Last Seen Movie

  • Thread starter Thread starter JuanMena
  • Start date Start date
  • Views Views 223,493
  • Replies Replies 1,445
  • Likes Likes 5
1770940371427.png

Hunter Killer (2018)

This is a real manly movie. So much so that it definitely hits stereotypical levels. Really, you've never experienced an international incident with so many best friends in tow. This was actually my second time watching, but I enjoyed it both times. It's a nice, compact story with plenty going on to keep your attention.

It's not the most original, it's not popcorn action (if that's what you're looking for), and it does rely heavily on CG. However, I'd still recommend it to anyone looking for a comfortable suspense thriller.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RustInPeace
I've been watching 1 movie a day this month. The main reason is to watch a lot of Black films. Other films were watched either because of a weekly Discord watch party, yearly traditions, or catching up with Best Picture Oscar nominees.

Groundhog Day - A yearly tradition, I almost forgot about it. Shame on me because the movie's worth watching once a year. Still one of the best 90s comedies, one of Bill Murray's best performances. It seems like every year, there's a new piece of media that has a Groundhog Day-like premise. Groundhog Day itself isn't the first timeloop movie, but I think it definitely set the stage for modern media adapting that premise. Hard to beat a pioneer though. 10/10

Hamnet
- Great period drama that is carried hard by Jessie Buckley's performance. She's definitely winning the Oscar, and it's so well deserved. She came off as an enchanted creature for most of the first half, and an absolute wreck in most of the 2nd half. She played up every emotion perfectly and was a force of nature. Having said that, her biggest competition was Noah Jupe! That was some of the finest child acting I've seen in recent memory. Even though they faithfully followed the story of the Hamnet novel, I want to believe Jupe's character died just so that Buckley had no competition. Paul Mescale was also great. Chloe Zhao's directing felt soft, gentle, but totally fitting for this movie. It feels a little spiritual and in tune with nature. I wish certain narrative choices weren't made, and sometimes the movie is too slow. But the third act really ended things on a high note. 8.5/10

Why Did I Get Married?
- Another Tyler Perry movie that sucks. It's better than his newer stuff at least. The characters are written poorly, with way too many fatphobic remarks and not a fitting enough punishment for the guy making those remarks. Some of the dialogue is horrid. For a while, it feels like nothing is happening, the plot goes too slowly. Michael Jai White was entertaining here, a rare non-action role, but he's hindered so much by the writing. I was sad for what Tyler Perry did to him. Janet Jackson was good, she had the least offensive writing. There are numerous ironically hilarious moments, but it's not enough to make this movie worth a rewatch. 4/10

Menace II Society
- This was my first time watching the film. I have seen Don't Be a Menace to South Central While Drinking Your Juice in the Hood so many times, and it lowkey ruined this movie for me! It's crazy how much of it was spoofed by the Wayans Bros. The movie still holds a lot of power. The violence depicted in the movie is shocking. The story is very thin and more or less a slice of life. However, the movie was a dazzling showcase by the Hughes Brothers, who translated their cool visual style in music videos to film. The cinematography, editing, and lighting is fantastic. The pacing is quick, the various tones are played up beautifully. Whether it be dramatic, chaotic, or even humorous! The acting is also fairly solid, with Larenz Tate shining as the charismatic, but dangerous O-Dog. The narrative is really the only weak part in the movie. Plot points are seemingly raised and dropped, but I don't think plot mattered much. The point of the movie was to show the harsh realities of living in the "hood" and it succeeded in doing that. It's nihilistic, as opposed to Boyz n' the Hood's hopefulness. I prefer Boyz n' the Hood because it was more emotionally powerful with better acting. But as far as pure craft, the Hughes Brothers were far ahead of John Singleton. It's really apples and oranges, so I can see why many people would say this is better than Boyz n' the Hood. 9/10

Tangerine
- This rewatch was through a watch party. I would've otherwise watched this around Christmas. This was my third time watching Tangerine, and my admiration for the movie has only grown. It's reached the point where I find it heartwarming in the end. Building up to that finale was hilarity, chaos, loud music, and a very striking tour of Los Angeles, captured on an iPhone. It feels very real, which goes along nicely with a wacky, but realistic story. A great cast here as well. RIP James Ransone. 9/10

Hoop Dreams
- A mark of a great movie is not feeling the runtime. At 2 hours and 51 minutes, this documentary didn't feel like a slog at all. That long runtime is necessary as there is it's basically two high school stories, with some converging. This is a highly regarded documentary for good reason. It captures the pursuit of dreams from two Black teens in Chicago. They have different family dynamics and are seemingly at the same low income bracket. However, one basically enjoyed some privileges, especially financial, while the other had to work their way up the ladder. The privileged one also worked very hard and unfortunately went through physically daunting scenarios and his coach sucked ass! I loved following both stories. It's tragic, heartwarming, and as engaging as any 3-hour epic. 9/10

