As far as your other block quotes, yes...what you said was reiterating what I said. Not sure how that counts as me lacking reading comprehension when you just reword what I said.
My point of contention is you using school shootings and terrorist attacks as the counterpoint to this study. In those situations, they always talk about VIOLENT video games and their impact. So using that as a counterpoint insinuates that this study has something to say on the matter of violent video games. It doesn't. You agreed with me and insulted me at the same time.
The only point of contention we have is that you said you insinuated nothing. You did, though probably by accident. It's cool, it's just misleading.
yeah....you sound like you're trying to correct me on something, but we're in complete agreement.