I think he was talking about the Xbox.Why the hell would you want a premade and risk not being able to upgrade or replace essential components?
I think he was talking about the Xbox.Why the hell would you want a premade and risk not being able to upgrade or replace essential components?

Well then it's bad satire - with a wallet "thick" enough (with wads of cash) you can build quite a beefy one without sweat.I think that was satire.
As mentioned above, satire has to be accurate to be funny.I think he was talking about the Xbox.
>implying he was inaccurateAs mentioned above, satire has to be accurate to be funny.![]()

Depends on how broad your definition of "PC" is - for all intents and purposes, any personal device that computes is a personal computer.>implying he was inaccurate![]()

Any machine capable of running Windows.Depends on how broad your definition of "PC" is - for all intents and purposes, any personal device that computes is a personal computer.![]()

I disagree with that definition on so many levels...Any machine capable of running Windows.
![]()
But Macs can run Windows.The distinction between "PC" and "Others" is something perpetrated by Apple to "prove" that Mac's are totally nothing like PC's...

Right. Sorry. Getting to my point now.can we go back on topic please.
Foxi4, Veho, please
thanks. please, thanks.
They wanted to gauge the public's reaction to the PS4 features, so they could adjust theirs accordingly.I really have to wonder why Microsoft has waited so goddamned long for this announcement. They've given Sony such a huge start I was starting to wonder if they were even in the same race anymore.

...and wasted a lot of time, taking hits left and right due to negative rumours. Now not only they have to top Sony's offer, they need to clean their name - here's for hoping they have loads of stuff to show, they really need to make an "Oomph".They wanted to gauge the public's reaction to the PS4 features, so they could adjust theirs accordingly.
Or maybe the rumors were true and an actual leak and Microsoft used the public reaction as a huge pre-alpha test of the proposed functions before wasting money on implementation, or now have time to undo them before launch, if they decide they would have harmed sales. In any case this delay, and the rumors, gives them time to adjust. It's better the negative reactions be to the rumors than to the official announcement, if you're not intent on sticking to the policy and negative reactions be damned *cough*no rumble in sixaxis*cough*move*cough*. And officially denying the rumors (providing they aren't true, of course) will have every news source that regurgitated the rumors falling over themselves to publish corrections, and that will garner enough publicity....and wasted a lot of time, taking hits left and right due to negative rumours. Now not only they have to top Sony's offer, they need to clean their name - here's for hoping they have loads of stuff to show, they really need to make an "Oomph".

So who else thinks they will somehow integrate Windows 8 (well RT or something) with the console?
they've always been talking of unification
I'm expecting that to happen. They've been talking about integrating every device you own into a monolithic home network, and if nothing else we should see some sort of SmartGlass 2, connecting your Xbox to your smart fridge via your smartphone, and everything backed up on the PC. And streaming everything to everything.So who else thinks they will somehow integrate Windows 8 (well RT or something) with the console?
they've always been talking of unification
Now I take every pain to block every ad I can everywhere I can (to the point where I waste more time, bandwidth and effort doing it than I ever would have wasted on ads if I even paid attention to them) but I have never quite figured out why some consider it quite so distasteful to have ads on a paid service.
So the 2 minutes it takes to install and set up adblock plus and TACO cost you effort and bandwidth?

Confirmed isn't the same as "coming this year." Halo 3 was certainly confirmed as coming when Halo 2 came out, but it still took a few years.
A short side-game (ODST) and a spinoff (Wars) count as "major releases" to you? Not sure where you're getting your definition. CoD gets a major release in one of its main series every year. Halo gets one every few years. There's a huge difference.

Um, yes I freaking DID mention a yearly major release in my original post. Perhaps you should read it again...Well I think everyone probably has a different perspective on what a major release could be defined as. In your original post you said that you hope to God they don't go the CoD route with yearly releases but the thing is they've already been doing this. Like I said for quite some time there has been a yearly Halo release. You never once mentioned anything about a yearly major release which is a completely different thing. And to be clear with another thing I had completely forgotten about Halo Wars which still counts as a yearly release. Although I in no way consider Halo Wars to be major because in my opinion it is a prime example of what a spin-off could be considered as in the Halo series.
Right in the sentence before mentioning CoD's yearly releases, I mentioned there being a gap between major Halo games. It's pretty obvious what I meant.Why does everyone expect Halo 5? With the exception of the 2-year gap between Reach and 4, there's always been at least 3 years between "major" Halo games. I hope to God they don't go the CoD route with yearly releases...