Poetic Justice
- John Singleton's follow-up to Boyz n the Hood. It turned out to be a very low-key romance/drama. The storytelling is rather soft and the road trip format that dominates the movie makes things feel loose with physical detours like a picnic or African festival offering variety. The dialogue is where much of the cliches come in, and this could've been a so-so film if not for some nice visuals that show Singleton improving as a technical filmmaker, and the performances from some members of the cast. The MVP by far is Tupac. He was very charming and easily got my attention. Acting was seemingly natural to him. He and Janet Jackson had good chemistry. Jackson was also a treat here. The poetry from Maya Angelou was lovely, I guess it was the throughline of the film. It's comedic at times, but the last third is very dramatic, regardless of how unsurprising it was. It did feel like John Singleton wasn't fully capable of telling a romance story, but the attempt is respectable. It still works as that, but Tupac's arc in general is what really helped the movie. There was some development from Janet Jackson and others, but Tupac's was the most interesting. 8/10

South Central
- This was the kind of hood movie John Singleton didn't want to happen if he couldn't direct Boys n the Hood. I would've expected this to be a Hollywood production, but it was an indie film that somehow had Oliver Stone attached as executive producer. It was written and directed by a white man from Colorado. It's based on the book, "The Original South Central L.A. Crips" by Donald Bakeer, a Black man, but it was fiction. The movie plays out like pure fiction with plot conveniences and complicated subjects resolved quickly, such as the finale being resolved from a speech. It felt inauthentic. The score also comes on too hard at times and is melodramatic. Most of the acting is inefficient, some is laughably bad. The guy who got his head knocked off by Jason Voorhees plays a crackhead here! The main character's kid was awful, I couldn't take him seriously. The setting doesn't feel distinct, you can tell they didn't really know South Central Los Angeles because they didn't bother showing locations all that much. The one legitimately good thing about the movie is Glenn Plummer. He was an effective lead, though he has some emotional outbursts that didn't feel right to me. I blame the writing and directing for that. Glenn Plummer also had a great, albeit small role in Menace II Society. It's interesting how in both movies, he plays a convict. Carl Lumbly was also good, but his most dramatic moments were silly. One highlight is the final speech, only because I recognized that it was spoofed in Don't Be a Menace to South Central While Drinking Your Juice in the Hood. That's really the main reason I watched South Central and a few other hood movies, to get myself ready for an upcoming revisit of a childhood favorite comedy. The ones I watched recently before South Central were great. South Central was sadly a pale imitation. 5.5/10

Marty Supreme
- The resurfacing of what went down during the filming of a sex scene in Good Time made me look at the Safdies in a negative light, especially Josh. Between that and Kevin O'Leary being an ICE bootlicker, I considered not watching Marty Supreme. Separate the art from the artist. And I have to say that the art is fucking fantastic! I absolutely loved this movie. It's modern American filmmaking at its finest, at an epic scale. The story might be predictable, but everything put into the story is incredible. It's ambitious, energetic, anxiety-inducing, and brilliantly paced. The 2 hours and 30 minutes flew by for me! It's basically the next step following Good Time and Uncut Gems. It completes what I've heard is called "The Shitbag Trilogy." The shitbag, played by Timothee Chalamet, is a scumbag, someone who drags people down, and is downright cursed. But damn, like Adam Sandler in Uncut Gems, I wanted to root for him. This is easily the best Timothee Chalamet performance I've seen, and I would be totally fine if he wins the Best Lead Actor Oscar. The cast is absolutely nuts. Kevin O'Leary sadly was great in this. He basically played himself, a complete asshole. The movie is filled to the brim with high-quality craft. It is easily one of my favorite movies of 2025. To be more exact, it's number 3, behind One Battle After Another and No Other Choice. It's also the 4th movie to get this rating. I'm now convinced 2025 was a truly great year of films. The last great movie of 2025. A masterpiece even. 10/10

Juice
- The first half of the movie was filled to the brim with hip-hop and some R&B, fitting the narrative perfectly as you get to learn about the 4 young male characters. One of them, Q, played by a very young Omar Epps, is a DJ and competes in a local competition. The DJ parts also contributed to how musically rich the movie was. I was digging that half of the movie. Then the second half felt like a major tone shift. And I also dug that! The whole narrative was very engaging, and made for an impressive directorial debut for Ernest Dickerson. His work as a cinematographer really paid off as the movie has a few strong visuals and camera shots. He worked with Spike Lee on a few of his films, including Do the Right Thing and Malcolm X. That would explain the dolly shot that resembles Spike Lee's distinct version. The second half of the movie pretty much turned to a horror flick with the villain being played by one of the four young male characters, Tupac! My goodness, Tupac's character Bishop was kind of scary, with him making some of the coldest entrances! I loved it, even when they're predictable. I wish the climax was more explosive, and there are some things not fleshed out very well, but this was a very strong 90s hood movie. A breath of fresh air for me after watching multiple hood movies set in Los Angeles. This one's set in Harlem, and the soundtrack reflects that! God, the soundtrack here is amazing. Tupac once again showed that he was a very good actor. 8/10

