Are you retarded? How is it gamestops fault, unless they dropped his WiiU on the fucking ground. They didn't manufacture it or ship the product to themselves. Gamestop is the LEAST likely culprit for the faulty shit. He likely can't go to gamestop now because they have no WiiU's to exchange. He could easily get a refund if the console is fucked, but then he'd have no WiiU at all. Or wait, it's gamestops fault the WiiU is popular?
Also using 'faggot' just makes you look like a bigot asshole, so good job there.
This blind gamestop hate is such a joke. You look like such a moron.

Clearly it's not gamestop's fault but they do have return policies to cover defective merchandise, so it's the consumer's option to take the item back to the store or deal with Nintendo. I have emailed Nintendo and not heard back yet, but I am not really too optimistic about it considering the text in the manual stating that one or two dead pixels is "normal" and not considered a defect. This is asinine, basically they are saying it's normal for their products to be imperfect.
Last I checked, the owner is in control of their wallet and a store employee can not actually force you to buy something.[...]
Ohh and they would force you to buy some kind of shit you don't need.
[...]
Ok i am an asshole and next time read what i said.
''Just go to the fucking Gamestop and say its faulty and if they won't listen then make a scene there.
I hate those Gamestop faggots....''
Who said that its gamestops fault?? Noone, i just said to take them back the WII U to them so they can replace it, but i don't think you would see that.
It would be more like a hour and hour conversation and in the end ur just gonna give up on changing it.
Ohh and they would force you to buy some kind of shit you don't need.
I experienced something like that not 1 time but 2 times and that were my first time and last time shopping there.
Nintendo's wording of it is very open to interpretation though. It said something like "not considered defective unless # of dead pixels increases over time" Does that mean going from 1-2, 2-5, 5-10? This is unknown.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defective_pixel#Manufacturer_policy
It's not just Nintendo. Virtually every LCD panel manufacturer does that.
If it's dead it'll just be black. If it's stuck it'll be stuck on some color. You can always try rubbing on the screen a bit in that area, but there's a change that the touch layer will be too firm to actually press down on the LCD.
You could always try running a stuck pixel fixer off of a website/youtube, depending on the WiiU's web capabilities.

Am I the only one who thinks this is ridiculous? If I'm gonna spend $200+ on a device I feel like the screen should work as it should. Aren't there quality control people who test the products before shipping them out? I would think a dead pixel of all things would be fairly easy to catch.For almost all LCD screens, 3 or fewer dead/stuck pixels are considered an acceptable manufacturing tolerance and are as such not covered under warranty.

Oh I absolutely agree, and that goes for any lcd panel out there. However my acceptance of it applies more to panels that develop them over time. I have a 26" Vizio and a 22" hannspree monitor (gorgeous display, too) that I've had for over a year/2 years, respectively. The hannspree developed a dead pixel a few months back, the Vizio I believe also has a dead one, but it may be stuck. I've had a syncmaster display that had a red stuck pixel, I could fix it by rubbing the screen a tiny bit after it had warmed up.Am I the only one who thinks this is ridiculous? If I'm gonna spend $200+ on a device I feel like the screen should work as it should. Aren't there quality control people who test the products before shipping them out? I would think a dead pixel of all things would be fairly easy to catch.



I don't know why people tend to have so much trouble with gamestop, the two near me never give me issues
And when the manual says that one pixel being dead is normal, that is excuse for cheaping out on the manufacturing.
Am I the only one who thinks this is ridiculous? If I'm gonna spend $200+ on a device I feel like the screen should work as it should. Aren't there quality control people who test the products before shipping them out? I would think a dead pixel of all things would be fairly easy to catch.
I guess that makes sense. My only question is, what do they do for the 2 hours between checks? Surely it can't take a full 2 hours to look at the device, turn it on, and test the buttons. Maybe I just have no idea what I'm talking about but I feel like it would be possible to check many of the devices within a 2 hour period instead of just one from the batch.Coming from a Quality Engineer, yes they do. However, it's not financially responsible to hire a dozen of Quality Engineers just so every LCD panel get's double checked.
They most likely have a few Quality Engineers (which depends on plant capacity, so they could have just one, but more is possible) who check every 2 hours and perform a series of tests on them. This is done to ensure that products made within a timeframe of 2 hours for example are up to the required quality. The operator of the machine will most likely only check for cracks, bends or discoloration of the panels.
In any case, it costs less to send a new panel over to the customer and deal with his/her irritation. Just throw in something cheap and they are happy. Quality Engineers aren't cheap (neither is more staff in general). It would mean they would have to up the price or lose profit over less than 0.1% of total shipped products.
Hope it makes sense.