Hey guys,
Listen to
ggyo
I think he's correct.
Oh and how many of you have notice the Jury was as far away from a representation of Trayvon as possible. All older white (well one was hispanic/white i think?) women.
No blacks, no men and no younger people. That just screams "planted jury". But hey, america would never do something like that now
1. There was one "black hispanic" juror on the jury.
2. George Zimmerman is not white, despite what the media says. He is hispanic.
Anyway, I think we really need to just ignore the noise being made by the racist/race-baiting mainstream media, and just look at the facts of this case. The fact is that there is no evidence or proof that Zimmerman did anything illegal in this encounter, and the evidence indicates that Martin was the one who first initiated the violence (which is illegal). Zimmerman's account of the story is consistent with the available evidence. Yes, unfortunately, we don't have Martin's side of the story, but Zimmerman is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, and there is no proof to counter his claims.
According to Zimmerman, Martin started the physical confrontation, and the injuries on both individuals are consistent with Zimmerman's account. Zimmerman had injuries to his nose and back of his head, where Martin only had injuries to his knuckles, and obviously, the fatal gunshot wound. Zimmerman had no injuries to his knuckles. Again, the available evidence supports his claims.
As I said earlier in this thread, I think Zimmerman could have handled the situation better, but he still did nothing illegal in the encounter. Also, there is no evidence or proof that Zimmerman was racist toward black people. In fact, the evidence available strongly suggests otherwise.