One of Them Days
- Basically a modern day, female-led version of Friday. I would say it leans more on the Friday sequels because those were a lot more absurd. However, the chemistry in the original Friday is closer to what this film has. It's a fun, breezy comedy set in Los Angeles. The two leads, Keke Palmer and SZA, carry this movie with their genuine bond. SZA is a major surprise as she's an R&B artist, but her acting her is better than previous R&B artists-turned actors, such as Kelly Rowland. This is another movie that reminds me how much I love Keke Palmer. She is so charismatic, so lively, she really elevates any character given to her. I really needed a brief break from the male-driven Black films. Also, all of them I watched so far this month were from the 90s. This was a lovely change of place. Some moments are too stupid, there are some notable technical errors, and the movie's wrap up is a little off, but it's consistently engaging. The supporting cast is very strong, whether it be small roles like that of Janelle James and Katt Williams, or more singificant roles like the two people chasing Palmer and SZA. Also, it's visually appealing, which I say because modern movies don't have enough colors. One of Them Days is colorful in many ways. 7.5/10
 
I've been watching 1 movie a day this month. The main reason is to watch a lot of Black films. Other films were watched either because of a weekly Discord watch party, yearly traditions, or catching up with Best Picture Oscar nominees.

Groundhog Day - A yearly tradition, I almost forgot about it. Shame on me because the movie's worth watching once a year. Still one of the best 90s comedies, one of Bill Murray's best performances. It seems like every year, there's a new piece of media that has a Groundhog Day-like premise. Groundhog Day itself isn't the first timeloop movie, but I think it definitely set the stage for modern media adapting that premise. Hard to beat a pioneer though. 10/10

Hamnet
- Great period drama that is carried hard by Jessie Buckley's performance. She's definitely winning the Oscar, and it's so well deserved. She came off as an enchanted creature for most of the first half, and an absolute wreck in most of the 2nd half. She played up every emotion perfectly and was a force of nature. Having said that, her biggest competition was Noah Jupe! That was some of the finest child acting I've seen in recent memory. Even though they faithfully followed the story of the Hamnet novel, I want to believe Jupe's character died just so that Buckley had no competition. Paul Mescale was also great. Chloe Zhao's directing felt soft, gentle, but totally fitting for this movie. It feels a little spiritual and in tune with nature. I wish certain narrative choices weren't made, and sometimes the movie is too slow. But the third act really ended things on a high note. 8.5/10

Why Did I Get Married?
- Another Tyler Perry movie that sucks. It's better than his newer stuff at least. The characters are written poorly, with way too many fatphobic remarks and not a fitting enough punishment for the guy making those remarks. Some of the dialogue is horrid. For a while, it feels like nothing is happening, the plot goes too slowly. Michael Jai White was entertaining here, a rare non-action role, but he's hindered so much by the writing. I was sad for what Tyler Perry did to him. Janet Jackson was good, she had the least offensive writing. There are numerous ironically hilarious moments, but it's not enough to make this movie worth a rewatch. 4/10

Menace II Society
- This was my first time watching the film. I have seen Don't Be a Menace to South Central While Drinking Your Juice in the Hood so many times, and it lowkey ruined this movie for me! It's crazy how much of it was spoofed by the Wayans Bros. The movie still holds a lot of power. The violence depicted in the movie is shocking. The story is very thin and more or less a slice of life. However, the movie was a dazzling showcase by the Hughes Brothers, who translated their cool visual style in music videos to film. The cinematography, editing, and lighting is fantastic. The pacing is quick, the various tones are played up beautifully. Whether it be dramatic, chaotic, or even humorous! The acting is also fairly solid, with Larenz Tate shining as the charismatic, but dangerous O-Dog. The narrative is really the only weak part in the movie. Plot points are seemingly raised and dropped, but I don't think plot mattered much. The point of the movie was to show the harsh realities of living in the "hood" and it succeeded in doing that. It's nihilistic, as opposed to Boyz n' the Hood's hopefulness. I prefer Boyz n' the Hood because it was more emotionally powerful with better acting. But as far as pure craft, the Hughes Brothers were far ahead of John Singleton. It's really apples and oranges, so I can see why many people would say this is better than Boyz n' the Hood. 9/10

Tangerine
- This rewatch was through a watch party. I would've otherwise watched this around Christmas. This was my third time watching Tangerine, and my admiration for the movie has only grown. It's reached the point where I find it heartwarming in the end. Building up to that finale was hilarity, chaos, loud music, and a very striking tour of Los Angeles, captured on an iPhone. It feels very real, which goes along nicely with a wacky, but realistic story. A great cast here as well. RIP James Ransone. 9/10

Hoop Dreams
- A mark of a great movie is not feeling the runtime. At 2 hours and 51 minutes, this documentary didn't feel like a slog at all. That long runtime is necessary as there is it's basically two high school stories, with some converging. This is a highly regarded documentary for good reason. It captures the pursuit of dreams from two Black teens in Chicago. They have different family dynamics and are seemingly at the same low income bracket. However, one basically enjoyed some privileges, especially financial, while the other had to work their way up the ladder. The privileged one also worked very hard and unfortunately went through physically daunting scenarios and his coach sucked ass! I loved following both stories. It's tragic, heartwarming, and as engaging as any 3-hour epic. 9/10

