyPlays

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2014
Messages
236
Trophies
0
Age
23
XP
272
Country
United States
For future reference, does a use-after-free bug with a working LayoutTest mean you've found an exploitable bug?
 

KungFuzion

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2015
Messages
364
Trophies
0
Age
40
XP
1,165
Country
I looked at another thread (can't remember where, it was a few days ago) where someone is reverse engineering Gatway's code & looking into how they get the launcher.dat to boot through the new webkit exploit. Would it even be possible to go down the emunand route with the wii u?
 

WulfyStylez

SALT/Bemani Princess
Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
1,149
Trophies
0
XP
2,877
Country
United States
I looked at another thread (can't remember where, it was a few days ago) where someone is reverse engineering Gatway's code & looking into how they get the launcher.dat to boot through the new webkit exploit. Would it even be possible to go down the emunand route with the wii u?

It depends on how various modules interact with the system nand, but I wouldn't say it's impossible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KungFuzion

IbbyPlays

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2014
Messages
236
Trophies
0
Age
23
XP
272
Country
United States
So my question from a long time ago still stands. If games and most software run in userspace, can we store our programs on the system as browser save-data.
 

A Plus Ric

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2014
Messages
823
Trophies
0
Age
43
XP
709
Country
United States
Has there been any progress evaluating my bug? I know there isn't a definitive conclusion (you would have told me), but have you looked into it yet?



f0a1a0e1473bf5e5174b699b5d84d081b0bdc1b9820135c12453d93476157b39.jpg
 

Kurausukun

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2014
Messages
221
Trophies
0
Age
27
XP
354
Country
United States
I know this is a super non-sequitur, but I need an answer: Does DiscU work on Windows 7 x64? Because on my system, it seems to be missing some dependencies that are Windows 8-only (though this could be an error).
 

NWPlayer123

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2012
Messages
2,642
Trophies
0
Location
The Everfree Forest
XP
6,693
Country
United States
I know this is a super non-sequitur, but I need an answer: Does DiscU work on Windows 7 x64? Because on my system, it seems to be missing some dependencies that are Windows 8-only (though this could be an error).

I see no reason why it shouldn't work, I don't have Windows 7 to test though. What specifically does it say?
EDIT: Also, can we continue this dicussion over here?
 

DrunkenMonk

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2007
Messages
523
Trophies
1
Age
31
XP
1,751
Country
United Kingdom
This.
and it's not "your" bug.

He's using it as a form of reference, it's not him attempting to gloat or anything.
It's shorter than writing "on that bug which was posted earlier by me?" since he has only posted one 'bug'. It's simpler for everybody if he labels it as such.
No confusing references in between, just solid information.

Please let us just not argue semantics, and keep the discussion civil.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
    K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2: Oops gotta hide :shy: