PS1/2 Best speed to write iso?

TheDarkOne

Active Member
OP
Newcomer
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
29
Trophies
0
Website
www.youtube.com
XP
161
Country
United States
I've seen all over the internet people saying 1x 4x or 8x. I'll be receiving my memory card in the mail probally by tomorrow and wanted to check with someone who has done this a lot and can tell me from experience. Most, if not all games will be DVD iso's if that matters. I also have DVD Decryptor and IMGBurn on my PC.

Thanks.
 

trumpet-205

Embrace the darkness within
Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2009
Messages
4,363
Trophies
0
Website
Visit site
XP
693
Country
United States
The reason people tell you to write at lower speeds is becasue there is a less risk of there being an error during the burning process. You CAN burn at any supported speeds though.
This is old thinking. This thinking back then was because HDD cannot keep up with buffer.

Now days, if you have to burn at low speed to produce working disc, it means you are either using crappy burner and/or crappy disc. When a quality disc is rated 8x, it means its dye is designed to burn at 8x, not 4x, not 2x.

Modern burner doesn't even support low speed burning anyway.

Gigaware DVD-R is a batch from RICOH, its quality is mixed bag (leans more toward bad).
 

Isaac

American
Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2012
Messages
320
Trophies
0
Location
Here? Right here? What about, say... over there?
XP
411
Country
United States
This is old thinking. This thinking back then was because HDD cannot keep up with buffer.

Now days, if you have to burn at low speed to produce working disc, it means you are either using crappy burner and/or crappy disc. When a quality disc is rated 8x, it means its dye is designed to burn at 8x, not 4x, not 2x.

Modern burner doesn't even support low speed burning anyway.

Gigaware DVD-R is a batch from RICOH, its quality is mixed bag (leans more toward bad).
Really? Well, the more you know. *insert rainbow here*
 

stomp_442

New Member
Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2009
Messages
1,830
Trophies
1
XP
738
Country
United States
I've always burned at 4x and found that the best. Not too slow and not to fast. Make sure to use a good quality disc if you want them to last. I plain disagree with the statement "the fastest speed that your burner and disc supports". Don't be in such a fucking hurry, 4x is only a few minutes longer.
 

trumpet-205

Embrace the darkness within
Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2009
Messages
4,363
Trophies
0
Website
Visit site
XP
693
Country
United States
I've always burned at 4x and found that the best. Not too slow and not to fast. Make sure to use a good quality disc if you want them to last. I plain disagree with the statement "the fastest speed that your burner and disc supports". Don't be in such a fucking hurry, 4x is only a few minutes longer.
This isn't about being in a hurry. If your burner supports quality check you'll be surprised that at rated speed it yields the highest quality, even if data integrity is intact.

Of course this assumes you are using quality burner and disc.
 

stomp_442

New Member
Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2009
Messages
1,830
Trophies
1
XP
738
Country
United States
This isn't about being in a hurry. If your burner supports quality check you'll be surprised that at rated speed it yields the highest quality, even if data integrity is intact.

I've been burning dvd's for many years and would never believe that. Just because a burner and disc state 16x don't mean it will yield the best results. What about longevity when burning at the max speed? More than likely most of the members and/or visitors here don't have a quality burner, nor are they using the best blank media. Maybe you should find out what they have and are using before recommendations. 4x is a safe speed for people that aren't using the best media or hardware.
 

DarkWork0

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2011
Messages
184
Trophies
1
XP
633
Country
United States
I've always used 2x-4x and never had problems either. I've only ran into problems with higher speeds even with a new dvd burner and the best dvds for the job.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    They have FSR or whatever it's called and yeah it's still not great
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    so AMD seem to finally be starting to take AI seriously
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    Oh yeah those new 8000 CPUs have AI cores built in that's interesting
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    Maybe they plan on offloading to the CPU?
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    Would be kinda cool to have the CPU and GPU working in random more
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    Tandem even
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    i think i heard of that, it's a good idea, shouldn't need a dedicated GPU just to run a LLM or video upscaling
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    even the nvidia shield tv has AI video upscaling
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    LLMs can be run on cpu anyway but it's quite slow
  • BakerMan @ BakerMan:
    Have you ever been beaten by a wet spaghetti noodle by your girlfriend because she has a twin sister, and you got confused and fucked her dad?
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    I had a girlfriend who had a twin sister and they would mess with me constantly.... Until one chipped a tooth then finally I could tell them apart.... Lol
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    They would have the same hair style the same clothes everything... Really messed with my head lol
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    @The Real Jdbye, I could see AMD trying to pull off the CPU GPU tandem thing, would be a way to maybe close the gap a bit with Nvidia. Plus it would kinda put Nvidia at a future disadvantage since Nvidia can't make X86/64 CPUs? Intel and AMD licensing issues... I wonder how much that has held back innovation.
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    i don't think nvidia wants to get in the x64 cpu market anyways
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    you've seen how much intel is struggling getting into the gpu market
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    and nvidia is already doing ARM
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    i don't think they want to take more focus away from their gpus
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    Yeah I think Nvidia s future lays in AI GPU acceleration stuff if they can get that going it's going to be super interesting in the long term
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    AI assisted game creation might become a thing
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    At least that's something I think would be pretty cool.
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    Don some VR glasses and gloves and talk to the computer and paint entire worlds
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    "OK Cortana I want that mountain a little taller and more snow on top, and I would like some random ancient pine forest around the bottom"
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    "Now we need a spring fed river flowing down the north side and add some wild life appropriate for the biome"
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    Many TBs of assets and the programming of something like that is going to be tough but I think it's something we might see in 20 years maybe sooner
    Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo: Many TBs of assets and the programming of something like that is going to be tough but I think...