Poetic Justice
- John Singleton's follow-up to Boyz n the Hood. It turned out to be a very low-key romance/drama. The storytelling is rather soft and the road trip format that dominates the movie makes things feel loose with physical detours like a picnic or African festival offering variety. The dialogue is where much of the cliches come in, and this could've been a so-so film if not for some nice visuals that show Singleton improving as a technical filmmaker, and the performances from some members of the cast. The MVP by far is Tupac. He was very charming and easily got my attention. Acting was seemingly natural to him. He and Janet Jackson had good chemistry. Jackson was also a treat here. The poetry from Maya Angelou was lovely, I guess it was the throughline of the film. It's comedic at times, but the last third is very dramatic, regardless of how unsurprising it was. It did feel like John Singleton wasn't fully capable of telling a romance story, but the attempt is respectable. It still works as that, but Tupac's arc in general is what really helped the movie. There was some development from Janet Jackson and others, but Tupac's was the most interesting. 8/10

South Central
- This was the kind of hood movie John Singleton didn't want to happen if he couldn't direct Boys n the Hood. I would've expected this to be a Hollywood production, but it was an indie film that somehow had Oliver Stone attached as executive producer. It was written and directed by a white man from Colorado. It's based on the book, "The Original South Central L.A. Crips" by Donald Bakeer, a Black man, but it was fiction. The movie plays out like pure fiction with plot conveniences and complicated subjects resolved quickly, such as the finale being resolved from a speech. It felt inauthentic. The score also comes on too hard at times and is melodramatic. Most of the acting is inefficient, some is laughably bad. The guy who got his head knocked off by Jason Voorhees plays a crackhead here! The main character's kid was awful, I couldn't take him seriously. The setting doesn't feel distinct, you can tell they didn't really know South Central Los Angeles because they didn't bother showing locations all that much. The one legitimately good thing about the movie is Glenn Plummer. He was an effective lead, though he has some emotional outbursts that didn't feel right to me. I blame the writing and directing for that. Glenn Plummer also had a great, albeit small role in Menace II Society. It's interesting how in both movies, he plays a convict. Carl Lumbly was also good, but his most dramatic moments were silly. One highlight is the final speech, only because I recognized that it was spoofed in Don't Be a Menace to South Central While Drinking Your Juice in the Hood. That's really the main reason I watched South Central and a few other hood movies, to get myself ready for an upcoming revisit of a childhood favorite comedy. The ones I watched recently before South Central were great. South Central was sadly a pale imitation. 5.5/10

Marty Supreme
- The resurfacing of what went down during the filming of a sex scene in Good Time made me look at the Safdies in a negative light, especially Josh. Between that and Kevin O'Leary being an ICE bootlicker, I considered not watching Marty Supreme. Separate the art from the artist. And I have to say that the art is fucking fantastic! I absolutely loved this movie. It's modern American filmmaking at its finest, at an epic scale. The story might be predictable, but everything put into the story is incredible. It's ambitious, energetic, anxiety-inducing, and brilliantly paced. The 2 hours and 30 minutes flew by for me! It's basically the next step following Good Time and Uncut Gems. It completes what I've heard is called "The Shitbag Trilogy." The shitbag, played by Timothee Chalamet, is a scumbag, someone who drags people down, and is downright cursed. But damn, like Adam Sandler in Uncut Gems, I wanted to root for him. This is easily the best Timothee Chalamet performance I've seen, and I would be totally fine if he wins the Best Lead Actor Oscar. The cast is absolutely nuts. Kevin O'Leary sadly was great in this. He basically played himself, a complete asshole. The movie is filled to the brim with high-quality craft. It is easily one of my favorite movies of 2025. To be more exact, it's number 3, behind One Battle After Another and No Other Choice. It's also the 4th movie to get this rating. I'm now convinced 2025 was a truly great year of films. The last great movie of 2025. A masterpiece even. 10/10

Juice
- The first half of the movie was filled to the brim with hip-hop and some R&B, fitting the narrative perfectly as you get to learn about the 4 young male characters. One of them, Q, played by a very young Omar Epps, is a DJ and competes in a local competition. The DJ parts also contributed to how musically rich the movie was. I was digging that half of the movie. Then the second half felt like a major tone shift. And I also dug that! The whole narrative was very engaging, and made for an impressive directorial debut for Ernest Dickerson. His work as a cinematographer really paid off as the movie has a few strong visuals and camera shots. He worked with Spike Lee on a few of his films, including Do the Right Thing and Malcolm X. That would explain the dolly shot that resembles Spike Lee's distinct version. The second half of the movie pretty much turned to a horror flick with the villain being played by one of the four young male characters, Tupac! My goodness, Tupac's character Bishop was kind of scary, with him making some of the coldest entrances! I loved it, even when they're predictable. I wish the climax was more explosive, and there are some things not fleshed out very well, but this was a very strong 90s hood movie. A breath of fresh air for me after watching multiple hood movies set in Los Angeles. This one's set in Harlem, and the soundtrack reflects that! God, the soundtrack here is amazing. Tupac once again showed that he was a very good actor. 8/10

One of Them Days
- Basically a modern day, female-led version of Friday. I would say it leans more on the Friday sequels because those were a lot more absurd. However, the chemistry in the original Friday is closer to what this film has. It's a fun, breezy comedy set in Los Angeles. The two leads, Keke Palmer and SZA, carry this movie with their genuine bond. SZA is a major surprise as she's an R&B artist, but her acting her is better than previous R&B artists-turned actors, such as Kelly Rowland. This is another movie that reminds me how much I love Keke Palmer. She is so charismatic, so lively, she really elevates any character given to her. I really needed a brief break from the male-driven Black films. Also, all of them I watched so far this month were from the 90s. This was a lovely change of place. Some moments are too stupid, there are some notable technical errors, and the movie's wrap up is a little off, but it's consistently engaging. The supporting cast is very strong, whether it be small roles like that of Janelle James and Katt Williams, or more singificant roles like the two people chasing Palmer and SZA. Also, it's visually appealing, which I say because modern movies don't have enough colors. One of Them Days is colorful in many ways. 7.5/10
You know what was great? Dead Presidents. I assume you already saw it though because you seen a lot already. For those that don't know dead presidents revolved around some hoods that ended up joining the service and went through hell during the vietnam era.The film follows anthony a vietnam vet and his friends trying to adjust to life after nam. Its very graphic and its a social commentary film as well as a heist film. I'm going to have to rewatch this movie soon. Last time I saw it I was in my early 30s. Its pretty good but if you're looking for a real heist movie then you might be disappointed because this movie is soo much more than a heist film. The hughes brothers are great directors and this film is proof of this. The film scores a 6.9 on imdb which is pretty decent if you ask me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RustInPeace
Set It Off - This is a movie I wish I saw as a kid. I would've thought it was the coolest movie led by women. Anyway, this was F. Gary Gray's follow-up to Friday and he further showed growth as a filmmaker while flexing his music video chops. This movie's so stylish. The pacing is so effective, the 2 hours flew by. The editing goes hard at times, with a sex scene that is cut like a softcore scene mixed with an R&B music video. The violence hits well at times. The four main ladies all do a great job, even Jada Pinkett Smith, who I'm not a fan of. My favorite was easily Queen Latifah, I absolutely loved her energy. It kind of felt like a bait and switch that Smith was the lead instead of Vivica A. Fox. Fox starts the movie, but then after the first several minutes, it switches sharply to Smith as the clear lead. There are some major logic gaps and overly goofy moments. Plot conveniences too. The narrative is kind of wonky, but everything else is so energized. I'll also shout out John C. McGinley and Blair Underwood, who played well in their respective roles. Underwood especially, he was so slick and charming that it makes up for some very corny lines. Basically, this is a movie that works despite its obvious shortcomings. 8.5/10

Lurker
- A deeply unsettling movie that feels like Nightcrawler mixed with modern-day stan culture. It's very awkward, unnerving, unpredictable, but highly entertaining. The ending felt like a massive kick in the nuts, but a respectable one. Excellent casting, the guy who played the weirdo looked like a white Riz Ahmed. And the guy who played the musician was also great. I think he could've played Heathcliff in the new Wuthering Heights movie. 8/10

Oscar
- I think watching this right after Lurker mattered because I loved this a lot more than I expected. A very campy and absurd comedy is the right thing to watch after a movie like Lurker. One of the rare good comedies starring Sylvester Stallone. He does a fine job, but the movie is filled to the brim with committed comedic performances. The style of comedy is very retro, going along nicely with the 30s setting. It's based on a play, so the locations are limited, but there is constant movement and dialogue. It felt like a tornado of comedy with loads of gags and a plot that kept developing. I even got lost at some points, but the movie would remind me of things. Picking the favorite performer is tough. As of now, I'll go with Tim Curry. Chazz Palminteri is definitely up there, along with Marisa Tomei. I hate to give John Landis credit, but he has made some great movies. This is one of them. 9/10

Heart Eyes
- A very flawed, but interesting blend of the slasher genre and romantic comedy. The dialogue is cringy or clunky, there are many serious gaps in logic, and it's sometimes cheesy. But the two leads kept me invested, and I was very aroused seeing Jordana Brewster. The kills are decent. I'm probably cutting this movie too much slack, but I still like it overall. It works more than it shouldn't. 7/10

Deadpool
- Best love story ever. 10/10

Higher Learning
- John Singleton was touted as the next Spike Lee and this film is him in his Spike Lee bag. The film's basically Do the Ring Thing in a college setting. It achieves one thing Do the Right Thing mastered and that's escalating tension and becoming a powder keg explosion. Part of that is thanks to some good performances, such as Omar Epps. Begrudgingly, I have to say that Michael Rappaport gave one of the strongest performances. John Singleton's directing takes another leap from Poetic Justice and Boys n the Hood as it's flashier with wilder transitions and an iron grip on setting the tone. But the movie's so overstuffed. There are too many plotlines, too many interesting ideas, but many of them don't develop. It's very preachy and heavy-handed, with Laurence Fishburne's character being a representative of the bootstrap mentality. His performance was nice though, and his accent was funny, which I don't think was intentional. This would've been up there with Do the Right Thing if it was more focused and removed a few plotlines. The movie still hit me. The last third left me with strong feeling, enough for me to not rate this low. It is a lot to unpack, but just focusing on what the movie did for me emotionally, I am grateful for it. John Singleton, at least in the 90s, was not keen on making the same movie. I admire his efforts as I watch more of his films. 7/10
 
You know what was great? Dead Presidents. I assume you already saw it though because you seen a lot already. For those that don't know dead presidents revolved around some hoods that ended up joining the service and went through hell during the vietnam era.The film follows anthony a vietnam vet and his friends trying to adjust to life after nam. Its very graphic and its a social commentary film as well as a heist film. I'm going to have to rewatch this movie soon. Last time I saw it I was in my early 30s. Its pretty good but if you're looking for a real heist movie then you might be disappointed because this movie is soo much more than a heist film. The hughes brothers are great directors and this film is proof of this. The film scores a 6.9 on imdb which is pretty decent if you ask me.

I figured Dead Presidents would be a good watch for President's Day. I hadn't watched it before. I recognized the face paint because it was spoofed in Don't Be a Menace to South Central While Drinking Your Juice in the Hood. You're absolutely right in the description of the movie. It offers valuable social commentary, and the heist portion is only in the last third. That was an exciting part of the film, but all of it was so engaging. It was very flashy like Menace II Society, but the narrative is much more cohesive and stronger. I think the acting is even more solid, with Larenz Tate leading the movie so well. Keith David of course delivered. Chris Tucker was mostly just himself, but it was utilized wisely in this more dramatic film. His final scene was one of the most visually stunning moments in the movie. Bokeem Woodbine was great. It's funny that when he's bald, he looks so much like Dave Chapelle, but when he had hair and glasses, he looked like Samuel L. Jackson a bit. The film overall is visually and sonically dazzling. Vietnamese parables were so common, but this one felt fresh. The soundtrack is great. I expected the score to be popping since it was by Danny Elfman, but it wasn't very prominent. When it comes on, it does so strongly, so it's still a highlight in the film. I ended up liking Dead Presidents a lot. It's up there with Menace II Society, perhaps more underrated than that film. Especially after watching Higher Learning the day before, which came out the same year, this film had more focused social commentary. 9/10
 
High School Musical

grease_5.jpeg


One of my faves, been obsessed with Olivia's vocal range ever since I first saw this movie in 1995. Sha-Na-Na is also a fave of mine as a musical group, not so much as a variety show though.

Bought a lot of memories from the 90s, specifically from Zelda Link to the Past which I was stuck with the first time I saw this movie.
 
High School Musical

View attachment 557442

One of my faves, been obsessed with Olivia's vocal range ever since I first saw this movie in 1995. Sha-Na-Na is also a fave of mine as a musical group, not so much as a variety show though.

Bought a lot of memories from the 90s, specifically from Zelda Link to the Past which I was stuck with the first time I saw this movie.

:unsure::unsure::unsure: Manteca o Aciete?

Lard or Oil?
 
28 Years Later: The Bone Temple - Compared to the first 28 Years Later film, this is more stripped down. It's bleaker, more visceral in the violence, with fewer locations and a smaller cast. It's also more focused, slightly better paced, and tonally more consistent than the first 28 Years Later. I still very much like the first 28 Years Later film. I might be in the minority, but I appreciated its big swings. But The Bone Temple dials it back and rather than taking big swings, it's more surgical with its strikes. By stripping things back, the themes and all the moving parts are much more concentrated. Leaner and meaner basically. One downside is that Alfie Williams, who played the boy Spike in the first film, has a reduced role despite being one of the best parts of that film. The tradeoff, however, is that other actors take center stage and are fantastic! Ralph Fiennes and Jack O'Connell absolutely owned this movie, having me at the palm of their hands whenever they spoke. The movie still takes some bold swings, Alex Garland's script further refines the lore. Doing so opened the floor for a surprisingly poignant performance from Chi Lewis-Parry, who played Samson, the Alpha introduced in the first movie. I was also surprised that the Jimmys were memorable beyond their Jimmy Savile-inspired looks. Shout out to Erin Kellyman, who was the best of that lot.

This film already has the best scene of 2026! It's going to put up a fight for probably most of the year. I had goosebumps from that scene. I wish the movie had a bit more meat in the third act, and I would've liked more traditional Infected scenes. On a technical level, the movie isn't as dazzling as the first film. The cinematography is pulled back a bit for example. But the storytelling is sharper and the "Absolute Cinema" scene basically has all the dazzling shit put together. As for the final moment, it wasn't as much of a jolt as the first film's ending, but it looks like I'm in the minority for liking that ending. I wanted something like that for this film. Then again, that would've gone against what Nia DeCosta had in mind. Kudos to her for directing the best film in this franchise since the original. Officially, I'll give this an 8.5/10, but I've thought about giving it a 9, while bumping the first film up to a 10. But I'm not ready to make that change. 8,5 at least is better than the 8 I gave the first 28 Years Later.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: AncientBoi
MV5BNDdjZGQ5YzEtNTc2My00Mjc0LWFlMTctYzkwMzZlNzdiZWYzXkEyXkFqcGc@._V1_.jpg


I owned the VHS back in the day, never watched it until today.
I... if I had seen this at a younger age I think it could've been an all time favorite... but at this point in life it hits hard in a bittersweet way.

Not bad, I can see why it got 9 awards.
I miss Robin though, felt jpy seeing him acting again, felt like I was in the 90s once more.
Post automatically merged:

Penélope Cruz: The Movie

Vanilla_Sky-963282899-large.jpg


I was 8 when this movie came out, I still remember the (mostly good) critics it got.
If I'm not mistsken, was Penélope's first Movie out of Spain or something lile that.
I was never allowed to watch it back in the day, something about being "for Adults" (whatever that meant back then...) but i'm glad I literally took the time to finally watch it.

Loved every second of it, I paid attention to the cues from the begining, still lost track couple times because (if you're like me, and think ahead) I thought the begining was the end, but nope... the movie starts before the middle of it. Would like to say it "blew my mind" but after realization somewhere around the last 3rd of the movie, I finally got back to track and became predictive.

I must admit I wouldn't had ubderstood this as an 8 year old boy, but what I do admit is that this is my second time watching Penélope Cruz (first time being in "Piratas del Caribe" in 2011) but oh boy, she's my new crush now.
I've never paid attention to her like I just did and felt like I've met her before.
With all this said... if you're like me and like to be one/two steps forward, don't do it with this movie in order to enjoy the plot at it's fullest.
Post automatically merged:

p15829_v_h8_aw.jpg


Not my first time watching it... but definitely my first time watching it wih a critical thought.
Forrest Gump certainly was a product of it's time. Nowadays, doesn't hold that well.

Forrest Gump is only saved by the script, and Jenny isn't a villain.
I'd like to say she's a victim, from a psychological point of view (because she is) but for the sake of script, she's the result of bad decisions.
At the end, Jenny got her deserved synthesis, Gump on the other hand was left in much more trouble because all his points of support left him alone with a non deserved responsibility.
"I may not know much but I do know about love" could be most honest thing Gump ever said, and not for the sake of narrative, but because that's probably all Gump learned by himself.
As a character, he didn't grew as much as y'all would want to believe... because again, he's saved by the script.
It would've been nice though, and I think it's implied, that he's at least joined by lieutenant Dan after Jenny's passing.

The score though, pretty good for what it is, but the product as a whole? I think it's overrated.
Post automatically merged:

As if the producers predicted Internet in 2025: The Movie

hr9bfRXIHxJ6Qcsw6u6jNnBzVfh.jpg


It's been only 10 minutes and I'm rolling my eye back more times than yo mama in a night out with p1ngy.
Post automatically merged:

zxUhHQxKRbVLsaHR1V81SWYADOl.webp


Last time I saw this movie was in 2016... first time I saw it was in VHS when I was 8 years old.
I really love this movie, it's one of my faves, and not just for Frances O'Connor.

This time I just noticed how heavy is with symbolism, and I've always felt terribly sad by the ending. I'm not sure what's the meaning of leaving Teddy all alone after all he went through. I'm not sure if that's open for interpretation or if I'm lacking information regarding fairy tales.
 
Last edited by JuanMena,
Killer of Sheep - I don't think I watched this film in the best condition. This 1978 film is in black-and-white and is set in Watts, California. It's only 80 minutes long and was filmed on a budget of $10000 with no permits and the use of a lot of copyright music. In a way, the movie is about nothing. It's about Black people living in Watts, and their lives are very mundane. It's like a slice-of-life, but it doesn't have typical emotional high points. It's meandering, slow, but it feels like real life. The black-and-white look is appealing, and certain scenes shocked me. But it was a little tough to get through at points. I was getting tired and frankly bored. I watched this at night and ate dinner so quickly. Maybe that messed me up. It would've helped if I knew about the movie more. I just knew it's on Criterion and was rated so highly. It's still decent. I can see that there's symbolism. The music is great, and some of the acting is solid. Amateur actors, but still solid. I am interested in other films from director Charles Burnett. I can see Killer of Sheep being taught in film classes. It's a nice demonstration of how to make a movie about nothing on the surface. It's a movie that might be whatever you want it to be. A movie that shows the American Dream fully dead? A movie that shows the horror of complacency, stagnation, and being stuck in the hood? Whatever it is, I can respect it. 7/10
 
  • Like
Reactions: MFDC12
Why Did I Get Married Too? - Despite my disdain for the first movie, I was convinced to give the sequel a chance because of the ending. I had heard the ending is insane and that the movie up to that point was pretty good, even better than the first movie. Well, I ended up sharing that opinion...to an extent. I think the movie is very rough at first, with dialogue going on and on and feeling so staged and telegraphed. I know the first movie is based on Tyler Perry's original play, so these movies kind of flow like that. Limited locations, loud stage acting that isn't really configured for the film, and a small, tight cast of characters. That schtick wore itself out in the first movie and there's barely a difference here. The drama drummed up here was a lot more artificial and seemingly ignored how things wrapped up in the previous movie. For example, Janet Jackson and Malik Yoba's characters had one issue that was resolved in the first movie, but somehow their relationship is on the verge of collapsing in the 2nd movie. It was as if the issue from the previous film wasn't resolved and it grew like a cancer. The issue from the first movie was referenced too, so that was strange. The same issue between Michael Jai White and Tasha Smith comes up, but at least that stuff was entertaining. The same issues that were in the first movie were present here. One major difference is that there's no horrible fat shaming. The 2nd half of the movie is stronger and doesn't meander like the 2nd half in the previous film. It was there where I felt that the movie was finally hitting a groove. The drama was turned up, mainly because of Janet Jackson. Her performance in the first movie was uneventful. Here, she owns the movie, and I think a huge part of it is because she channeled real-life grief and sadness into her performance. Michael Jackson died during production of this film. They paused production, and when they resumed, Janet Jackson used her pain for this performance. You can see her visibly distraught at some points. The crying and emotional outburst felt so raw and real. When she took over, it felt like the movie was actually going to be decent.

But then the ending happened. It came out of nowhere, it was completely insane, and I laughed! It's not supposed to be funny. But it's hilarious and dreadful at the same time. Once the laughs stopped, the horrible writing was too much to ignore. It was such an ass-pull of an ending. It was even worse with the final moment because it totally negated the sudden dramatic heft brought on a few minutes before. I had heard this movie was when Tyler Perry started to lose his mind, and I see that now. While the ending is still funny and my reaction to it was the biggest I had for the whole movie, it's a heavy anchor that drags the whole film down. As a result, I'd actually give this the same rating as the first movie. If the ending was better and actually devastating, then it would've been a 5 or maybe even a 6. Tyler Perry is a dreadful storyteller and filmmaker, but at least I can laugh about it sometimes. 4/10
 
28 Years Later - The Bone Temple
So timely in the current world climate of pedogeddon to have a band of wandering Jimmy Savilles, wtf. They were still less monstrous than the man himself.
IDK, enjoyable followup to the, uh, one before it, sad loss of one character and interesting progression for another.
How long until the threequel?
 
Manos: The Hands of Fate - I've watched it alone before, but this viewing was through a watch party. That's best because this movie is painfully slow and edited poorly. It's infamous as a "so bad it's good" movie, a cult classic, but it's so bad it's bad most of the time. I did laugh many times, so that puts me pretty much in the middle with Manos. The rating thus reflects that. 5/10

Looper
- Suspension of disbelief is so necessary for this. There's one plothole that stuck with me. The makeup work for Joseph Gordon-Levitt was an admirable attempt at making him look like a young Bruce Willis, but it's often Uncanny Valley stuff. I'm probably forgiving toward this time travel movie. The dramatic points are very effective, the cast were entertaining, though Paul Dano's role was way too small. JGL and Bruce Willis were good, Emily Blunt was a treat. The action sequences were exciting, and I like the time travel concept in general. It's a solid movie overall. 8/10
 
1771706175725.jpeg


What the fuck did I just watched?
I'm not THAT sleep deprived to not have made some sense of this.
Italian mixed with french and english... continuity problems, bad acting, laughable CGI and script issues trying to make sense of a boring story by mixing the popular parts of classic Grim Brothers' Tales.

I admit, not for children, but direction isn't aimed to adults either.
I can't believe Damon, Ledger and Bellucci agreed to participate in what seems to be not only an awful production, but a flat out shameless parody.

The only parts that are worth (out of 2 hours) are Lena's scenes. She looks so stunning that it's as if almost her scenes were carefully planned, composed and framed by a real director.

Wouldn't watch again.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: AncientBoi
New Jack City - This was very preachy in the anti-drug messaging while also being deliberately ignorant over the inner workings of the crack epidemic in the 80s. It also features a basic cop procedural that veers into copaganda, which is also weird since Ice T of all people plays a cop. The dialogue can be very cheesy and preachy. The movie wraps up a little too quickly, and the dubbing is so obvious a lot of the time. But the movie shines when the music is front and center thanks to a fantastic soundtrack and even musical performances in the film. It also shines when Wesley Snipes is on the screen. He ate up the Nino Brown character and is easily the main reason to watch the movie. I do like the cinematography and overall style of the movie. It feels like a Blaxploitation movie, which would make sense since the director, Mario Van Peebles, is the son of a legendary filmmaker in that genre, Melvin Van Peebles. I do let go some of the preachy shit. Style over substance, but Wesley Snipes sure brings a lot of style AND substance in his performance. 8.5/10
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum